Flying The Web For News.
  • Career Exam Study
    Career Exam Study
  • US Politics
    US Politics
  • E-commerce Guide
    E-commerce Guide
  • Dropshipping Guide
    Dropshipping Guide
  • Microsoft Exam
    Microsoft Exam
  • IT Career News
    IT Career News

Article Tools/Herramientas de artículos

+ Larger Font/Fuente más grande | - Smaller Font/Fuente más pequeña




Consumer Daily Reports

Homeowners say the knobs on the front of the ranges are too easy to bump

By Amritpal Sandhu-Longoria of ConsumerAffairs
March 10, 2025

Ricardo Beas of Buffalo, New York, had just finished remodeling his kitchen and decided to host a party at his home. During the gathering, a guest bumped into his newly installed LG electric range, prompting it to turn on without anyone noticing.

A plate left atop the range exploded.

It couldve been much worse, Beas said about the incident, noting there are no children and only he, his wife and cat live in the home.

Beas, who has had the range since 2022, received the recall notice issued by LG and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission in early February and was hoping the remedy would be to return the range. But during a call with LG customer service, he felt like he was being scolded for not knowing about the software locking mechanism, he said.

The remedy from the company and the federal government would just be a free warning sticker.

Beas owns one of the approximately 500,000 ranges that are being recalled in the U.S. due to it being deemed a potential fire hazard. The sensitivity of the front-mounted knobs can cause the range to turn on accidentally, by both humans andpets. The Commission received 86 reports of accidental activation, 28 fires, and five fires that resulted in more than $340,000 worth of property damage.

Twenty days after the U.S. notice for recall, Canada issued a recall for 137,257 LG ranges sold in thatcountry. The remedy is the same as it was for U.S. consumers a free warning label.

Jodi DAless of Ontario, Canada, has one of the recalled ranges, and said she is scared to death of it.

Six months after installing the range in 2018, paper towels left atop the stove caught fire.

All I could see was flames, she said. My house could have burned down.

Now, she doesnt leave the house without checking the range being off.

I still have nightmares about it, she said.

She had called LG when the fire first happened, but never received a call back, calling the LG customer service non-existent.

She too said she didnt know about the software lock mechanism, nor did she receive the recent recall notice in Canada.

Like Beas and DAless, consumers are frustrated with the free sticker solution, and were hoping that LG would do more to remedy the matter. Like DAless, some are plannng to get rid of the range altogether.

'Issuing a sticker is not going to prevent fires'

Consumer complaints to the Commission include reports of someone accidentally bumping into the range, only to realize it was triggered after they found items atop their stove burned and their house full of smoke. Some reported burns requiring First Aid.

But many of these reports dont make it to the federal government.

Owners of LG ranges currently under recall who spoke to ConsumerAffairssaid the knobs are sensitive and turn the range on easily, sometimes with a slight bump. They did not report the incidents to the Commission.

Jim Van Dyk, 58, of Boston, Massachusetts, had his LG range installed during a kitchen renovation. Contractors placed a blanket on top of the ranges glass to shield it from scratches. But someone bumped into the appliance, triggering it andmelting the blanket.

He contacted LG following the incident, only to be told the range was not under warranty.

I think your ranges are unsafe, he told them over the phone. I think this is a product problem.

While an LG tech replaced the top for free, Van Dyk wasted no time addressing the sensitive knobs, opting to install toddler-proof knob covers to prevent any future mishaps.

It wasnt until the recall that he learned about the locking mechanism. While he calls the free sticker remedy ridiculous, he said he will use it once he gets it, but prefers the range be replaced.

Those knobs are unsafe as they are, he said. Its kind of a pain.

When Marianna Helin of Pompano Beach, Florida, was having her kitchen remodeled in 2020, contractors told her the LG range turned on automatically during installation.

She had chosen the range for its aesthetic, she said, but noticed that the sensitive knobs triggered the range to turn on and heat up very quickly.

As a nurse, she began worrying about the safety of the appliance what would happen if someone older with dementia accidentally touched the range? What if she was reaching for something above the range?

All you have to do is lean over, she said about the range being triggered on.

She didnt want to take the risk. By the time she received the recall notice, she had already given the appliance away. She notified the new owner about the recall and the sticker remedy.

Issuing a sticker is not going to prevent fires, she said. This is an elementary design flaw.

Dawn Stubitsch, 70, of Lake Saint Louis, Missouri, had a dish towel catch fire three weeks after her LG range was installed. She didnt think anything was wrong with the range at the time of the incident, but began to notice the sensitivity of the knobs over time.

