Consumer News: Frigidaire minifridge recall for fire hazard leads the weekly recall roundup

RootStim beard serum recall for child poisoning risk

Consumers with RootStim Beard Growth Serums should stop use and request a free replacement bottle.

Packaging lacks required child-resistant features, risking poisoning if swallowed
About 16,900 bottles sold on Amazon between November 2024 and September 2025
Consumers should stop use and contact RootStim for a replacement

RootStim Beard Growth Serum sold on Amazon is being recalled due to packaging that does not meet child safety standards. The serum contains minoxidil and poses a serious risk if ingested by young children.

The hazard

The beard growth serum is required by law to be in child-resistant packaging. The recalled bottles are not, creating a risk of poisoning if the contents are swallowed by children.

What to do

Consumers should stop using the product immediately and contact RootStim for a free child-resistant replacement bottle.

Company contact

RootStim at 202-743-1714 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, email at finergraceing@gmail.com, or visit https://rootstim.com and click Contact Us for more information.

Source

Greatale self-feeding pillows recall for infant suffocation risk

Parents should stop using Greatale self-feeding pillows sold on Amazon and request a refund.

Pillows can cause aspiration and suffocation in infants
About 1,260 pillows sold on Amazon from September 2024 through July 2025
Stop use and contact Greatale for a refund

Greatale self-feeding pillows, designed to hold bottles in place for infants, are being recalled due to the risk of suffocation and aspiration. These pillows were sold online on Amazon and should not be used.

The hazard

The pillow holds the bottle at an unsafe angle and keeps it fixed so infants cannot pull away. This design can cause milk or formula aspiration, increasing the risk of suffocation.

What to do

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled pillows and contact Greatale to obtain a refund.

Company contact

Email Greatale at greatale-recall@outlook.com.

Source

HEZI power strips recall for electrocution hazard

Owners of HEZI brand power strips should unplug and return the product for a refund.

Power strips have ungrounded metal enclosures that can cause electrocution
About 1,320 units sold on major online retailers from May 2024 to October 2025
Consumers should stop use and request a refund

HEZI brand power strips sold on Amazon, Ebay, Kmart and Sears are recalled due to a risk of electric shock or death. The metal enclosure is not grounded and may become energized.

The hazard

The recalled power strips have a metal enclosure that lacks proper grounding. If energized, this poses a serious electrocution risk.

What to do

Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled power strips and contact HEZI HOME for a refund.

Company contact

HEZI HOME toll-free at 602-804-6830 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, email recall_hezi@163.com, or visit amazon.com/hezi and click Product Recalls.

Source

Morgan Lane childrens pajamas recall for burn hazard

Parents should stop using Morgan Lane Asher Pajama Sets and request a refund due to flammability risk.

Pajamas do not meet flammability standards, risking serious burns to children
About 95 pajama sets sold online from March 2024 to May 2025
Consumers should stop use and contact Morgan Lane for a refund

Morgan Lane, LLC is recalling certain childrens Asher Pajama Sets due to failure to meet mandatory flammability standards for sleepwear, posing a serious risk of burns.

The hazard

The recalled pajamas violate federal flammability standards, creating a risk of serious or fatal burns to children.

What to do

Consumers should immediately stop using the pajamas and contact Morgan Lane for a refund.

Company contact

Email info@morgan-lane.com or visit www.morgan-lane.com and click Recall for more information.

Source

Adams Adirondack patio chairs recall for fall and injury risk

Users of Adams RealComfort or StyleWell Adirondack patio chairs from Lowes or Home Depot should stop use and get a refund.

Chairs can crack and collapse, posing injury and fall hazards
About 6,100 units sold nationwide from August to October 2025
Stop using affected chairs and contact Adams Manufacturing for a refund

Adams Manufacturing Corp. is recalling select Adirondack-style patio chairs sold under Adams RealComfort and StyleWell brands due to a risk of cracking and collapse, which may cause falls or injuries.

The hazard

The recalled resin patio chairs can crack and collapse during use, creating a risk of falls and injury.

What to do

Consumers should stop using the chairs immediately and contact Adams Manufacturing to request a refund.

Company contact

Call Adams Manufacturing toll-free at 866-546-1806 from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, email recalls@adamsmfg.com, or visit www.adamsmfg.com/recalls for details.

