Rockin Robin SongFlying The Web For News.
RobinPost Logo Amazon Prime Deals





Consumer Daily Reports

The decision by the Trump-influenced panel has alarmed many physicians and public health experts

By Truman Lewis of ConsumerAffairs
December 5, 2025

CDC vaccine panel votes to scrap long-standing hepatitis B shot at birth
New guidance urges parents of low-risk newborns to consult a doctor and delay first dose
Critics warn move could raise infections of a virus that can cause cirrhosis and liver cancer


A key federal vaccine advisory panel has voted to end more than three decades of guidance that all newborns receive a hepatitis B shot within hours of birth, a move that has alarmed many public-health experts.

In an 83 vote Friday, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended scrapping the universal birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine. The recommendation came after the panel heard presentations from multiple vaccine skeptics.

The change would roll back guidance that has been in place since 1991, when the CDC adopted routine infant hepatitis B vaccination as a cornerstone of its strategy to curb infections. Scientists have credited the policycombined with follow-up childhood doseswith driving down new hepatitis B infections in the U.S., particularly among children.

The panels recommendation must still be endorsed by the acting CDC director before it can take effect.

Panel urges case-by-case decisions and later start to vaccination

Under the new guidance, ACIP said if a pregnant person tests negative for hepatitis B, parents should consult a physician about whether their newborn needs the first dose at birth. For infants who skip the birth dose, the committee suggested delaying the first shot until at least two months of age.

The vote follows a sweeping overhaul of the committee earlier this year by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who removed all previous members and installed a new panel.

Supporters of the change argued that most newborns face low risk of hepatitis B infection and raised questions about possible, but unproven, long-term side effects of the vaccine.

Patients are unaware that their babies are getting a lot of interventions in the first few hours of life, said Dr. Evelyn Griffin, an obstetrician on the panel who voted for the new recommendation, according to a Wall Street Journal report. Parental rights are violated.

Griffin suggested the vaccine could be linked to autoimmune conditions, while acknowledging that no high-quality studies have demonstrated such a risk.

Critics say evidence shows birth dose is safe and effective

Other committee members and outside experts strongly opposed the move, saying it was not based on the weight of scientific evidence.

They pointed to randomized trials and more than three decades of real-world data supporting the safety of the hepatitis B vaccine in newborns, as well as continuous monitoring through vaccine-safety surveillance systems that have not identified unusual harms.

Public-health specialists have long warned that limiting the birth dose to babies of women known to have hepatitis Bor delaying vaccinationcan create dangerous gaps in protection. Prenatal hepatitis B testing is typically done in the first trimester, leaving time for a pregnant person to become infected later in pregnancy. Some never get tested at all.

Beyond transmission from mother to baby, hepatitis B can spread through contact with infected blood and body fluids, including via shared household items such as razors, toothbrushes or washcloths. Household and early-childhood transmission are key reasons global health agencies have pushed the birth dose.

The birth dose is critical to preventing hepatitis B, which is the leading cause of liver cancer worldwide, said Chari Cohen, president of the Hepatitis B Foundation. It is not a virus you want your baby to have.


Background: What is hepatitis B and why does the birth dose matter?

Hepatitis B is a viral infection that attacks the liver. Many adults who become infected clear the virus on their own, but when infection occurs in infancy or early childhood, it is much more likely to become chronic, lasting for life. Chronic hepatitis B can cause cirrhosis (severe scarring of the liver), liver failure and liver cancer. Globally, hepatitis B is estimated to cause hundreds of thousands of deaths each year, largely from liver-related complications.

The virus is spread through blood and certain body fluidsvia sexual contact, shared needles, or from mother to child during pregnancy or birth. Because newborns immune systems respond differently, an infant infected at birth has up to a 90% chance of developing chronic hepatitis B, compared with fewer than 10% of healthy adults who are infected.

The hepatitis B vaccine, introduced in the 1980s and widely recommended for U.S. infants since 1991, is one of the most intensively studied vaccines. Decades of data show it to be highly effective in preventing infection and associated liver disease, with serious side effects considered rare according to major health authorities including the CDC and World Health Organization.