I just inadvertently walked by the thing and it turned on, she said of the LG range.

Seven months later, she called LG, who sent over a repairman to have a look. But she was told the range would not be replaced because it was still working, and she was instead shown how to lock the knobs.

So when she heard about the recall, she thought LG would take the appliance back, but was flabbergasted to learn that the remedy was a warning sticker.

This is like a bandaid on a sharkbite, she said.

Her model number is included in the recall, but the serial number is not. She said she was in touch with LG customer service, who said her range would be included in the recall.

It probably means theyre going to give me a big sticker, she said. One I can mount on the wall.

She said she spent approximately $1,400 on the range, and finds the remedy to be an insult.

Thats a boatload of money to get something that can burn your house down, she said. When you pay that kind of money, you shouldnt have to lock the knob.

She said it irritates her to keep her range locked at all times, and sometimes she doesnt always remember to do it. She would rather LG take back the range so she can get something with knobs in the back.

A 'consumer education campaign'

But LG argues that this recall is more of a consumer education and awareness campaign to ensure LG range owners know that the locking mechanism exists.

John Taylor, senior vice president of LG Electronics USA, said LG recognizes that the range knobs were sensitive, which is why the lock feature was installed and was explained in the manual.

The solution was already built into the product, said Taylor.

Taylor added that anyone who requests a warning label will get one, even though one was already placed on the range. Taylor said the agreement struck between LG and the Commission was to make it a more prominent label and position it closer to the knobs.

Were happy to work with each consumer, he said.

Class action lawsuits

LG Electronics USA is currently the subject of a class action lawsuit for the recalled ranges.

According to the complaint filed in New Jersey mid-February, the suit centers around plaintiff Angel Solari of Mississippi purchased an LG range for his second home in Madison, Wisconsin, and is alleging that LG was aware of the faulty knobs and continued to sell the ranges without disclosing the dangers to the consumer.

Lawyers are also alleging that the design was defective and unreasonably dangerous, causing exposure to a material with harmful effects, deeming the product worthless. Lawyers are aiming to represent anyone who purchased a recalled range between 2015 and January 2025.

A similar class action lawsuit was moved to arbitration in March 2023. In that lawsuit, the plaintiff alleged the defective knobs caused a fire in his home

The listed model number in the class action lawsuit is now one of the models that was recalled.




Posted: 2025-03-10 00:34:47

Get Full News Story On Consumer Affairs



Listen to this article. Speaker link opens in a new window.
Text To Speech BETA Test Version.



More News From This Category

Consumer News: Survey finds strong support for core childhood vaccines, doubts linger over flu and COVID shots

Fri, 19 Sep 2025 22:07:07 +0000

Home-schoolers and MAGA acherents more likely to reject vaccines

By Truman Lewis of ConsumerAffairs
September 19, 2025

  • KFF/Washington Post survey of 2,700 parents finds broad trust in MMR and polio vaccines but less confidence in flu and COVID-19 shots.

  • About one in six parents say they have delayed or skipped recommended childhood vaccines, citing safety concerns.

  • Confidence in federal health agencies remains low, with only 14% expressing strong trust in the CDC or FDA.


A new survey by KFF and The Washington Post shows large majorities of U.S. parents believe childhood vaccines such as measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) and polio are safe and essential. The poll, based on interviews with 2,716 parents, highlights widespread acceptance of the long-standing vaccines that have been a foundation of public health for decades.

Concerns about newer vaccines

Parents are less confident about flu and COVID-19 vaccines. While most say they keep their children up to date on the recommended childhood schedule, about 16% reported delaying or skipping at least one vaccine (excluding flu and COVID). Younger parents, Republicansespecially those aligned with the Make America Great Again movementand parents who homeschool were more likely to report skipping or delaying shots.

Safety fears and misinformation

The top reasons cited for avoiding some vaccines were fear of side effects, mistrust of vaccine safety, and doubts about whether all shots are necessary. The poll also revealed widespread uncertainty about misinformation: while just 9% of parents believe the false claim that MMR causes autism, nearly half (48%) said they dont know enough to say. Parents of children with autism spectrum disorder were somewhat more likely to accept the false claim.

Support for school vaccine mandates remains high, with 81% of parents saying students should be required to get measles and polio vaccines, allowing for medical and religious exemptions. Eight percent of parents reported seeking exemptions so their children could attend school or daycare.