Source

KEAWIS crib mattress recall for infant suffocation hazard

Parents should stop using KEAWIS crib mattresses and contact Yixing Trading for a refund.

Mattresses violate crib safety standards and may cause entrapment or suffocation
About 1,500 units sold on Amazon between August 2024 and July 2025
Stop using the mattress and request a refund from Yixing Trading

KEAWIS crib mattresses sold by Yixing Trading are being recalled because they may not fit certain play yards or cribs properly, creating dangerous gaps that can cause entrapment or suffocation.

The hazard

The aftermarket mattresses may leave gaps in play yards or non-full-sized cribs, violating federal safety standards and posing a risk of deadly entrapment or suffocation.

What to do

Consumers should stop using the recalled mattresses and contact Yixing Trading for a refund.

Company contact

Email support@keawis.com for information on receiving a refund.

Source

R.X.Y bicycle helmets recall for head injury risk

Consumers should stop using R.X.Y adult bike helmets sold on Amazon and request a refund.

Helmets do not meet federal safety requirements and may not protect in a crash
About 170 units sold online from September to November 2025
Stop using the helmet and contact R.X.Y for a refund

R.X.Y is recalling certain adult bicycle helmets sold on Amazon because they do not meet impact and labeling standards. Use of these helmets may not provide adequate protection from head injuries.

The hazard

The helmets fail to comply with required impact attenuation, positional stability, labeling and certification standards, putting users at risk of serious head injuries or death in a crash.

What to do

Consumers should immediately stop using the helmets and contact R.X.Y for a refund.

Company contact

Email RXY-recall@outlook.com or contact R.X.Y through their Amazon.com Seller Profile.

Source

BBWOO baby loungers recall for suffocation and fall risk

Parents should stop using BBWOO baby loungers from Amazon and request a refund from LSY Direct.

Loungers violate infant sleep product standards, risking entrapment, suffocation and falls
About 11,900 units sold on Amazon from July 2024 to November 2025
Stop use and contact LSY Direct for a refund

BBWOO baby loungers sold by LSY Direct on Amazon are being recalled due to multiple safety hazards. The loungers do not meet federal safety standards for infant sleep products.

The hazard

The baby loungers have sides that are too low and openings that are too wide, increasing the risk of infants falling or becoming trapped. The lack of a stand also creates a fall hazard if used on elevated surfaces, creating a risk of death or serious injury.

What to do

Consumers should stop using the recalled baby loungers immediately and contact LSY Direct for a refund.

Company contact

Email bbwoorecall@163.com for more information.

Source

Energizer lantern recall due to battery overheating risk

Owners of Energizer Large Power Indicator Lanterns should stop use and request a refund.

Lithium-ion batteries can overheat, posing a burn hazard
About 4,100 lanterns sold nationwide between January and November 2025
Stop using and contact Energizer for a refund

Energizer Holdings is recalling its Large Power Indicator Lanterns due to the risk of battery overheating, which can cause burns. The recall affects lanterns with model BGAAL9 and date code June 2024.

The hazard

The lithium-ion batteries inside the lanterns can overheat. At least one incident of overheating has been reported, though no injuries occurred.

What to do

Consumers should immediately stop using the lanterns and contact Energizer for a refund.

Company contact

Call Energizer toll free at 800-383-7323 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, email customersupport@energizer.com, or visit https://energizer.com/lightings/lanternrecall.

Source

Liberty Trike electric tricycles warning for fall injury risk

Riders should stop using Liberty Trike electric tricycles immediately due to a tipping hazard.

Tricycles can tip over during turns, risking serious injury from falls
Sold online from October 2015 to November 2025
CPSC urges disposal and warns not to resell or give away

CPSC warns consumers to stop using Liberty Trike 16-inch and 20-inch electric tricycles due to a fall hazard. The risk is especially high when turning or riding on slopes.

The hazard

The tricycles can tip over during turns, increasing the risk of falls and serious injuries, particularly on uneven surfaces.

What to do

Consumers should immediately stop using and dispose of the tricycles. Do not sell or give the trikes away.

Company contact

Report any incidents involving injury or product defect to CPSC at www.SaferProducts.gov.

Source

Akavivo LED lights warning for battery ingestion hazard

Households should stop using Akavivo Submersible LED Lights and dispose of them immediately.

