Flying The Web For News.
  • Career Exam Study
    Career Exam Study
  • US Politics
    US Politics
  • E-commerce Guide
    E-commerce Guide
  • Dropshipping Guide
    Dropshipping Guide
  • Microsoft Exam
    Microsoft Exam
  • IT Career News
    IT Career News

Article Tools/Herramientas de artículos

+ Larger Font/Fuente más grande | - Smaller Font/Fuente más pequeña




Consumer Daily Reports

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

A paywall has risen where there was none before

By James R. Hood of ConsumerAffairs
October 1, 2024

CNN -- which, you might recall, stands for Cable News Network -- has never been something you had to pay for. It was just included in nearly every cable TV lineup.

But now, cable TV is dying and CNN would rather not go along for the ride, so it has been planning for quite some time to erect a paywall on its popular website. Today, the wall popped up and the price of admission is $3.99.

That might sound expensive to you if you grew up watching TV news which was free, if you don't count the commercials. But times have changed. News is expensive to gather, process and present and advertising isn't what it used to be, so that leaves you, Mr./Ms. News Reader.

How low is too low?

On the other hand, if you're a confirmed news junky who frequents news sites on the web, $3.99 is almost insultingly low. Here's some of the competition:

  • The New York Times, $27 per month;
  • The Washington Post, $10;
  • The Wall Street Journal, $42;
  • The LA Times, $17; and
  • The New Yorker, $11.

These prices are for their most popular apps or bundles and don't include any kind of print product.

However, they do include some pretty professional and compelling video, presented by actual reporters on the scene of major events. That can actually be pretty compelling. TV reporters are sometimes admirable but they generally lack the depth of knowledge of their print brethren. Also, the newspaper-based videos omit the horrible chit chat and kerfluffle of most TV broadcasts.

However, if TV is your preference, you can always watch ABC, CBS, NBC and tons of other networks and local stations for nothiing.

So the question is: is CNN so essential that people will pay for it? We'll soon see, although it's likely to be awhile before a final answer emerges.

The paywall, by the way, doesn't kick in for the first few stories you watch each month. How many is a few? CNN isn't saying but you'll know it when it happens. Obviously, there will be some variation while the marketing mavens fine-tune their offerings but, one way or another, watching CNN won't be as free and easy as it has been.

A world of news

CNN's journey is a fascinating story of innovation and impact on the media landscape. Here's a glimpse into its history:

The Birth of 24/7 News (1980s)

  • June 1, 1980: Ted Turner launched Cable News Network (CNN), the world's first 24-hour television news channel. It was a bold move, with many doubting its viability.

  • Early Days: Initially nicknamed the "Chicken Noodle Network" due to its limited resources, CNN struggled to gain credibility against established networks.

  • Key Events: CNN's coverage of the Challenger space shuttle disaster in 1986 and the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989 demonstrated its ability to deliver breaking news as it happened.

Growth and Expansion (1990s)

  • Gulf War Coverage (1991): CNN's live reporting from Baghdad during the Gulf War catapulted it to international prominence and solidified its reputation for on-the-ground coverage.

  • CNN International (1985): Expanding its reach globally, CNN International brought its 24-hour news format to a worldwide audience.

  • New Channels: CNN launched additional channels like Headline News (HLN) in 1982 (originally CNN2) and CNNfn (financial news) in 1995, catering to diverse interests.

Digital Age and Beyond (2000s - Present)

  • Online Presence: CNN.com became a leading source of online news, embracing the digital age.

  • Challenges: The rise of internet-based news sources and social media presented new challenges for CNN and traditional media.

  • Evolving Landscape: CNN has adapted by incorporating digital platforms, expanding its online presence, and offering streaming services like CNNgo.

Impact and Legacy

CNN has significantly impacted how we consume news:

  • 24/7 News Cycle: It pioneered the concept of continuous news coverage, shaping how news is reported and delivered.

  • Global Reach: CNN International brought a global perspective to news reporting, connecting audiences worldwide.

  • Breaking News Coverage: Its ability to deliver immediate news coverage of major events has become a defining characteristic.