Distrust in federal health agencies

Confidence in federal health agencies remains shaky. Just 14% of parents expressed a lot of confidence in the CDC or FDA to ensure vaccine safety and effectiveness, while half said they had little or no confidence. About a quarter of parents believe the CDC recommends too many vaccines.

The survey was conducted as Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. continues to question federal vaccine policy. Few parentsonly 11%reported hearing much about his changes to vaccine policy, and most said they were unsure how those changes might affect safety, access, or industry influence.

Survey background

The KFF/Washington Post survey was conducted online from July 18 to Aug. 4, 2025, in English and Spanish, using Ipsos KnowledgePanel. It is the 37th collaboration between KFF and The Post since 1995, combining survey research with in-depth reporting.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Our bathroom phone habits may be raising hemorrhoid risk

Fri, 19 Sep 2025 22:07:07 +0000

A new study examines whether smartphone use on the toilet is linked to more hemorrhoids and longer sit-times

By Kristen Dalli of ConsumerAffairs
September 19, 2025
  • About two-thirds of people in the study used their smartphones while sitting on the toilet, and those users were much more likely to stay there for over five minutes.

  • After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, fiber intake, exercise, and straining, smartphone toilet-use was associated with a ~46% higher chance of having hemorrhoids.

  • There were no major differences in constipation or frequency of straining between phone-users and non-users, suggesting that the extra sitting time (not straining) may be the link.


If you find yourself scrolling, checking social media, or catching up on news while sitting on the toilet, youre far from alone. But could that habit be doing more than just eating up your time?

A recent study conducted at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center raises the possibility that using a smartphone during bathroom visits may increase the risk of developing hemorrhoids.

Hemorrhoids are common, uncomfortable, and costly in terms of health care. While things like constipation, low-fiber diets, and pregnancy are established risk factors, researchers wanted to explore whether this modern habit of toilet scrolling also plays a role.

I was struck by this fantastic old study from 1989 in The Lancet on hemorrhoids and reading the newspaper on the toilet, researcher Dr. Trisha Pasricha said in a news release. They looked at how many patients read the newspaper on the toilet and then doctors had a look to see how many of them had hemorrhoids.

But that study did find that there was this association. More hemorrhoids were found amongst people who spent time reading on the toilet. Now in 2025, I don't think anyone's reading the newspaper, but we know everybody's on their phones in the bathroom. So I thought we needed to update this literature for the modern TikTok era.

The study

The study recruited 125 adults who were undergoing routine screening colonoscopies. Before their procedures, participants filled out detailed surveys about their demographics (age, sex, BMI), lifestyle (diet, physical activity), and specific bathroom behaviors: how often they used a phone while on the toilet, how long they stayed, and what they did with their phones (e.g. read news or use social media).

Doctors then checked for hemorrhoids during the colonoscopies. To ensure fairness and reduce bias, two independent endoscopists reviewed a subset of high-quality images to confirm internal hemorrhoids.

The analysis included adjusting for known risk factors like fiber intake, straining, exercise, etc., so the researchers could assess whether phone use was associated with hemorrhoids independent of those factors.

The results

Heres what they found:

  • Prevalence of phone use: Roughly 66% of the participants reported using smartphones while on the toilet.

  • Longer sit times: Among phone users, 37.3% stayed more than five minutes per toilet visit, compared with only 7.1% of non-users.

  • Increased risk: After controlling for other factors, use of a smartphone on the toilet was associated with a 46% increased odds of having hemorrhoids.

  • No difference in straining or constipation: The groups did not differ significantly in their reports of straining, constipation, or related gastrointestinal symptoms, suggesting that the extra sitting time may be the key factor.

  • Demographics: Smartphone-users were younger on average ( 55 years) than non-users ( 62 years). Also, phone users had lower weekly physical activity.

What we can take away

The study doesnt prove cause and effect it can't show that phones cause hemorrhoids but it does suggest a strong association. If nothing else, it raises a simple habit-change possibility.

My colleagues and I in GI, we all tell our patients not to spend longer than a couple minutes on the toilet, Dr. Pasricha said.

I think whats happening is that time sort of slows down when youre scrolling, and people dont realize just how much longer theyre sitting there.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Tyson ditches corn syrup in major ingredient overhaul

Fri, 19 Sep 2025 22:07:07 +0000

The food giant is cutting high fructose corn syrup and other additives from U.S. products by 2025

By Kristen Dalli of ConsumerAffairs
September 19, 2025
  • Tyson Foods will stop using high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), sucralose, BHA/BHT, and titanium dioxide in its branded U.S. products by the end of 2025.