Lithium coin batteries are accessible and pose a serious ingestion hazard to children
Sold on Amazon and elsewhere between March and November 2025
CPSC urges immediate disposal and warns not to resell or give away

CPSC is alerting consumers to the dangers of Akavivo Submersible LED Lights due to easy access to lithium coin batteries, which can be swallowed by children.

The hazard

The included lithium coin batteries can be easily accessed by children, presenting a risk of battery ingestion and potentially fatal injuries.

What to do

Consumers should stop using and dispose of the LED lights immediately. Do not give away or resell the product.

Company contact

Report incidents or product defects to CPSC at www.SaferProducts.gov.

Source

JJGoo LED lights warning for button battery ingestion risk

Consumers should dispose of JJGoo Submersible LED Lights immediately due to child safety hazards.

Button cell batteries are easily accessible and lack required warnings
About 103,000 LED lights sold on Amazon from February 2020 through November 2025
CPSC urges immediate disposal and warns not to resell or give away

JJGoo Submersible LED Lights sold online are being flagged by CPSC for violating product safety standards. The lights contain button cell batteries that are easily accessible and lack required safety warnings.

The hazard

Children can access the button cell batteries in the lights, risking ingestion and potentially serious or fatal injuries. The required safety warnings are also missing.

What to do

Consumers should stop using and dispose of these LED lights immediately. Do not sell or give them away.

Company contact

Report any incidents or product defects to CPSC at www.SaferProducts.gov.

Source

Malinaggg Happy Baby toy sets warning for choking and strangulation hazards

SUBTITLE: Parents should stop using Malinaggg Happy Baby Musical Instrument toy sets and dispose of them.

Maracas and drumsticks pose choking hazard; drum strap can strangle children
About 30 sets sold on Walmart.com from February to October 2025
CPSC urges immediate disposal and warns not to resell or give away

CPSC is warning consumers about Malinaggg Happy Baby Musical Instrument toy sets due to risks of choking and strangulation. The sets include multiple instruments, some with small parts and straps.

The hazard

The maracas and drumsticks have spherical ends that can cause choking, and the drum strap can entangle around a child's neck, posing a strangulation risk.

What to do

Consumers should immediately stop using and dispose of these toy sets. Do not give away or resell the product.

Company contact

Report incidents or defects to CPSC at www.SaferProducts.gov or call 800-638-2772 (TTY 800-638-8270).

Source

Miocololy self-feeding pillow warning for infant suffocation risk

SUBTITLE: Parents should stop using Miocololy self-feeding pillows and dispose of them immediately.

Pillows hold bottles at unsafe angles, risking suffocation and aspiration in infants
Sold on Amazon from October 2024 through November 2025
CPSC urges immediate disposal and warns not to resell or give away

CPSC is warning parents about Miocololy self-feeding pillows, which can lead to suffocation and aspiration in infants. The product holds bottles in a fixed, unsafe position.

The hazard

The pillows keep bottles at an unsafe angle, preventing infants from pulling away and increasing the risk of suffocation and milk aspiration.

What to do

Consumers should stop using and dispose of these pillows immediately. Do not give away or resell the product.

Company contact

Report incidents or defects to CPSC at www.SaferProducts.gov or call 800-638-2772 (TTY 800-638-8270).

Source

Ourkiss self-feeding pillow warning for infant suffocation risk

Families should immediately stop using Ourkiss self-feeding pillows and dispose of them.

Pillows keep bottles fixed, risking suffocation and aspiration for infants
Sold on Amazon from June 2024 to July 2025
CPSC urges consumers to dispose of these pillows and avoid resale

CPSC warns that Ourkiss self-feeding pillows create a suffocation risk for infants by holding bottles in a fixed, unsafe position.

The hazard

The pillow keeps bottles at an unsafe angle, preventing infants from pulling away, which can lead to aspiration of milk or formula and suffocation.

What to do

Consumers should immediately stop using and dispose of the pillows. Do not give away or resell these hazardous products.

Company contact

Report incidents or product defects to CPSC at www.SaferProducts.gov.

Source

Yiiektily self-feeding pillow warning for infant suffocation risk

Parents should dispose of Yiiektily self-feeding pillows sold on Amazon to prevent infant harm.