The birth dose is designed as a safety net: it helps protect infants whose mothers have been misdiagnosed, infected late in pregnancy, or never tested, and it reduces opportunities for household transmission in the first months of life. Many countries, guided by the WHO, recommend a hepatitis B shot within 24 hours of birth, followed by additional doses in infancy.

Public-health experts fear that delaying or skipping the birth dose could leave more babies vulnerable during a critical windowespecially in communities with higher rates of hepatitis B or limited access to prenatal care and testing.


Next steps for the controversial recommendation

The ACIP vote does not automatically change U.S. immunization policy. The committees recommendations must be reviewed and accepted by the CDCs acting director before they become part of the agencys official vaccine schedule.

In the meantime, health systems, pediatricians and parents are likely to face questions about whether to follow the long-standing practice of giving the hepatitis B shot at birth or the new, more limited guidance if it is adopted.

Many public-health and liver-disease experts say they will continue urging parents to accept the birth dose, arguing that the benefits and safety of early hepatitis B vaccination are well established, while the risks of delaying are borne by the smallest and most vulnerable patients.




Posted: 2025-12-05 16:34:35

Get Full News Story On Consumer Affairs



Listen to this article. Speaker link opens in a new window.
Text To Speech BETA Test Version.



More News From This Category
Consumer News: Global gold rally intensified this week amid rising uncertainty
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:07:07 +0000

The precious metal hit yet another record high on Tuesday

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs
January 21, 2026
  • Gold prices hit new multi-year and record highs this week as investors pour into the safe-haven metal.

  • Geopolitical tensions and renewed trade risks, especially U.S. tariff threats tied to Greenland, are cited as key triggers.

  • Analysts are divided on sustainability: some see ongoing structural support while others warn of potential corrections if macro conditions shift.


Gold prices surged sharply this week, with bullion climbing to unprecedented levels as markets grapple with heightened geopolitical and economic uncertainty. In trading ahead of the World Economic Forum, gold soared above $4,800 per ounce, a new record, as investors moved away from risk assets into traditional safe havens.

The rally was broad-based: major benchmarks in the Middle East and Asia also recorded historic highs, and silver and other precious metals followed suit. In Dubai, retail gold jumped sharply, reflecting the broader international trend. On Wednesday, there was no immediate sell-off as gold edged slightly higher than Tuesday's close.

Drivers behind the surge

Market analysts point to a confluence of factors fueling the recent surge:

  • Geopolitical risk: President Donald Trumps tariff threats against several European countries in an effort to pressure negotiations over Greenland have roiled markets, driving investors toward gold as a hedge against political disruption and trade instability.

  • Safe-haven demand: Global equities and bond markets weakened amid rising trade tensions and volatility, reinforcing golds role as a refuge in times of stress.

  • Dollar and rate dynamics: A softer U.S. dollar and expectations of accommodative monetary policy have reduced the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold.

  • Structural factors: Central bank purchases and sustained investment demand, including flows into gold exchange-traded products, have helped underpin prices after a dramatic rally in 2025.

Is the rally sustainable?

Forecasts vary widely on the sustainability of golds current surge:

  • Bullish views: Some analysts argue that the fundamental forces supporting gold remain intact. Continued geopolitical uncertainty, ongoing central bank accumulation, and persistent demand from both institutional and retail investors could keep prices elevated through 2026 and possibly beyond. Major banks have even raised forecasts that anticipate gold approaching $5,000 per ounce later this year.

  • Cautionary signals: Others warn that the extraordinary run could invite corrections if macroeconomic conditions change. A resurgent U.S. dollar, stronger economic growth, higher interest rates, or a resolution of key geopolitical flashpoints could dampen safe-haven flows and reduce speculative demand. Gold historically also experiences periods of fatigue when investors rotate into other assets.

What investors should watch

Market watchers say the next few months will be critical for golds trajectory:

  • Central bank policy decisions, especially from the Federal Reserve, remain pivotal in shaping risk appetite and real yields.

