Consumer News: Where today's job seekers have the best chance of getting hired

Buyers are balking at listing prices that inflated during the pandemic

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs

• Nearly 6% of U.S. home listings were pulled off the market in April, tying the highest level since the start of the pandemic.

• Sellers are increasingly delisting homes rather than accepting lower offers in a market where buyers have gained leverage.

• Florida and Texas metros led the nation in delistings as high mortgage rates and affordability challenges continued to dampen demand.

Home listings quickly disappeared in April, but not because the properties sold. It was because they didnt sell.

A new report from real estate brokerage Redfin found that more homeowners are taking their properties off the market rather than lowering their asking prices, a sign of growing tension in a housing market that has shifted increasingly in favor of buyers.

According to the report, 5.8% of all U.S. home listings were delisted in April, tying December 2025 for the highest share since March 2020, when the housing market briefly froze at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The trend reflects a growing disconnect between sellers' price expectations and what buyers are willing or able to pay. Elevated mortgage rates and persistently high home prices have sidelined many would-be buyers, leaving homes on the market longer and forcing sellers to choose between cutting prices or waiting for better conditions.

Sellers are still getting used to the post-pandemic normal, said Patricia Ammann, a Redfin Premier agent in Arlington, Va.

Prices arent soaring like they were five years ago.High gas prices and the rising cost of living overall are trickling down to the housing market, making buyers much less likely to bid prices up. Buyers know they have negotiating power, often offering under the asking price and completing inspections, but some sellers just wont budge.

Some homeowners cant lower their price because they bought during the pandemic when prices soared well ahead of the rate of inflation.

Some homes are back on the market

The report also found that 2.5% of homes currently on the market are relistings that had previously been withdrawn, the highest share on record. That suggests many sellers are testing the market, pulling listings when demand disappoints, and returning later in hopes of more favorable conditions.

The increase in delistings comes as the national housing market continues to favor buyers. Inventory has risen in many parts of the country, giving shoppers more options and reducing the urgency that characterized the pandemic-era housing boom. At the same time, buyers have become more price-sensitive, often negotiating discounts or walking away from deals altogether.

Florida and Texas markets have the biggest disconnect

Florida and Texas have been among the markets most affected by the shift. Previous Redfin analyses have shown Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Austin, and San Antonio among the metros with the largest imbalance between sellers and buyers, creating particularly challenging conditions for homeowners hoping to sell quickly and at premium prices.

The rise in delistings may also help explain why housing inventory growth has begun to slow in some markets. As more sellers withdraw listings, fewer homes remain available for sale, potentially limiting future inventory gains even as buyer demand remains subdued.

Despite the pullback, housing analysts say affordability remains the market's central challenge. Mortgage rates remain well above pandemic lows, and home prices, while softening in some regions, are still historically high by many measures.

The case could eventually strengthen consumers privacy

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs

• The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) can continue using its existing enforcement process to impose penalties on telecommunications companies, rejecting a challenge from Verizon and AT&T.

• The 8-1 decision preserves a key regulatory tool used by the FCC to enforce data privacy and consumer protection rules.

• The ruling stems from a dispute over nearly $100 million in FCC penalties tied to the companies' handling of customer location data.

The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the Federal Communications Commissions authority to use its administrative enforcement process against telecommunications companies, dealing a setback to Verizon and AT&T in a closely watched regulatory case.

In an 8-1 decision, the Court rejected arguments from the two telecom giants that the FCCs penalty process violated their constitutional right to have disputes decided by a jury. The ruling preserves one of the agencys primary tools for enforcing federal telecommunications and data privacy laws.

For most consumers, the ruling is unlikely to have an immediate, visible impact. However, it could have important long-term consequences for privacy and consumer protection.

The case involved allegations that wireless carriers improperly shared or failed to safeguard customers' location data. By preserving the FCC's enforcement authority, the ruling makes it less likely that companies can avoid penalties through procedural challenges before regulators even reach the merits of a case.

Use of location data

The case in question arose from FCC investigations into the companies handling of customer location information. Regulators concluded that Verizon and AT&T failed to adequately protect sensitive location data and proposed penalties totaling roughly $100 million.

The carriers argued that the FCCs in-house enforcement process deprived them of due process because the agency could impose substantial penalties before the companies had an opportunity to present their case before a jury.

Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said the FCCs forfeiture orders do not themselves create an immediate legal obligation to pay. Instead, companies retain the ability to challenge the penalties in court before any final collection action occurs. As a result, the Court concluded that the process does not violate the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.

Victory for federal agencies

The decision marks a significant victory for the federal government and the FCC, which argued that administrative enforcement proceedings are essential to policing violations of telecommunications regulations. The Trump administration defended the agencys authority during the litigation.

The ruling comes at a time when the Supreme Court has scrutinized, andin some cases, limited the powers of federal agencies. However, the Court's decision suggests that certain long-standing enforcement mechanisms remain on solid constitutional footing.

Scammers increasingly post fake numbers to intercept calls

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs

• Scammers are exploiting airline travelers by creating fake customer service numbers that appear prominently in online search results.

• Passengers seeking flight status updates, rebooking help, or cancellation information are being tricked into calling fraudulent numbers, and in some cases, surrendering personal and financial information.