Looking Ahead

CNN continues to navigate the evolving media landscape, facing challenges from online news sources and social media. Its ability to adapt and innovate will be crucial in maintaining its position as a leading news organization in the digital age.



Photo Credit: Consumer Affairs News Department Images


Posted: 2024-10-01 21:37:50

Get Full News Story On Consumer Affairs



Listen to this article. Speaker link opens in a new window.
Text To Speech BETA Test Version.



More News From This Category

Consumer News: New study finds that smoking, vaping can increase the risk of type 2 diabetes

Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:07:07 +0000

Those who use both traditional cigarettes and e-cigarettes are at the highest risk

By Kristen Dalli of ConsumerAffairs
September 18, 2025
  • Using e-cigarettes, cigarettes, or both is associated with higher risk for prediabetes and diabetes, with dual use being the riskiest.

  • Risk is especially elevated in people who are overweight or obese, of Black, Hispanic or Asian background, or of lower income.

  • Regular exercise seems to help reduce risk, even among smokers.


Youve likely heard that smoking is bad for your lungs. However, new research suggests it might also be quietly upping your chances of developing metabolic issues like prediabetes and diabetes.

As e-cigarette use grows, especially among younger people, scientists wanted to know: is vaping really a safer alternative or is it hiding other long-term risks?

In an era when e-cigarettes are marketed as a safer alternative to smoking, this suggests they may carry a hidden peril and may be quietly contributing to long-term health problems like prediabetes and diabetes, researcher Sulakshan Neupane said in a news release.

As the use of e-cigarettes rises rapidly, its vital we understand their broader health impacts. This is not just about the lungs anymore but the entire body and metabolic health.

The study

The researchers used data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) a large-scale U.S. survey. They analyzed over 1.2 million responses to compare people who smoke traditional cigarettes, those who vape (i.e. use e-cigarettes), people who do both, and those who do neither. Key outcomes they looked for were diagnoses of prediabetes and diabetes.

They also considered demographic and health-related factors: body mass index (BMI), race/ethnicity, income, and whether respondents had existing health conditions. That allowed them to see not just if risk was higher in general, but how it varied depending on other characteristics.

The results

Heres what the study uncovered:

  • Prediabetes risk:

    • Vaping alone was associated with about a 7% higher risk of prediabetes compared to non-users.

    • Smoking traditional cigarettes raised that to about 15%.

    • Using both cigarettes and e-cigarettes conferred a 28% higher riskthe largest increase seen.

  • Diabetes risk (diagnosed disease, not just risk factors):

    • Smokers had higher odds of having diabetes than non-smokers.

    • Those who both smoked and vaped similarly showed elevated risk (roughly 7-9% more likely) of being diagnosed with diabetes.

  • Other factors that make a difference:

    • Overweight or obesity amplified the risk: people with higher BMI who smoked or vaped fared worse.

    • Race/ethnicity mattered: Black, Hispanic, and Asian individuals using tobacco or vaping had higher rates of prediabetes or diabetes than white respondents in similar situations.

    • Income played a role: lower income categories were tied to greater risk for both conditions.

    • On a positive note, regular exercise appeared to reduce risk for smokersshowing that lifestyle can still make a difference.

These findings have important implications for public health efforts to curb smoking and improve diabetes outcomes, Neupane said in the news release."


Read More ...


Consumer News: FTC, states sue Ticketmaster and Live Nation over ticketing abuses

Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:07:07 +0000

Deceptive pricing, fake purchase limits, hidden fees alleged

By Truman Lewis of ConsumerAffairs
September 18, 2025

  • FTC and seven states allege Ticketmaster conspired with brokers to inflate ticket prices.

  • Lawsuit claims deceptive pricing, fake purchase limits, and billions in hidden fees.

  • Trump administration calls the action a monumental step toward protecting fans.


The Federal Trade Commission and seven states filed a sweeping lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment and its Ticketmaster subsidiary, accusing the companies of coordinating with ticket brokers to illegally drive up the cost of live event tickets.