Pillows pose suffocation and aspiration risk by fixing bottles in place
Sold by Yiiektily on Amazon from April 2024 to July 2025
CPSC urges immediate disposal and not to resell or give away

Yiiektily self-feeding pillows are being flagged by CPSC for potential suffocation and aspiration hazards. The pillows hold bottles at angles that are unsafe for infants.

The hazard

The design fixes bottles in front of the infant's face at an unsafe angle, increasing the risk of suffocation and aspiration.

What to do

Consumers should dispose of the pillows immediately and avoid selling or giving them away.

Company contact

Report incidents or product defects to CPSC at www.SaferProducts.gov.

Source

Get Full News Story On Consumer Affairs

Posted: 2026-01-15 20:09:27

Listen to this article. Speaker link opens in a new window.
Text To Speech BETA Test Version.

More News From This Category
Consumer News: As prices rise, buying second-hand has become a mainstream shopping habit
Thu, 08 Oct 2026 19:07:08 +0000

A new report finds secondhand purchases extend beyond thrift-store clothing

By Mark Huffman

October 8, 2026

A new survey found that 76% of Americans bought something secondhand in the past year, while nearly nine in 10 have purchased used goods at some point.
Younger consumers lead the trend, and nearly half of Americans already buy luxury items secondhand or would consider doing so.
Rising prices could encourage more resale shopping, as 53% said they would likely buy used more often if new products become more expensive.

Browsing through thrift and second-hand stores has long been an enjoyable shopping experience for a niche group of consumers. With inflation, its gone mainstream.

Buying secondhand has become a routine part of shopping for many Americans, according to a new report from The Consumer Collective.

The consumer insights and advisory firms report, Second Nature: The State of Secondhand Shopping in America, found that 76% of Americans purchased used goods during the past year. Nearly nine in 10 have bought something secondhand at some point, according to the companys announcement.

The findings suggest resale is becoming an increasingly important competitor for retailers selling new merchandise.

Younger shoppers lead

Millennials had the highest rate of secondhand purchasing in the past year, at 89%, followed by Generation Z at 85%. Among Americans age 62 and older, 59% reported buying used.

The survey also found that 44% of respondents were buying more secondhand merchandise than two years earlier. That figure reached 66% among Gen Z consumers.

Luxury goods are part of the shift. Nearly half of respondents 49% already purchase luxury items used or would consider it. That figure measures both existing buyers and potential customers, rather than current purchases alone.

Prices could push more purchases toward resale

Higher prices for new products could strengthen demand for secondhand alternatives. Some 53% of respondents said they would likely shop secondhand more often if prices for new merchandise continued rising.

For some consumers, used goods already account for a substantial share of purchases: One in three said more than a quarter of what they buy is secondhand.

Jessica Ramrez, co-founder of The Consumer Collective, said the implications extend across product categories.

Over time, we expect to see consumers gravitation towards secondhand pull spend from other retailers, Ramrez said in the announcement.

That is the firms forecast, rather than a measured decline in traditional retail sales. But the survey points to a consumer audience increasingly willing to consider previously owned merchandise when deciding where to spend.

The findings come from an online survey of 400 U.S. adults conducted in August 2026. The firm says the figures were stratified to U.S. Census demographics unless otherwise noted. The results describe respondents reported shopping habits and intentions, rather than tracked retail transactions.

As prices rise, buying second-hand has become a mainstream shopping habit

Photo By CNET

Consumer News: Used-car prices have softened heading into the end of 2026
Thu, 08 Oct 2026 19:07:08 +0000

But bargains depend on the model

By Mark Huffman

October 8, 2026

Wholesale used-vehicle prices fell in September, and Cox Automotive cut its year-end forecast to a gain of just 0.2% over December 2025.
Models worth comparing include the Buick Encore GX, Nissan Rogue, and Lincoln Corsair hybrid, which posted price declines in an earlier national study.
Affordable cars remain scarce, making financing, condition, and expected ownership costs essential parts of finding a deal.

Consumers shopping for a used vehicle during the final months of 2026 may find a more favorable market, although the latest figures offer little evidence of an across-the-board price collapse.