• Consumer advocates warn travelers to obtain airline contact information directly from airline websites, mobile apps, or boarding documents rather than relying on search results.

As flight delays, cancellations, and schedule changes continue to disrupt travel plans, some airline passengers are encountering a new threat: scammers posing as airline customer service representatives through fake phone numbers that appear in online search results.

Consumer protection experts say the scheme often begins when a traveler searches online for an airline's customer service number after receiving a notification that a flight has been delayed or canceled. Fraudsters use deceptive websites, online advertisements, and manipulated search listings to place fake contact information where frustrated passengers are likely to find it.

The scam preys on travelers who are under pressure to quickly confirm a flight's status, rebook a canceled itinerary, or secure a refund. Believing they are speaking with an airline representative, victims may provide booking confirmation numbers, credit card details, passport information, or other personal data.

According to consumer complaints and reports from cybersecurity researchers, scammers often answer calls professionally, using airline names and industry terminology to establish credibility. Some falsely claim that a ticket must be reissued immediately or that additional fees are required to secure a seat on a replacement flight.

Red flags

Victims may be asked to make payments through gift cards, peer-to-peer payment services, wire transfers, or other methods that are difficult to reverse a huge red flag. In some cases, callers are instructed to download remote-access software, giving scammers access to personal computers and sensitive information.

The problem is not limited to a single carrier. Fraudulent numbers have been reported in connection with major domestic and international airlines, particularly during periods of widespread travel disruptions when demand for customer support surges.

Search engines have taken steps to remove deceptive listings and advertisements, but cybersecurity experts say scammers frequently create new websites and phone numbers, making enforcement difficult.

Airlines typically advise passengers to use official channels for flight information and customer support, including the airline's mobile app, official website, boarding pass, or confirmation email. Many carriers also provide real-time flight status updates through their apps, reducing the need to search online for assistance.

Always use the airlines app

Recently, an Iowa family vacationing in Mexico fell victim when the airlines app didnt work properly. A family member Googled the airlines customer service number but ended up talking to a scammer, who demanded $7,000 to rectify an issue.

Consumer advocates recommend that travelers be wary of any representative who requests unusual payment methods, pressures them into making immediate decisions, or asks for sensitive information that is not necessary to verify a reservation.

As summer travel ramps up, experts say vigilance remains the best defense. A simple search for a customer service number can seem harmless, but in the wrong hands, it can become the starting point for identity theft, financial fraud, and a ruined trip.

Travelers who believe they have been targeted by such a scam should immediately contact their financial institutions, notify the airline involved, and report the incident to federal and state consumer protection authorities.

The average rate declined from its recent nine-month high

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs

• The average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage fell to 6.48% this week from 6.53%, according to Freddie Mac, marking a modest improvement for homebuyers.

• Rates remain below the 6.85% average recorded a year ago, while the average 15-year fixed mortgage declined to 5.79% from 5.87%.

• Economists say affordability is improving slightly as wage growth continues to outpace home-price growth, though mortgage rates remain elevated by historical standards.

Despite the spike in bond yields, mortgage rates eased this week, providing a small boost to prospective homebuyers as the spring housing market enters its final stretch.

Freddie Mac reports that the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage fell to 6.48% from 6.53% a week earlier. The average remains well below the 6.85% level recorded at the same time last year.

The average rate on a 15-year fixed-rate mortgage, a popular refinancing option, also declined, dropping to 5.79% from 5.87% the previous week.

The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage decreased to 6.48% this week, Freddie Mac Chief Economist Sam Khater said in the company's weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey. With mortgage rates in the mid-6% range and income growth outpacing home price growth, housing affordability is marginally improving.

Down from a nine-month high

The decline comes after mortgage rates recently climbed to their highest level in roughly nine months. While the latest drop is unlikely to dramatically alter housing demand, it could encourage some buyers who have been waiting on the sidelines for borrowing costs to ease.

Mortgage rates are influenced by several factors, including inflation expectations, Federal Reserve policy, and movements in the bond market. In particular, lenders closely track the yield on the 10-year Treasury note when setting mortgage rates. Recent economic uncertainty and concerns about inflation have kept long-term borrowing costs elevated even as rates remain below year-ago levels.

Housing market activity continues to reflect the challenge posed by higher financing costs. Existing-home sales have remained sluggish, and mortgage application activity has softened in recent weeks as many buyers and homeowners wait for lower rates.

Improving market conditions

Some market conditions are improving for buyers. Housing inventory has increased in many markets, giving shoppers more choices than they had during the pandemic-era housing boom. Some analysts also note that home-price growth has slowed, helping offset the impact of mortgage rates that remain above 6%.

Despite this week's decline, economists generally expect mortgage rates to remain in the mid-6% range for the foreseeable future. Freddie Mac's survey shows rates have fluctuated between roughly 6% and 6.5% for much of 2026, reflecting ongoing uncertainty about inflation and economic growth.

For consumers, the latest decline offers incremental relief rather than a turning point. But even small movements in mortgage rates can affect affordability, particularly for first-time buyers facing elevated home prices and borrowing costs.