According to the complaint, Ticketmaster allowed brokers to harvest millions of dollars worth of tickets from the primary market, then profited when those tickets were resold on its own platform at inflated prices. The practice, regulators say, forced consumers to pay substantially more than face value for concerts, sports, and other events.

FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson said the lawsuit follows President Donald Trumps March executive order directing federal agencies to protect consumers from ticketing abuses. American live entertainment is the best in the world and should be accessible to all of us, Ferguson said. It should not cost an arm and a leg to take the family to a baseball game or attend your favorite musicians show.

Alleged deceptive practices

The FTC complaint outlines a series of alleged violations, including:

  • Bait-and-switch pricing: Ticketmaster advertised artificially low ticket prices that excluded mandatory feessometimes totaling 44% of the base pricethat were added only at checkout. Regulators say the company collected $16.4 billion in such fees from 2019 through 2024.

  • Fake purchase limits: Although Ticketmaster claimed to impose strict limits on how many tickets consumers could buy, brokers allegedly bypassed those rules using thousands of fake accounts and proxy servers. Internal reviews showed just five brokers controlling more than 246,000 tickets across nearly 2,600 events.

  • Collusion with brokers: Ticketmaster allegedly turned a blind eye to abuses because inflated resale prices boosted its profits. The company even provided brokers with tools like its TradeDesk software to help manage mass ticket resales.

The FTC also cited internal company documents showing Ticketmaster declined to implement stronger anti-fraud measuressuch as third-party ID verificationbecause such steps would reduce revenue.

Market Dominance

Ticketmaster controls as much as 80% of ticketing at major U.S. concert venues and has steadily expanded into the resale market. Between 2019 and 2024, consumers spent more than $82.6 billion buying tickets through the company.

Publicly, Ticketmaster has claimed to oppose broker practices that undermine ordinary fans. But in private, regulators say, executives admitted the company benefited from brokers ability to manipulate ticket availability and pricing.

The lawsuit accuses Ticketmaster and Live Nation of violating the FTC Act and the Better Online Ticket Sales Act. Regulators are seeking civil penalties and additional monetary relief. If successful, the case could reshape how tickets are sold for concerts, sporting events, and other live entertainment in the U.S.


Read More ...


Consumer News: ChatGPT may alert authorities when it detects suicidal thoughts in minors

Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:07:07 +0000

Lawsuit and governmental pressure are driving the changes

By James R. Hood of ConsumerAffairs
September 18, 2025

OpenAI has been working on updated policies to protect young ChatGPT users when suicide is being discussed. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said it "may be reasonable" for the company to notify authorities when minors express thoughts about suicide and parents can't be reached. The changes follow growing pressure from Congress and federal agencies and a lawsuit by the parents of an adolescent who killed himself.

OpenAI said in a memo forwarded to ConsumerAffairs that it isrolling out parental controls intended to link minors accounts to their parents, allow parents to receive distress alerts, manage usage times, and disable certain features. Those tools are expected by end of September and is alsodeveloping anageprediction system: If a user is identified (or estimated) to be under 18, the system will give them an ageappropriate version of ChatGPT. This version will restrict graphic sexual content, avoid flirting, and limit discussion of suicide or selfharm.

OpenAI acknowledges that its current safety guardrails do not always hold up inlonger or more emotionally intense conversations; safety mechanisms may degrade over time or with extended usermodel backandforth.

If you need help ...


U.S.: Call or text the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988, or chat at988lifeline.org

UK & Ireland: Samaritans, 116 123 (freephone), jo@samaritans.org / jo@samaritans.ie

Australia: Lifeline, 13 11 14

Elsewhere: Visitbefrienders.orgfor international hotlines

Pressure for action mounts

The company's move come as governments step up pressure. The Senate is holding a hearing with parents of teens who died or were harmed after interacting with chatbots and the Federal Trade Commission hasbegun an inquiry into AI chatbots (including OpenAI) about harms to children and how safety is tested and overseen. At the state level, agroup of Attorneys General has formally warned OpenAI, saying existing safeguards have failed in some cases, and demanding stronger protections.

