Consumer News: What impact are data centers having on your electric bill?

Where its cheapest and how to save money

• A new analysis shows the McDonald's Big Arch ranges from about $7.46 to $12.99 depending on the city a price gap of more than $5 for the exact same burger.

• Places like Lewiston, Maine ($12.99) and Juneau, Alaska ($11.49) top the list, largely due to higher transportation, labor, and operating costs.

• Pay less by using their app for digital deals, check prices at nearby locations, and consider combo or promo bundles, which can knock several dollars off.

McDonalds new Big Arch burger has gone viral after their CEO did a taste test where it appeared hed never actually eaten one of their products before.

If youve had the chance to attack a Big Arch, you may have noticed that the price can change a lot depending on where you live.

A new pricing analysis of major American cities shows the Big Arch ranges from about $7.46 to nearly $13, depending on location. Thats a price swing of more than $5 for the exact same menu item.

For budget-minded fast-food fans, that difference matters.

Where the Big Arch costs the most

The most expensive cities skew heavily toward smaller or remote markets where transportation and operating costs are higher.

The priciest Big Arch burgers include:

• Lewiston, Maine $12.99
• Juneau, Alaska $11.49
• Pearl City, Hawaii $11.29
• Spokane, Washington $11.29
• Tucson, Arizona $10.52

Cities like Seattle, Anchorage, and Missoula also top the list with prices above $10.

Where its the cheapest

On the flip side, several Southern and Midwest cities offer noticeably lower prices.

The five cheapest Big Arch burgers were found in:

• Columbia, South Carolina $7.46
• Milwaukee, Wisconsin $7.66
• Fort Worth, Texas $7.69
• Lexington, Kentucky $7.69
• Indianapolis, Indiana $7.82

Interestingly, many cities in Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana cluster near the bottom of the price list.

Big cities fall in the middle

I would have thought that major east and west coast metro areas would have been toward the top of the list.

But in actuality, they mostly land somewhere in the middle.

Examples include:

• New York City $9.82
• San Diego $9.76
• San Jose $9.46
• San Francisco $9.29
• Los Angeles $9.19

Even within pricey California, prices vary quite a bit depending on the city.

Why prices vary so much

Fast-food prices are set largely by local franchise owners, not corporate headquarters. That means operators adjust prices based on local costs such as:

• Labor wages
• Rent and property costs
• Supply and transportation expenses
• Local demand

Remote locations like Alaska and Hawaii tend to have some of the highest prices because ingredients travel farther to reach restaurants.

How to pay less for the Big Arch

Even if your city is on the pricey side, there are still ways to lower the cost.

• Use the McDonalds app. The app frequently runs digital deals and buy-one-get-one offers that can shave several dollars off their premium burgers.
• Look for bundle meals. The burger will typically costs less when purchased as part of a combo or promotional meal.
• Check nearby locations.Prices can vary between different franchise locations in the same area. This is especially true when comparing the prices at suburban vs. downtown McDonalds locations.
• Watch for limited-time deals. New menu items often appear in short-term promotions or value bundles shortly after launch.

Expert weigh in

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs

• Since 2020, the average U.S. residential electric bill has increased 29.3%, as energy demand climbs with the rapid expansion of AI-powered data centers.

• Experts say utilities are investing billions in new power generation and transmission to meet data center demand, and those costs are often spread across all ratepayers, including households.

• Policymakers say new rate structures and requiring tech companies to fund their own power needs could help prevent residential customers from subsidizing data center electricity use.

Since 2020, residential electric bills have soared. The rising bills coincide with the rapid construction of large data centers that power artificial intelligence.

A ConsumerAffairs analysis of the Energy Information Administrations Electric Power Monthly reports found that the average residential electric bill has risen 29.3%.

An analysis of Consumer Price Index data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the same years shows a similar rise, including a spike during 2022 and 2023, when inflation reached a multi-year high.

Phil Odonkor, power grid and energy sustainability expert from Stevens Institute of Technology, says its a simple matter of supply and demand.

There is not enough new power to meet the rising demand, which is hiking up prices,Odonkor told ConsumerAffairs.

Chris Black is the CEO of GridX, a company that works with utility companies on rate design for consumers. Black said data centers consume a lot of electricity and residential customers are subsidizing a lot of it. But he says data centers dont have to be the villain.

With the right rate structures things like long-term contracts, minimum demand commitments, and smarter tariff design that incentivizes data centers to flex their load during peak periods utilities can actually protect residential customers and keep bills in check, Black said. That's the direction this industry needs to move tools and rate structures that put people first, not as an afterthought."

Sudden spike

For two decades, electricity demand was relatively flat. Utility companies didnt see the need to build capacity as a rapid rate. But utilities in states with the fastest growth in data centers, bills have spiked.

In states like Virginiathe world's largest data center hubhousehold bills in some regions have already soared by 267% over the last five years as utilities scramble to keep up with the load, said Greg Field, owner of PGT Home Energy Solutions.

Arif Gasilov, partner at Gasilov Group, a firm that works on energy regulatory and sustainability strategy, says utilities are filing massive capital spending plans to serve projected loads, and those infrastructure costs get spread across all ratepayers, including residential customers.

In Nevada, for example, NV Energy's latest resource plan projects a 47% increase in electricity demand driven almost entirely by data center growth, and its Greenlink transmission project ballooned from $2.5 billion to $4.2 billion, with roughly 80% of that line's capacity committed to data center operators.

