Consumer News: ER or urgent care? How to make the right call when it matters most

Volkswagen, Mack, and Chrysler are part of this week's recalls

Proposed 2035 ban on PFAS pesticides aims to reduce toxic exposure and reshape how produce is grown nationwide

• California is considering a bill that would ban PFAS (forever chemical) pesticides by 2035.

• These chemicals are widespread in agriculture and have been found on a significant portion of produce.

• The move could impact food safety, farming practices, and what consumers buy at the grocery store.

California is once again stepping into the spotlight on chemical safety this time with a proposed bill that would phase out so-called forever chemicals in pesticides by 2035.

Known as PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), these chemicals are used in a wide range of products, including agriculture, because they resist heat, water, and breakdown. But that durability is exactly what worries scientists and public health advocates: PFAS can linger in the environment and the human body for years.

The urgency behind the bill comes as new data highlights just how common these chemicals are in the food supply. A recent analysis found that nearly 40% of non-organic fruits and vegetables grown in California contain traces of PFAS pesticides. With California producing more than half of the nations produce, that has implications far beyond the state.

The country depends on California for its fruits and vegetables, but right now theyre being seasoned with chemicals that never break down, Bernadette Del Chiaro, the Environmental Working Groups (EWGs) senior vice president for California, said in a news release.

We cannot claim to lead the world in public health while allowing millions of pounds of toxic PFAS to be deliberately sprayed on our most iconic crops, she said.

What the bill would do

The proposed legislation would ban the use, sale, and manufacture of PFAS in pesticides by 2035, giving farmers time to transition to safer alternatives. It targets a lesser-known but significant source of exposure: agricultural chemicals applied directly to crops.

PFAS pesticides have been widely used in California for years. Between 2018 and 2023 alone, nearly 15 million pounds were applied to farmland across the state. These chemicals dont easily break down and can accumulate in soil, water, and food raising concerns about long-term health risks, including links to cancer, reproductive issues, and immune system effects.

While some states like Maine have already moved to ban PFAS in pesticides, Californias size and influence make this proposal especially significant. If passed, it could set a new national standard and push federal regulators to follow suit.

As a father, I don't want my kids eating strawberries contaminated with chemicals that will stay in their bodies for decades, Assemblymember Nick Schultz (D-Burbank), who introduced the bill, said in a news release.

AB 1603 is a vital step toward ensuring Californias agricultural legacy is defined by health and innovation, not by the accumulation of toxic PFAS in our soil and water. We are providing a clear, responsible road map for our farmers to transition away from these persistent chemicals, while re-establishing California as a global leader in food safety.

What consumers should know

For shoppers, this bill is ultimately about reducing everyday exposure to chemicals that are hard to avoid. While the proposed ban is still years away, there are a few simple steps you can take now if this issue hits close to home.

Washing produce thoroughly can help remove some surface residues, and choosing organic options when possible may reduce exposure, since PFAS pesticides arent allowed in organic farming.

But experts stress that the benefits of eating fruits and vegetables still far outweigh the risks so this isnt a reason to cut them out.

The bigger picture? This bill reflects a growing shift toward tighter regulation of chemicals in food production. If it passes, it could mean cleaner farming practices and, eventually, a safer food supply for everyone.

Is Lowes HomeCare+ actually worth $99 a year?

• Lowes new HomeCare+ plan costs $99 a year and includes two in-home maintenance visits.

• Services include basics like dryer vent cleaning, water heater flushing, and filter replacement.

• It could be worth it for homeowners who put off upkeep, but check availability and compare it to DIY costs first.

Lowes is rolling out a new home maintenance subscription service called HomeCare+, offering homeowners two in-home service visits per year for $99 annually.

The plan, available to MyLowes Rewards members in areas covering more than 75% of U.S. homes, includes up to seven basic maintenance services per visit, performed by Lowes red vest associates.

The maintenance services they offer include the following seven items:

1. Dryer vent cleaning
2. HVAC filter replacement
3. Refrigerator water filter replacement
4. Water heater flushing
5. Garage door lubrication
6. Smoke detector battery replacement
7. Light bulb replacement.

You can actually select all seven maintenance items for one visit if needed.