Raine lawsuit

Driving the intensifying pressure is the case of Adam Raine, 16. A lawsuit filed by his parents alleges thatChatGPT cultivated a relationship with the teenager, provided instructions for selfharm, discouraged him from seeking external help, and failed to stop potentially harmful content in long conversations. The lawsuit seeks not only damages but regulatory changes: e.g. improved ageverification, blocking selfharm content, psychological warnings, etc.


Read More ...


Consumer News: High-fat diets may rapidly alter memory, study finds

Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:07:06 +0000

Researchers discovered that a few days of eating high-fat junk can disrupt brain cells involved in memory

By Kristen Dalli of ConsumerAffairs
September 18, 2025
  • A high-fat diet, similar to typical saturated fatrich junk food, causes certain brain cells in the hippocampusto become overly active after only a few days.

  • This overactivity stems from reduced glucose (sugar) availability in the brain, and is linked with impaired memory performance.

  • Interventions like restoring glucose levels or dietary changes (for example, intermittent fasting) were shown in mice to reverse these negative effects and improve memory.


We all know diet matters for physical health, but a new study shows the impact of junk food may catch up with your brain surprisingly fast.

Research from UNC School of Medicine, published recently in Neuron, reveals that eating foods high in saturated fat (think fries, cheeseburgers) can alter memory circuitry very quickly even before things like weight gain or diabetes set in.

The investigation zeroes in on the brains hippocampus, the area responsible for many aspects of memory, and describes how specific brain cells respond when the diet is poor.

We knew that diet and metabolism could affect brain health, but we didnt expect to find such a specific and vulnerable group of brain cells, CCK interneurons in the hippocampus, that were directly disrupted by short-term high-fat diet exposure, researcher Juan Song, PhD, said in a news release.

What surprised us most was how quickly these cells changed their activity in response to reduced glucose availability, and how this shift alone was enough to impair memory.

The study

The scientists used mice as their model. They fed some of these mice whats called a high-fat diet (HFD) meant to mimic the saturated-fat heavy junk food many people eat.

They then tracked what happened in the hippocampus, especially focusing on a type of neuron called a CCK (cholecystokinin) interneuron. These neurons are important for shaping how memories are formed and maintained. They also monitored how the brain was using glucose basically, how well brain cells were getting fuel.

Behavioral tests were conducted to see how well mice remembered things after being on the high-fat diet. The researchers also manipulated glucose levels and tried dietary-change interventions (including periods of fasting) to see if the impairments could be reversed.

The study design allowed comparison among mice that stayed on the high-fat diet, those whose glucose was restored, and those who underwent diet modifications.

The results

Within just four days on the high-fat diet, the CCK interneurons in the hippocampus showed abnormally high levels of activity a sign things are going off-balance.

This overactivity seemed connected to lower glucose availability in the brain, meaning the brain wasnt getting enough fuel. As a result, memory performance worsened in the mice, even though other markers of illness (like weight gain or diabetes) werent yet evident.

Encouragingly, the researchers found that restoring glucose availability could calm down those overactive neurons and improve memory. Also, dietary strategies (for example, introducing intermittent fasting after the high-fat diet) helped to normalize neuron activity and rescued memory performance in the animals.

The power of early intervention

The take-away?

It appears that the brains memory circuits are more sensitive to diet than many people assume and even shortterm indulgence in high-fat junk food can trigger measurable changes. But, on the positive side, early interventions might reverse or prevent harm before it becomes.

This work highlights how what we eat can rapidly affect brain health and how early interventions, whether through fasting or medicine, could protect memory and lower the risk of long-term cognitive problems linked to obesity and metabolic disorders, Dr. Song said.

In the long run, such strategies could help reduce the growing burden of dementia and Alzheimers linked to metabolic disorders, offering more holistic care that addresses both body and brain.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Hitting age 100 might not be the norm anymore

Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:07:06 +0000

Researchers identified slower gains in longevity, especially in young ages

By Kristen Dalli of ConsumerAffairs
September 18, 2025

  • Life expectancy increases in many high-income countries are decelerating: the rapid gains seen earlier in the 20th century are tapering off.

  • A big part of this slowdown comes from diminishing improvements in child and infant mortality once a major driver of longer lives.