Cox Automotives Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index fell to 205.9 in September, down 1.1% from August and 0.6% from a year earlier, after adjustments for vehicle mix, mileage, and seasonality. The company now expects the index to finish 2026 just 0.2% above its year-end 2025 level, compared with the 2% increase it projected in July.

Higher fuel costs and interest rates helped weaken wholesale values during the third quarter. Larger pickups and SUVs experienced declining demand and values, while older, less expensive vehicles held up better. Vehicles returning from leases are also becoming more plentiful, adding supply.

We are in the weakest season for wholesale valuations, and as September closed, depreciation was steeper than we typically see this time of year, said Jeremy Robb, chief economist, Cox Automotive. The first half of the year actually showed more appreciation than usual, even in the face of higher fuel prices. But with the conflict in the Middle East ongoing, diesel prices at record highs, and interest rates climbing rapidly increasingly worrying both businesses and consumers wholesale prices have felt the sting.

Those trends suggest shoppers may find more negotiating room on larger vehicles. But the Manheim Index measures wholesale transactions between industry buyers and sellers; it does not measure what consumers pay at dealerships.

Retail prices illustrate that distinction. Autotrader reported an average used-vehicle listing price of $27,239 in August, up 7% from a year earlier. Vehicles priced below $15,000 accounted for only 15.1% of inventory and had a relatively tight 29-day supply.

Models worth putting on the shopping list

An iSeeCars analysis of one- to five-year-old vehicles provides some leads. Its June figures showed several models getting cheaper even as others increased in price.

These are historical national averages, rather than current local offers or forecasts for December. Still, the declines make these models reasonable starting points for comparison shopping. The Corsair hybrids average price fell $6,454, while the Rogue and Encore GX offer lower purchase-price entry points.

For buyers focused on affordable transportation, another iSeeCars study assessed purchase prices alongside predicted remaining vehicle life. Among five-year-old vehicles, the Honda Fit ranked first overall, while the Buick Encore led SUVs.

Other candidates included the Toyota Corolla, Hyundai Elantra, and Volkswagen Jetta. Their average listing prices in the study were $17,104, $14,312, and $16,608, respectively. The five-year-old Encore averaged $16,030. These figures came from vehicles sold during July through December 2025, so they serve as value benchmarks rather than todays price quotes. Predicted longevity also cannot guarantee the condition of an individual car.

Financing can change the deal

A certified pre-owned vehicle deserves consideration when discounted financing offsets a higher asking price.

Kelley Blue Books October roundup lists 1.99% financing for up to 36 months on eligible 20252026 HondaTrue Certified Civics, with an advertised expiration of November 2. It also lists 2.99% financing for 36 months on eligible Lincoln Certified vehicles through January 4, 2027. Buyers should verify credit requirements, vehicle eligibility, and regional availability.

Shoppers should compare the full purchase price and total borrowing cost, obtain an insurance quote, and request a breakdown of dealer charges. A vehicle history report and an independent inspection can help determine whether a discounted car represents worthwhile savings.

Waiting for December may produce additional choices, but buyers should judge each vehicle against comparable local listings. A well-maintained car at a competitive price can offer better value than a larger discount on one facing expensive repairs.

Used-car prices have softened heading into the end of 2026

Photo By CNET

Consumer News: Cash App settlement payments are going out this month
Thu, 08 Oct 2026 19:07:07 +0000

Approved claimants will receive compensation, but the deadline to apply has passed

By Mark Huffman

October 8, 2026

Payments from the $15 million Cash App security settlement are scheduled for October 2026 for approved claimants.
Eligibility covered certain customers affected by unauthorized access, transactions, or account-error resolution problems between August 23, 2018, and August 20, 2024.
The claim deadline was November 18, 2024. Consumers who already filed can contact the administrator about their payment; new claims are no longer accepted.

Cash App customers with approved claims in a security-related class action settlement are scheduled to receive payments this month, according to an update on the official settlement website.

The administrator says it has completed its review of claim deficiencies and appeals. A federal court granted final approval on March 27, 2025.

The lawsuit alleged that Block, Cash Apps parent company, and Cash App Investing failed to adequately protect customers following security incidents disclosed in 2022 and 2023. It also challenged their handling of unauthorized transactions and customer complaints.

Both companies denied wrongdoing.

Who qualified?