Meanwhile residential customers in the same service territory just got a new daily demand charge. The cost allocation question of whether data center operators are paying their fair share of the grid buildout they're driving, or whether residential and small commercial customers are subsidizing it, is one that utility commissions are only starting to discuss.

Fox Swim, senior solar industry researcher at Aurora Solar, agrees that the rapid buildout of AI data centers is driving a surge in electricity demand.

Expect volatile energy prices

There are an incredible number of factors that will play a role in whether energy prices change this year, most of which are not clear yet, Swim told us. Regardless of how this plays out, consumers can probably expect that energy prices will be quite volatile this year, with an overall trend upward."

National policymakers have taken notice. President Trump addressed the issue during last months State of the Union address.

Many Americans are also concerned that energy demand from AI data centers could unfairly drive up their electric utility bills, Trump said, announcing efforts to require major technology firms to provide for their own power needs when they construct data centers.

Three Senate Democrats also sent letters to seven large tech firms, calling on them to provide support for residential utility customers who are facing rising bills.

New policy aims to reduce cabin noise and improve the onboard experience

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs

• United Airlines will require passengers to use headphones when listening to audio on personal devices during flights.

• The policy aims to reduce cabin noise and improve the onboard experience, according to the airline.

• Passengers who refuse may be asked to stop using their devices audio functions during the flight.

United Airlines is rolling out a new onboard etiquette rule that will require passengers to wear headphones when listening to audio or watching videos on personal devices, a move the carrier says is intended to reduce cabin disturbances and improve the flying experience.

The policy, which applies to smartphones, tablets, laptops, and handheld gaming devices, prohibits passengers from playing audio through external speakers while onboard. Travelers who want to watch movies, listen to music, or play games with sound must use headphones or earbuds.

Airlines have increasingly faced complaints from passengers about others playing videos or music out loud during flights. United said the new rule is meant to address those concerns and bring consistency to expectations for in-flight behavior.

Shared cabin space means shared courtesy, the airline said in a statement announcing the policy. Requiring headphones helps ensure that customers can relax, work, or sleep without unnecessary noise.

Violators can be removed from the flight

Under the new rule, flight attendants may remind passengers to use headphones if audio is audible to others nearby. If a traveler does not have headphones available, they may be asked to mute their device.

United already provides headphones for passengers using seat-back entertainment systems on many aircrafts, and the airline noted that some flights may have earbuds available for purchase.

The airline said the rule will apply throughout the flight, including during boarding and taxiing, when many passengers begin watching videos or listening to music while settling into their seats.

Growing source of tension

Etiquette issues related to personal electronics have become a growing source of tension in crowded cabins. Complaints about passengers using speakerphone, playing games with loud sound effects, or streaming videos without headphones have become common topics on travel forums and social media.

Travel analysts say formalizing the expectation could help cabin crews address the issue more easily.

United said it will communicate the policy through pre-flight announcements, onboard messaging, and updates to its customer guidelines. The airline expects the rule to take effect across its network in the coming months.

The meals were sold under brand names that include Trader Joes and Kroger

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs

• Ajinomoto Foods North America has expanded a recall of frozen meals to nearly 37 million pounds of products due to possible glass contamination.

• The recall includes chicken and pork fried rice, ramen, and dumpling products sold under brands such as Trader Joes, Kroger, Ling Ling, Tai Pei, and Ajinomoto.

• Consumers are urged not to eat the products and instead throw them away or return them to the store.

Ajinomoto Foods North America has dramatically expanded a nationwide recall of frozen meals after consumer complaints about glass found in some products.

The Portland, Oregon-based company is now recalling about 36.9 million pounds of frozen ready-to-eat (RTE) and not-ready-to-eat (NRTE) chicken and pork products, according to an announcement from the U.S. Department of Agricultures Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

The expansion adds 33,617,045 pounds of products to a recall first announced Feb. 19, bringing the total volume affected to nearly 37 million pounds.

The recalled items include fried rice, ramen, and shu mai dumplings produced between Oct. 21, 2024, and Feb. 26, 2026. They were sold under several brand names, including Ajinomoto, Kroger, Ling Ling, Tai Pei, and Trader Joes.

Products carry best-by dates ranging from Feb. 28, 2026, through Aug. 19, 2027, and bear establishment numbers P-18356, P-18356B, or P-47971 inside the USDA mark of inspection.

The frozen meals were shipped to retail locations nationwide, and some Ajinomoto-branded items were also exported to Canada and Mexico.

Source of contamination

The recall was triggered after the company notified regulators that it had received multiple consumer complaints reporting pieces of glass in the food.

An investigation found that the likely source of the contamination was carrots used as a vegetable ingredient, which may have introduced glass fragments into the affected products.

So far, no injuries have been confirmed, but federal officials say anyone concerned about possible injury should contact a health care provider.

What consumers should do

FSIS warns that some of the products may still be stored in retailers inventories or in consumers freezers.

Consumers who purchased the affected products should not eat them. Instead, they should throw them away or return them to the place of purchase for a refund.

The agency said it will conduct recall effectiveness checks to ensure retailers remove the products and customers are properly notified.

Consumers with questions can contact Ajinomoto Foods North America Consumer Affairs at (855) 742-5011 or email customercare@ajinomotofoods.com. Food safety questions can also be directed to the USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline at 888-674-6854.