  • According to the forecasts, no cohort born after 1939 is projected to reach an average lifespan of 100 years.


For decades, many of us have assumed that each successive generation will live longer than the last and maybe even average 100 years someday.

But recent research suggests we might be approaching the limits of how much life expectancy can keep increasing, at least under current conditions.

A new study, drawing on data from multiple high-income countries, shows that improvements in longevity are not just slowing; they may be slowing permanently, especially for people born in more recent decades. If you were born after 1939, the odds are you wont live to see your 100th year on average.

The unprecedented increase in life expectancy we achieved in the first half of the 20th century appears to be a phenomenon we are unlikely to achieve again in the foreseeable future, researcher Pifarr i Arolas said in a news release.

In the absence of any major breakthroughs that significantly extend human life, life expectancy would still not match the rapid increases seen in the early 20th century even if adult survival improved twice as fast as we predict.

The study

The research looked at cohort life expectancy among individuals born between 1939 and 2000 in 23 high-income, low-mortality countries.

Cohort life expectancy accounts for the actual mortality experience of a generation across its life span. Period life expectancy, on the other hand, estimates how long someone would live if current death rates at each age stayed the same.

The researchers used six different forecasting methods to predict future mortality and importantly, they performed robustness checks to make sure their findings were not due to odd data quirks or biases. They also decomposed age-specific trends to see which age groups drove the slowdown.

The results

Heres a look at how the results broke down:

  • Slower increases in life expectancy. Historically, cohorts born early in the 20th century saw life expectancy rise by about 0.46 years per generation (thats about 56 months). But for those born later (19392000), that gain has dropped by 37% to 52%, depending on the forecast method.

  • Young-age mortality improvements taper off. Over half of the slowdown in gains comes from weak or diminishing gains in mortality under age 5; more than two-thirds come from under age 20. In other words, early childhood mortality was once a major lever for increasing life expectancy and that lever has already been heavily pulled.

  • Universal 100-year lifespans are unlikely for newer generations. Based on these forecasts, the researchers conclude that none of the cohorts born after 1939 are expected to reach an average life expectancy of 100. Even people born around 1980 are predicted to fall short.

  • Why this matters. These findings suggest that unless something major changes new medical breakthroughs, better public health in older ages, etc. we shouldnt expect life expectancy to keep shooting up as fast as it once did. For people planning for retirement, health systems preparing for ageing populations, or governments budgeting for pensions, this shift could have real implications.


Read More ...


Related Bing News Results

Consumer Reports Urges Microsoft to Extend Support for Windows 10

Wed, 17 Sep 2025 09:04:00 GMT
The renowned nonprofit product-testing organization Consumer Reports is urging Microsoft to extend support for Windows 10.

Consumer Spending Update: Economic Confidence Down Again in September

Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:24:00 GMT
Economic confidence decreased to 109.4 in this month’s Rasmussen Reports Economic Index, more than two points lower than August.

Consumer Reports: Does Lunchly make a healthy lunch kit?

Mon, 25 Aug 2025 07:58:00 GMT
Move over Lunchables–A competitor called Lunchly advertises a healthier spin on your kid’s favorite lunch kit—with bold claims, influencer hype, and flashy packaging. But how healthy are Lunchly ...

Consumer Reports shares tips to keep your digital wallet safe from hackers and scams

Wed, 20 Aug 2025 20:17:00 GMT
A DIGITAL WALLET. DIGITAL WALLETS ARE FAST, CONVENIENT, AND INCREASINGLY COMMON. I CAN JUST TAKE IT ANYWHERE. WHETHER IT’S ON MY PHONE OR ON MY WATCH, I KNOW THAT I ALWAYS HAVE SOMETHING TO PAY WITH.

Consumer Reports warns of rising digital wallet scams

Mon, 18 Aug 2025 22:43:00 GMT
From groceries to gas, more people are tapping their phones instead of swiping cards to pay. But what happens if that phone goes missing or falls into the wrong hands? Consumer Reports tells you how ...


Blow Us A Whistle




Related Product Search/Búsqueda de productos relacionados