  • Geopolitical developments, including trade negotiations and global security concerns, will continue to influence demand for safe havens.

  • Market sentiment and technical factors, such as ETF flows and positioning by large speculators, can amplify short-term moves.

Whether golds breakout this week marks the start of a sustained bull market or a temporary spike driven by headline risk, the metals performance highlights the deep uncertainty in global markets early in 2026.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Mortgage rates still expected to stabilize in 2026, not plunge
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:07:07 +0000

But affordability continues to be the wild card

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs
January 21, 2026
  • Experts expect U.S. mortgage rates to remain largely above 6% through 2026, with only modest declines compared with 2025.

  • Economic uncertainty and Treasury yields not just Federal Reserve policy will heavily influence how far and fast rates fall.

  • Regional and market differences mean some buyers could see affordability improve faster than others.


As 2026 gets underway, the outlook for U.S. mortgage rates points to a year of relative stabilization rather than dramatic decline, economists and industry analysts say. After the long climb to historically high levels in recent years, most forecasts suggest the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate will cluster around the low 6% range, offering modest relief compared with recent peaks but not a return to pandemic-era lows.

Major forecasting agencies, including Fannie Mae, the National Association of Realtors (NAR), and the Mortgage Bankers Association, project 2026 rates averaging roughly 6.0%6.3% only slightly below where they stood at the start of the year. Some scenarios envision rates dipping just below 6% by years end if inflation continues to cool and market conditions remain favorable.

Whats driving the rate outlook

Mortgage rates dont move in lockstep with Federal Reserve policy, and experts caution against assuming that Fed rate cuts alone will bring deep decreases. Instead, long-term Treasury yields which mortgage rates tend to follow and broader economic signals like inflation and job growth will be central to rate behavior in 2026.

If you find the right home and can afford the monthly payments, you should take the opportunity in front of you, Greg Schwartz, CEO of Tomo Mortgage, told Forbes. If rates decline, competition will increase. More buyers will reenter the market, sellers will regain leverage, and prices will follow.

Affordability still an issue

A key silver lining for homebuyers is that even modest rate declines could improve affordability especially when combined with slower home price growth and rising incomes, forecasts suggest. Some housing market analysts foresee that monthly mortgage payments could become measurably more manageable compared with previous years, even if rates stay above 6%.

Regional disparities are also expected. Markets with higher inventory and slower price growth might see sharper improvements in buyer access and affordability than high-demand urban areas.

Market reactions and volatility

Although the broader trend points toward a relatively stable 2026, short-term volatility remains possible. Recent movements in mortgage rates have shown the impact of political, economic, and global influences: markets briefly saw rates dip below 6% after major mortgage-backed securities purchases, but they have also climbed in response to geopolitical and financial developments.

For prospective homebuyers and those considering refinancing this year, the message from experts is one of measured optimism. Rates are likely to remain elevated by historical standards meaning borrowing costs wont fall back to ultra-low levels but are also unlikely to spike sharply higher absent unexpected economic stress.

As a result, buyers may find more manageable mortgage costs in 2026 compared with the last two years, especially if they lock in rates and dont wait for a rate trough that may never arrive.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Trump signs executive order barring Wall Street from buying single-family homes
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:07:07 +0000

The move is designed to increase supply for homebuyers and lower prices

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs
January 21, 2026
  • President Trump signed an executive order aimed at blocking private equity firms from purchasing single-family homes, framing the move as a way to ease housing costs for families.

  • The order directs federal regulators to redefine large-scale investor activity in residential housing and restrict access to federally backed financing for such purchases.

  • Industry groups warned the measure could disrupt rental markets, while housing advocates praised it as a long-awaited intervention.


Investors have always purchased homes as rental property to provide an extra income stream. But the practice went into overdrive during the 2009-10 housing market crash, when foreclosures flooded the market with cheap single-family homes.

Private equity firms moved in with cash and scooped up many of the homes, effectively taking them off the market and keeping home prices high. Now, thats about to change.