Subscribers also get Gold Status in MyLowes Rewards and 5% off select supplies tied to those services.

For homeowners, the program could make sense if you regularly put off basic maintenance or simply do not want to climb ladders, crawl behind appliances, or perhaps youre a senior and cant handle routine upkeep yourself.

It comes out to about $8.25 per month, which may be cheaper than hiring a handyman for even one visit.

Actionable tips for shoppers:

• Be selective. Use the service for the maintenance chores you actually dread and avoid the most. Things like dryer vent cleaning or water heater flushing jump to mind, as they can both be time consuming, yet can improve safety and appliance efficiency.
• Check your area first. Be sure to check your zip code before subscribing. Lowes initially claims to only have this service reach 75% of U.S. homes, so make sure your address is included.
• Compare the value to your own DIY habits. If you already replace filters and batteries yourself, the subscription may not be worth it. But for older adults, busy families, or first-time homeowners, who want the peace of mind that routine maintenance will get done, it could definitely be worth the $99 annually.
• Beprepared for a sales pitch. It stands that the repair person could try to upsell you on more expensive filters, bulbs, batteries, or replacement parts. Know what's a good price before you agree to buy anything.

The bottom line: Lowes is clearly trying to turn routine home maintenance into a subscription business; one theyre hoping you set and forget.

But for the right homeowner, the subscription could be a smart way to stay on top of small tasks before they become expensive repairs.

The move defies expectations during a geopolitical crisis

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs

• Gold is falling despite geopolitical turmoil as investors flock to the U.S. dollar instead.

• Higher interest rates and inflation expectations are undercutting golds appeal.

• Analysts say macroeconomic forces are overwhelming golds traditional safe-haven role.

Theres war in the Middle East. Oil prices are surging. Gold prices should also be surging, but theyre not. Theyre going down.

Gold, long regarded as a reliable refuge during times of geopolitical upheaval, is defying expectations. Even as tensions escalate in the Middle East, prices for the precious metal have moved sharply lower, leaving some investors puzzled.

Market analysts say the explanation lies not in a breakdown of golds traditional role, but in the unusual economic dynamics surrounding the current crisis.

Dollar strength is one reason gold is going lower

Instead of flowing into gold, capital is pouring into the U.S. dollar, which has surged as global investors seek liquidity and safety. Because gold is priced in dollars, a stronger greenback makes the metal more expensive for buyers using other currencies, dampening demand.

This shift points to a key reality: gold is not the only safe haven. In periods of financial stress, especially those tied to energy markets and global trade, cash and particularly dollar-denominated assets can take precedence.

Another major factor weighing on gold is the outlook for interest rates.

The conflict has driven oil prices higher, raising concerns about renewed inflation. In turn, investors increasingly believe central banks especially the Federal Reserve will keep interest rates elevated for longer than previously expected.

Higher rates are negative for gold

That dynamic is typically negative for gold. Unlike bonds or savings instruments, gold does not generate income. When yields on safer assets rise, the opportunity cost of holding gold increases.

While gold is often viewed as a hedge against inflation, the current environment is more complex, analysts say.

Mark Haefele, chief investment officer at UBS Global Wealth Management, says weve seen this pattern before.

For instance, gold jumped 15% after the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022, but then declined by 15-18% as the Federal Reserve raised rates, he told Morningstar. The same happened during the Gulf War and Iraq War; prices rose 17% and 19%, respectively, at the start but decreased as tensions eased.

Higher energy prices are feeding inflation fears, but they are also reinforcing expectations of tighter monetary policy. In the short term, that combination tends to pressure gold rather than support it.

In other words, inflation is working against gold indirectly by keeping interest rates high.

Profit-taking and liquidity pressures add to the decline

Golds recent drop also reflects investor behavior following a strong run-up earlier this year. Prices had climbed significantly before the latest escalation, prompting some traders to lock in gains.

At the same time, periods of market volatility often trigger broader selling. Investors may liquidate gold positions simply because they are profitable and easy to sell, using the proceeds to cover losses elsewhere or raise cash.

The current downturn reinforces a broader shift in how markets are reacting to geopolitical events. While gold still responds to uncertainty, its price is increasingly influenced by interest rates, currency movements, and central bank policy. For now, those forces are pointing downward.