Flying The Web For News.
  • Career Exam Study
    Career Exam Study
  • US Politics
    US Politics
  • E-commerce Guide
    E-commerce Guide
  • Dropshipping Guide
    Dropshipping Guide
  • Microsoft Exam
    Microsoft Exam
  • IT Career News
    IT Career News

Article Tools/Herramientas de artículos

+ Larger Font/Fuente más grande | - Smaller Font/Fuente más pequeña




Consumer Daily Reports

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

It wasn't much discussed in the recent election but may be simmering beneath the surface

By James R. Hood of ConsumerAffairs
November 11, 2024

Candidates in the recent Presidential election spent a lot of time talking about taxes but most of the talk was about income tax -- on the one hand, taxing billionaires and on the other, cutting taxes on tips, overtime and other relatively small change.

There was also a lot of talk about housing, primarily the lack of affordable housing. But,there was very little hot air about property taxes, which are both a cause of high housing costs and the result of them -- and also an annoyance that lurks just beneathmost taxpayers' consciousness.

President-Elect Trump didpledge to restore federal income tax deductability for state and local taxes, including property tax. Kamala Harris said she would giveeligible first-time home buyers a tax credit of up to $10,000. But that was about it.

Of course, property taxes are controlled at the local level so perhaps the Presidential contenders felt it wasn't their problem. Yet, jurisdictional questions aside, Americans are feeling very prickly about the cost of living and the taxesthey pay on their home.

"I always vote against every incumbent in Virginia," snapped a D.C.-area homeowner who was asked about his feelings on election day. "The only people who can afford to live here are federal bureaucrats and generals."

Similar feelings exist not only in the shadow of the White House but just about everywhere, in red and blue states alike, and especially in areas that are experiencing rapid increases in property values. When a "starter home" costs $1 million, it will carry a hefty property tax bill, something homebuyers sometimes gloss over to their subsequent regret.

Polls document a growing surliness on the subject.

  • A January 2024 UChicago Harris/AP-NORC poll revealed that approximately 69% of U.S. adults believe their property tax rates are too high, with only 27% considering them fair.
  • In Texas, a February 2023 University of Texas/Texas Politics Project poll found that 47% of respondents identified property taxes as having the largest impact on their personal finances, surpassing other state taxes.

It's not that consumers are just discovering the property tax. Rather, they have been hit with fast-rising taxes based on skyrocketing property valuations, which are meaningless to homeowners who don't plan to sell.

  • Property values have skyrocketed in recent years, rising almost 27 percent faster thaninflationsince 2020, which yields dramatically higher property taxes in jurisdictions that fail to adjust millages (rates) downward, according to the Tax Foundation.

Instead of shouting slogans or makingoutlandish promises, let's take a sober look at what goes into rising property taxes.

The Economics

Economics is seen as a boring subject but it packs a powerful punch when examining what's behind rising property taxes. Basically, it comes down to:

Rising property values

In recent years, housing prices have soared in many parts of the country, especially in urban and suburban areas. As property values increase, so do property assessments, leading to higher tax bills for homeowners.

  • Even in places where housing markets are cooling or stabilizing, assessed values may lag, leaving homeowners with tax bills based on peak prices that no longer apply.

Inflation

Inflation has driven up the cost of basic goods and services, leaving many people feeling financially squeezed. In this environment, rising property taxes can become an additional burden that many homeowners can't afford.

  • Many retirees and older homeowners on fixed incomes struggle with escalating property taxes as their incomes remain steady or grow only modestly. This can lead to situations where long-time homeowners, especially in gentrifying areas, face the possibility of being priced out of their own homes due to tax increases.
  • This also applies to people of all age groups who are disabled or relying on fixed-rate payments of one sort of another.

Housing affordability

High property taxes contribute to the overall affordability crisis, as both homeowners and renters are affected (landlords usuallypass tax increases onto tenants).

  • This is especially challenging in areas where affordable housing is scarce.

The Reponse

Consumers encounter food and gas prices almost every day so they tend to be quicker to complain about perceived increases, real or not. The same is true of food costs. But once the subject comes up, everyone has an opinion about property taxes and that opinion is nearly always negative.

Nowhere was this more evident than California in the 1970s, when hectic population growth sparked steep increases in property taxes that drove up the cost of housing and threatened to drive retirees and others from their homes.

Passed by California voters in June 1978, the initiative was spearheaded by Howard Jarvis, a taxpayer advocate, and Paul Gann, a political activist.

The people of California have been taxed to the limit, and were fed up. Proposition 13 is the only way to give homeowners and renters the relief they desperately need, Jarvis said. The measure passed handily in 1978, setting off a scramble by state and local governments to fund schools and other essentials from a smaller pot.

California's initiative process is powerful and politicians arewary of angering voters, as seen when then-Gov. Jerry Brown accepted the Prop. 13 it with these words: The people have spoken. The government must now learn to live within the limitations that the taxpayers have set.

Opponents of the measure said it would wreck California and stymie its growth but 40-some years later, California's economy is fifth in the world and it continues to have a thorny housing crisis.