The settlement covered current and former customers whose personal information or accounts were accessed without permission, who experienced unauthorized or fraudulent transfers, or who had qualifying problems with account-error resolution during the covered period.

Simply having a Cash App account did not qualify someone for compensation. Receiving a payment required a timely, valid, and approved claim.

How much compensation is available?

Claimants could request up to $2,500 for documented out-of-pocket losses, up to $75 for time spent addressing covered problems, and reimbursement for documented, unreimbursed transaction losses.

The $2,500 figure is an expense-reimbursement limit, rather than a guaranteed payment. Individual awards depend on approved claims and settlement terms. Legal fees and administrative expenses are paid from the fund.

How to get a payment

Consumers who submitted claims should check CashAppSecuritySettlement.com for distribution updates. The administrator explicitly says late claim forms are no longer accepted.

For questions about an existing claim or payment, contact the Cash App Security Settlement Administrator at 1-866-615-9740. Claimants can also write to 1650 Arch Street, Suite 2210, Philadelphia, PA, 19103.

Cash App settlement payments are going out this month

Photo By CNET

Consumer News: Starbucks sued over ‘sugar-free’ protein drinks that contain sugar
Thu, 08 Oct 2026 16:07:07 +0000

Consumers challenge the beverage names, but Starbucks says its nutritional disclosures are clear

By Mark Huffman

October 8, 2026

A proposed class-action lawsuit accuses Starbucks of misleading consumers by naming eight protein beverages sugar-free despite their sugar content.
The complaint alleges the drinks contain 13 to 21 grams of sugar per venti serving, largely from naturally occurring sugar in milk.
Starbucks disputes the allegations, saying it clearly discloses nutritional information and uses sugar-free syrups in the beverages.

Starbucks is facing a proposed class-action lawsuit alleging that eight of its protein beverages are misleadingly marketed as sugar-free even though they contain substantial amounts of naturally occurring sugar.

Filed Oct. 2 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, the lawsuit challenges the names of the companys vanilla and caramel protein lattes and protein matcha drinks, including their iced versions. The plaintiffs allege the beverages contain between 13 and 21 grams of sugar per venti serving.

The dispute centers on whether consumers would understand sugar-free to describe the entire beverage or simply the syrup used to flavor it. The drinks contain milk, which supplies lactose, a naturally occurring sugar, according to the complaint.

The three consumers bringing the case purchased the beverages in California, New York, and Washington. Their attorneys argue that the product names are deceptive even when nutritional information is available elsewhere.

What the lawsuit alleges

The plaintiffs contend Starbucks beverage names violate federal labeling standards and state consumer protection laws.

Federal regulations generally require products bearing a sugar-free claim to contain less than 0.5 gram of sugar per labeled serving and per reference amount customarily consumed. The regulations establish separate requirements for no added sugar claims, recognizing that a product can contain sugar naturally present in its ingredients.

The lawsuit also alleges Starbucks failed to include required calorie disclaimers. Under the federal rule, a sugar-free claim must be accompanied by an appropriate disclaimer when the product does not qualify for specified low-calorie or reduced-calorie labeling.

The consumers, represented by Hagens Berman and Sterlington PLLC, seek compensation for purchases and a court order requiring changes to the allegedly misleading marketing. Those requests remain allegations and demands for relief, rather than findings that Starbucks violated the law.

Starbucks rejects the claims

Starbucks says the sugar comes from its protein-boosted milk, that it does not add sugar to the beverages, and that the flavoring syrups are sugar-free.

We believe these claims have no merit, a Starbucks spokesperson said.

The company said it consistently provides information about ingredients, customization options, and nutritional content through its menus, marketing, website, and app, and intends to defend itself vigorously.

For consumers, the case highlights a distinction worth checking before ordering: sugar-free syrup does not necessarily produce a beverage without sugar. Milk and other ingredients can contribute to the finished drinks total.

Customers trying to limit sugar can review the nutritional information for the complete beverage and selected serving size, paying attention to total sugars as well as any claim about added sugar.

Starbucks sued over ‘sugar-free’ protein drinks that contain sugar

Photo By CNET

Consumer News: Conagra discontinues Celeste frozen pizza
Thu, 08 Oct 2026 16:07:07 +0000

Remaining supplies will be sold as the food company shifts resources to other brands

By Mark Huffman