  • These changes affect major brands like Tyson, Jimmy Dean, Hillshire Farm, Wright,State Fair, Aidells, and ibp.

  • All of the ingredients being removed are currently approved by the FDA and considered safe, but Tyson says this move reflects changing consumer expectations and their own values.


Tyson Foods is making a voluntary change: by the end of 2025, it will eliminate four specific ingredients high fructose corn syrup, sucralose (a sweetener), BHA/BHT (preservatives), and titanium dioxide (a coloring agent) from its branded product lines in the U.S.

These ingredients are already FDA-approved and safe to use. The company isnt reacting to a safety mandate theyre responding to what consumers seem to want more of: simpler ingredient lists, fewer additives, and more transparency.

We continuously review and assess our product portfolio to ensure the highest quality products that meet the needs of consumers, Donnie King, President & CEO of Tyson Foods, said in a news release.

Our decision to remove high fructose corn syrup and other ingredients reflects our ongoing commitment to feeding the world like family, while preserving the taste, value and integrity that define our iconic brands.

Brands & products affected

Youll see the shift in a lot of the familiar names: Tyson, Jimmy Dean, Hillshire Farm, Wright, State Fair, Aidells, ibp, and others.

Earlier this year, Tyson also removed synthetic dyes from its domestic branded products. So this is part of an ongoing trend for them.

What this might mean for you

  • Taste & price: Tyson says they aim to preserve the taste, value, and integrity of their products even with these changes.

  • Ingredient labels: Going forward, youll see different ingredient lists expect to see substitutes or natural alternatives in place of whats being removed.

  • Choice & transparency: If youve been avoiding these additives or want cleaner labels, this change gives you more options in familiar brands.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Most kids in fatal U.S. car crashes weren’t properly restrained, study finds

Fri, 19 Sep 2025 22:07:07 +0000

A recent study reveals whats going wrong and where with child car-seat and seatbelt use

By Kristen Dalli of ConsumerAffairs
September 19, 2025

  • Nearly 70% of U.S. children under 13 in crashes involving a fatality were using restraints improperly or not at all.

  • Common misuses include moving too soon to less protective restraints, seating children in the front, or failing to buckle them in.

  • The risk is highest among older kids (412), in low-resources communities, and in certain geographic hotspots; stronger state policies seem to help.


We all know car crashes can be deadly especially for children. But a new study shows just how often safety fails when it comes to using child restraint systems (CRS), like car seats and seatbelts.

According to research out of Lurie Childrens Hospital, nearly 70% of children under age 13 involved in U.S. car crashes with at least one fatality were not in a properly used or age-appropriate restraint.

That means even when seats, belts and laws exist, the people entrusted with children too often arent getting it quite right. The implications are huge: safety isnt just about having the right gear, but about using it correctly, all the time.

Given the continued problem of suboptimal child passenger safety practices among children across the country, there is a need for innovative, targeted programs to promote correct and consistent use of age-appropriate car seats, restraints and seating locations, lead author Arthi Kozhumam, MScGH, said in a news release.

The study

To understand what went wrong and where, the researchers tapped into a massive data source: the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) a national database that records car crashes resulting in deaths.

Heres what they focused on:

  • Who: Children under 13 years old involved in crashes with at least one fatality.

  • What they measured: Whether the child was using an age-appropriate CRS, whether they were prematurely moved to a less protective restraint, whether they were unrestrained at all, and whether they were seated in the front seat.

  • Where and when: The study covered crashes from 2011 to 2021 across the U.S., and also examined community-level factors such as resources (Child Opportunity Index) and geographic concentration (hotspots) of poor restraint use.

  • Policy angle: They also checked how state laws (how strict the laws are, fines for first time seatbelt or restraint violations) related to correct restraint use.

The results

The findings are sobering. Among the ~50,000 children studied:

  • 36% were moved too early to a less protective restraint (for example, transitioning from a car seat to a booster or booster to seatbelt before safe to do so).

  • 20% were unrestrained no seatbelt, no CRS.

  • 15% were riding in the front seat (which is less safe for younger children overall).

  • Further, 9% of those front-seat riders were unrestrained.

Certain groups were at greater risk:

  • Kids aged 4-7 and 8-12 had higher rates of suboptimal restraint use.

  • Children in communities with lower resources (using the Child Opportunity Index as a measure) were more likely to be improperly restrained.