There's little doubt voters in other states would like to do something similar, but few states allow voters as much power to take the reins as California. But there's also little doubt voters elsewhere are fed up with what many see as unfair and unnecessarily harsh property taxes.

This is evidentin places like North Dakota(where a proposal to repeal the property tax made the ballot),Nebraska(where a repeal measure missed the ballot but the taxs evisceration was debated in special session), andWyoming(where the legislature passed a virtual elimination of the tax on residences, but drew a gubernatorial veto), and elsewhere, according to the Tax Foundation, an independent research organization.

  • In some communities, lawsuits are being filed to contest assessments or challenge tax increases, claiming theyre unfairly burdensome or improperly calculated.
  • Organized protests or public campaigns are also emerging, where residents demand reforms to make property taxes more predictable and manageable.

Rural vs. urban

In rural areas, residents often feel that property taxes are disproportionately high relative to the services they receive, especially as compared to urban areas.

In some states, taxpayers in weathier areas resent what they see as a free (or at least cheaper) ride being enjoyed in rural areas, where a similar house carries a much lower tax bill than one in a more affluence suburban area. This can intensify regional tensions over tax allocation and may lead to political pressure for property tax reforms.

Growing dissatisfaction with public spending

Some property owners feel that increased taxes are not matched byimprovements in local services or schools. Dissatisfaction with government spending transparency or efficiency fuels resentment, as taxpayers feel they are paying more without seeing benefits.

Legal challenges

In some communities, lawsuits are being filed to contest assessments or challenge tax increases, claiming theyre unfairly burdensome or improperly calculated.

Organized protests or public campaigns are also emerging, where residents demand reforms to make property taxes more predictable and manageable.

  • In some areas, homeowners are organizing to challenge property tax assessments, pushing for legislation to cap increases or allow for certain exemptions.

Homestead exemptions

Some states have responded by implementing or expanding homestead exemptions, which offer tax relief to primary residents, or tax-freeze initiatives for older adults or low-income homeowners. As taxes continue to rise, there is increased pressure to expand these relief programs.

Shift in public opinion

More people are beginning to view property tax reform as a key issue, and in some places, local and state candidates are running on platforms to cap or reform property taxes. This could signal a shift toward policies that limit annual increases or revise assessment methods.

If this dissatisfaction continues to grow, legislatures could be forced to act. However, reducing property taxes is challenging, as they are a primary revenue source for funding local services like schools, law enforcement, and infrastructure and politicians don't like to take the blame for cutbacks to essential services. That's where an initiative process like California's can get action without elected leaders sticking their necks out.

Balancing these competing interests isn't easy and won't happen without straight talk and action by elected officials and candidates. Talking about onetime tax credits or tax-free tips may get a round of applause but doesn't do anything to begin defining and implementing a solution to a problem everyone wants to solve.



Photo Credit: Consumer Affairs News Department Images


Posted: 2024-11-11 00:31:20

Get Full News Story On Consumer Affairs



Listen to this article. Speaker link opens in a new window.
Text To Speech BETA Test Version.



More News From This Category

Consumer News: Mortgage rates continue to fall, improving affordability

Fri, 19 Sep 2025 13:07:08 +0000

The decline is prompting many homeowners to refinance current mortgages

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs
September 19, 2025
  • Mortgage rates drop to 6.26%, boosting affordability.

  • Refinancing surges, now nearly 60% of mortgage applications.

  • Fed cut expectations, weak job market drive rate declines.


Home affordability improved again this week. Freddie Mac reports its Primary Mortgage Market Survey shows the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 6.26% this week.

Mortgage rates decreased yet again this week, prompting many homeowners to refinance. In fact, the share of mortgage applications that were refinances reached nearly 60%, the highest since January 2022, said Sam Khater, Freddie Macs chief economist.

In fact, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported that mortgage applications increased 29.7% last week from one week earlier. Most of those were applications to refinance existing mortgages.

The Refinance Index increased 58% from the previous week and was 70% higher than the same week one year ago. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 3% from one week earlier.

Indicative of the weakening job market, and in anticipation of a rate cut from the Federal Reserve, mortgage rates last week dropped to their lowest level since last October, with the 30-year fixed rate declining to 6.39%, said Mike Fratantoni, MBAs chief economist.

Homeowners responded swiftly, with refinance application volume jumping almost 60% compared to the prior week.

Fratantoni said homeowners with larger loans jumped first, as the average loan size on refinances reached its highest level in the 35-year history of our survey.

Latest rates

The 30-year FRM averaged 6.26% as of September 18, 2025, down from last week when it averaged 6.35%. A year ago at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 6.09%.

The 15-year FRM averaged 5.41%, down from last week when it averaged 5.50%. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 5.15%.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Safety Recall Roundup, Sept. 18

Fri, 19 Sep 2025 04:07:07 +0000

Battery hazards, children's products, fire risks all in today's Recall Roundup

By News Desk of ConsumerAffairs
September 18, 2025

This weeks recalls highlight serious lithium-ion battery hazards (power banks, vaporizers, fans), childrens product safety failures (dressers, baby loungers, helmets, crib mobiles), and fire risks in household products (cotton candy makers, fire pits). Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately and follow manufacturer instructions for refunds, replacements, or safe disposal.