President Donald Trump has signed a sweeping executive order banning private equity firms and other large institutional investors from buying single-family homes, a move the White House said is designed to curb rising housing costs and restore access to homeownership for middle-class Americans.

The order directs the Treasury Department, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development to take coordinated action to prevent private equity firms from acquiring single-family homes. Among other steps, the administration will bar such firms from using federally backed mortgages, restrict bulk purchases of homes financed through government-linked programs, and require enhanced disclosure of residential real estate holdings by large investment entities.

New data reveal the market is already shifting back to favoring buyers.There were an estimated 47.1% more home sellers than buyers in the U.S. housing market in December (or 631,535 more, in numerical terms)the largest gap in records dating back to 2013, according to real estate broker Redfin.Thats up 7.1 percentage points from a month earlierthe largest monthly increase since September 2022and up 22.2 percentage points from a year earlier.

Small landlords not affected

Administration officials said the policy is narrowly targeted at large-scale investors and does not apply to small landlords or individuals who own a limited number of rental properties. The White House also emphasized that the order would not force firms to sell existing holdings, though it encourages agencies to study incentives for divestment over time.

Housing advocates applauded the announcement, saying institutional investors have distorted local markets, particularly in fast-growing metropolitan areas. However, the private equity industry reacted sharply.

Trade groups warned that restricting investor participation could reduce the supply of rental housing and lead to higher rents, especially in communities where homeownership rates are already low.

Economists were divided on the likely impact. Some said the order could modestly increase housing availability for first-time buyers, while others cautioned that broader affordability problems including limited new construction and high interest rates would remain unresolved.

The executive order takes effect immediately, though legal challenges are widely expected.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Mercedes-Benz faces $150 million penalty for cheating on emissions
Wed, 21 Jan 2026 02:07:07 +0000

Similar to the VW "Dieselgate" scandal, it's a black eye for Benz.

By News Desk of ConsumerAffairs
January 20, 2026

Mercedes-Benz will pay a $150 million settlement for concealing emission-cheating devices on its cars and trucks. Consumers who owned one of the affected models will get $2,000 each.

In the settlement with 48states and two U.S. territories, prosecutors said that Mercedes manufactured, marketed,advertisedand distributed nationwide more than 211,000 diesel passenger cars and vans equipped with software defeat devices thatoptimizedemission controls during emissions tests, while reducing those controls outside of normal operations.

The states allege the defeat devices enabled vehicles to farexceedmanylegallimits of nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions, a harmful pollutant that causes respiratory illness and contributes to the formation of smog. Mercedes allegedly engaged in this conduct to achieve design and performance goals, such as increased fuel efficiency and reduced maintenance, that it was unable to meet whilecomplying withapplicable emission standards.

Mercedes concealed the existence of these defeat devices from state and federal regulators and the public. At the same time, Mercedes marketed the vehicles to consumers as environmentally-friendly and in compliance with applicable emissions regulations.

Time to pay up

Thesettlement requires Mercedes-Benz to pay $120 million to the statesimmediatelyupon the effective date of the settlement. Anadditional$29,673,750 will be suspended and potentially waived pending completion of a comprehensive consumer relief program.

The consumer relief program extends to the estimated 39,565 vehicles,which as of Aug.1, 2023,had not been repaired or permanently removed from the road in the United States. Mercedes must bear the cost of installing approved emission modification software on each of theaffected vehicles. The company must provide consumers with an extended warranty and will pay consumers $2,000 per subject vehicle.

The company must alsocomply withreporting requirements and reforms toitspractices, including a prohibition on any further engagement in unfair or deceptive marketing or sale of diesel vehicles, misrepresentationsregardingemissions and compliance.

Todays settlement follows similar settlements reached previously between the states and Volkswagen, FiatChryslerand German engineering company Robert Bosch GmbH over its development of the cheat software. Automaker Fiat Chrysler and its subsidiaries paid $72.5 million to the states in 2019. Bosch paid $98.7 million in 2019. Volkswagen reached a $570 million settlement with the states in 2016.