  • Certain counties across the U.S. stood out as hotspots where improper practices are much more common.

On a brighter note, the study found that in states with stronger child restraint laws including larger fines for first-offense violations there were significantly lower odds of children being improperly restrained.

A novel contribution of this research is our finding of geographic concentrations of suboptimal child passenger safety practices. These areas can be targeted for interventions, especially in the most vulnerable age groups, senior author Michelle Macy, M.D., M.S., said in the news release.

In addition to identifying individual factors and geographic areas that can be targeted for interventions, we show that state policy makes a huge difference in promoting safer transportation practices for child passengers.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy pill shows promise, matching weight loss from shots

Fri, 19 Sep 2025 19:07:07 +0000

Many patients would prefer to take a few pills than give themselves injections

By James R. Hood of ConsumerAffairs
September 19, 2025

  • Patients on daily pill lost about 17% of body weight in trial
  • Results nearly identical to injectable Wegovy

  • New obesity pill race could bring easier options for patients


A new option beyond shots

For patients hoping to avoid needles, a pill form of the blockbuster weight-loss drug Wegovy may soon be an option. Novo Nordisk said in a press release thatpeople who took the daily pill in a clinical trial lost an average of 16.6% of their body weight over 64 weeks almost the same result seen with the widely used Wegovy injection. By comparison, people taking a placebo lost just 2.7%.

The findings raise hopes that oral versions of GLP-1 drugs could make weight management easier for millions. Demand for injections like Wegovy and Eli Lillys Zepbound has already far outstripped supply.

Rivalry that benefits patients

The new pill isnt on pharmacy shelves yet the Food and Drug Administration is reviewing Novo Nordisks application, with a decision expected later this year. Eli Lilly is not far behind, with its own obesity pill, called orforglipron, also moving toward FDA submission.

In Lillys recent study of nearly 1,700 adults with Type 2 diabetes, orforglipron helped patients lose weight and lower blood sugar. Experts say that because it doesnt need to be taken on an empty stomach, it could be easier to use than Novo Nordisks pill, which must be taken before eating or drinking.

What patients should know

The results are striking: nearly a third of participants on Novo Nordisks pill lost at least 20% of their body weight. Even those who didnt follow instructions exactly still lost an average of 13.6%. Participants also reported improved activity levels and cardiovascular health.

But convenience comes with caveats. Side effects were common: nearly half of users experienced nausea and about a third had vomiting. Most cases were mild to moderate, but about 7% of patients stopped treatment because of side effects. Lillys pill showed similar issues, with about 10% of people on the highest dose dropping out.

Looking ahead

Analysts expect obesity pills to become a multibillion-dollar market, and both companies say they are working to ensure supply, after months of shortages for their injectables.

For patients, the developments could soon mean more options and less reliance on weekly shots though experts stress that healthy lifestyle changes will remain essential alongside any medication.


Consumer takeaway

Who might benefit:

  • Adults who are overweight or obese and have struggled with diet and exercise alone

  • People who are uncomfortable with injectable medications

What to ask your doctor:

  • Am I a candidate for a GLP-1 weight-loss drug?

  • How do side effects compare between shots and pills?

  • Will my insurance cover it if approved?

What to watch out for:

  • Common side effects include nausea and vomiting

  • Pills may need to be taken on an empty stomach and with timing restrictions

  • Long-term safety and availability are still being studied


Timeline: When could the pills be available?

  • Early 2025: Novo Nordisk expects an FDA decision on its Wegovy pill.

  • Mid-to-late 2025: Eli Lilly plans to seek FDA approval for its pill, orforglipron.

  • If approved: Both companies say they are scaling up production to meet demand and avoid shortages that have plagued injectables.

  • Pharmacy shelves: Widespread availability could begin as soon as late 2025, depending on FDA review speed and manufacturing capacity.


Read More ...


Related Bing News Results

Consumer Spending Update: Economic Confidence Down Again in September

Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:24:00 GMT
Economic confidence decreased to 109.4 in this month’s Rasmussen Reports Economic Index, more than two points lower than August.

5 affordable new cars that Consumer Reports recommends

Wed, 06 Aug 2025 06:24:00 GMT
While inflation rates have fallen substantially from their June 2022 peak of 9.1%, consumer prices are still rising, and the wave of tariffs introduced by the Trump administration in 2025 — ...











Blow Us A Whistle




Related Product Search/Búsqueda de productos relacionados