Read the complainthereand the judgementhere.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Raising taxes on sugary drinks, alcohol can lead to lasting health changes, WHO says
Tue, 20 Jan 2026 23:07:08 +0000

New warnings link low drink prices to rising chronic disease worldwide

By Kristen Dalli of ConsumerAffairs
January 20, 2026

  • The World Health Organization says alcohol and sugary drinks are getting too cheap, and thats bad for public health.

  • WHO wants governments to significantly raise and redesign taxes to make these drinks less affordable and reduce disease.

  • Higher taxes can improve health and raise money for health services, helping prevent obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and injuries.


Sugary drinks and alcoholic beverages might seem like everyday treats, but according to a new announcement by the World Health Organization (WHO), their low prices are doing more harm than youd think.

The WHO recently released global reports showing that cheap sodas, sweet drinks, and alcohol are contributing to rising rates of obesity, diabetes, heart disease, some cancers, and injury especially among young people.

The reason? In most countries, taxes on these products are too low or poorly designed to keep up with inflation and income growth, so theyve become more affordable over time and that encourages people to drink more.

Health taxes are one of the strongest tools we have for promoting health and preventing disease," Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, said in a news release.

"By increasing taxes on products like tobacco, sugary drinks, and alcohol, governments can reduce harmful consumption and unlock funds for vital health services.

What WHO is recommending and why it matters

The WHO isnt just pointing fingers its offering a solution. Its reports call for governments to raise and rethink taxes on alcohol and sugary drinks, so their prices reflect the real cost they impose on health systems and communities.

Here are some of the issues the WHO highlighted:

  • Many harmful drinks escape taxation: While sodas are often taxed in about 116 countries, other high-sugar products such as fruit juices, sweetened milks, and ready-to-drink coffees often arent. That means people can swap to these options without a tax penalty.

  • Alcohol remains too cheap in many places: Even though around 167 countries tax alcoholic beverages, taxes often havent kept pace with the cost of living or incomes. Wine, for instance, isnt taxed at all in some countries.

  • Low taxes mean more consumption: And more consumption is linked with preventable diseases and injuries that burden families and health systems alike.

What consumers need to know (and do)

So, what does this mean for consumers?

  • Prices may rise:If your country adopts stronger health taxes, you could see higher prices on soda, sweetened drinks and alcohol in the coming years. Thats partly the point costing more can help curb overconsumption.

  • Health benefits may follow:Higher prices have been linked with lower consumption and better health outcomes in places that have tried similar taxes.

  • Awareness matters: Knowing how your government taxes these products can empower you to support policies that promote public health or make informed choices about how much and how often you indulge.

In short: this isnt just about prices at the checkout. Its about shaping habits and protecting health one tax at a time.


Read More ...


Related Bing News Results
Consumer Reports’ Rich, 90-Year History Comes to Life at Duke University
Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:30:00 GMT
The Consumer Reports Archives,” a new exhibit at Duke University’s David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library, celebrates the nine-decade influence of Consumer Reports through its research, ...

Consumer Reports investigation: Testing protein powders
Thu, 15 Jan 2026 02:41:00 GMT
Consumer Reports tested five reader-requested chocolate protein powders: Clean Simple Eats, Equate from Walmart, Premier Protein, Ritual, and Truvani.

Stay home and kick that cold | Consumer Reports
Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:56:00 GMT
A runny nose, scratchy throat, and deep cough can make even simple daily tasks feel miserable. While there’s no instant cure for the common cold, Consumer Reports says there are several effective ways ...

Consumer Reports experts test protein powders for lead levels
Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:15:00 GMT
Last year, a Consumer Reports investigation found concerning levels of lead in some popular protein powders—raising big questions for the millions of people who use them every day.

How Much Lead Is in Protein Powder? Consumer Reports Shares Latest Findings
Wed, 14 Jan 2026 02:12:00 GMT
Consumer Reports has released its newest findings on lead and heavy metal content in protein powders. After data revealed high levels of lead in several protein powders in 2025, Consumer Reports ...


Blow Us A Whistle


Related Product Search/Búsqueda de productos relacionados

Amazon Logo