Anker Power Banks

  • Photo

    Hazard: Lithium-ion batteries can overheat, posing fire and burn hazards.

  • Units Affected: ~2,100

  • Remedy: Replace

  • Incidents: 28 overheating/exploding reports; 2 burn injuries.

  • Sold At: Best Buy, Target, Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Walmart (JanJul 2024, $40$60).

  • Details: Models A1642 (12W), A1647 (15W), A1652 (20W).

  • Action: Stop use immediately. Contact Anker Recalls for replacement. Dispose of recalled batteries at a local recycling/hazardous waste facility.

  • Recall No.: 25-011


EnHomee 13-Drawer Dressers

  • Photo

    Hazard: Unstable if not anchored, violating STURDY Act. Risk of tip-over, entrapment, serious injury or death to children.

  • Units Affected: ~11,200

  • Remedy: Refund

  • Incidents: None reported.

  • Sold At: Amazon, Walmart, Wayfair, Shein, TikTok, Shopify, Temu (Sep 2023Mar 2025, $75$120).

  • Details: Fabric dressers, 55"W x 35"H x 11"D, in rustic brown, white, black, pink.

  • Action: Stop use if unanchored. Contact EnHomee for disposal and refund (photo required).

  • Recall No.: 25-474


LXDHSTRA Baby Loungers

  • Photo

    Hazard: Multiple safety violationstoo-low sides, too-thick pad, entrapment/fall risk. Includes banned crib bumpers under the Safe Sleep for Babies Act.

  • Units Affected: ~360

  • Remedy: Refund

  • Incidents: None reported.

  • Sold At: Amazon (MayAug 2025, $30$34).

  • Action: Stop use immediately. Destroy loungers and bumpers (cut in half) and send photos to lxdhstrarecall@gmail.com for refund.

  • Recall No.: 25-473


YooxArmor Multi-Purpose Kids Helmets

  • Photo

    Hazard: Fail to meet federal helmet safety standards; risk of head injury or death.

  • Units Affected: ~1,780

  • Remedy: Refund

  • Incidents: None reported.

  • Sold At: Amazon (Oct 2024Jul 2025, ~$30).

  • Details: Pink helmets, unicorn/rainbow/star print, size small, with black straps and red buckle.

  • Action: Stop use, cut straps, and send photo to service@yooxarmor.com for refund.


Youbeien Crib Mobiles

  • Photo

    Hazard: Remotes button-battery compartment is unsecured. Ingested batteries can cause burns or death.

  • Units Affected: ~3,000

  • Remedy: Refund

  • Incidents: None reported.

  • Sold At: Amazon (May 2024Apr 2025, ~$20).

  • Action: Stop use. Dispose of product (or remote only for partial refund). Send proof photo to gkkbsjtoys@outlook.com.

  • Recall No.: 25-471


Arizer Solo II Vaporizers

  • Photo

    Hazard: Lithium-ion battery can overheat, smoke, or eject material. Fire/burn risk.

  • Units Affected: ~5,460 (plus ~2,820 in Canada).

  • Remedy: Replace

  • Incidents: 9 overheating/smoking reports; no injuries.

  • Sold At: Specialty shops, arizer.com (Jun 2024Jul 2025, ~$170).

  • Action: Stop use. Contact Arizer for replacement Solo II MAX. Dispose at hazardous waste facilities per local rules.

  • Recall No.: 25-470


Ambiano Cotton Candy Makers

  • Photo

    Hazard: Heating element may ignite sugar if used without receptacle, fire hazard.

  • Units Affected: ~21,690

  • Remedy: Refund

  • Incidents: 12 reports of sparking/fire; no injuries.

  • Sold At: ALDI stores (AugSep 2024, $15).

  • Action: Stop use. Return to ALDI or send cut-cord photo for refund.

  • Recall No.: 25-469


IcyBreeze Buddy Portable Misting Fans

  • Photo

    Hazard: Overheats while charging, may ignite.

  • Units Affected: ~22,600

  • Remedy: Refund ($150 Solo Brands credit)

  • Incidents: 7 overheating reports; 2 fires; no injuries.

  • Sold At: Icybreeze.com, Amazon (Nov 2023Aug 2024, ~$150).

  • Action: Stop use. Submit photo of cut power cord at recall site for refund credit. Dispose per hazardous waste rules.

  • Recall No.: 25-468


Five Below Tabletop Fire Pits

  • Photo

    Hazard: Alcohol fuel may splash/leak, causing flash fires, flame jetting, burn hazards.

  • Units Affected: ~66,000

  • Remedy: Refund ($5 or purchase price).

  • Incidents: 1 report of flames escaping; no injuries.

  • Sold At: Five Below (Apr 2024Aug 2025, $2.50$5).

  • Action: Stop use. Return to Five Below or submit proof photo for refund.

  • Recall No.: 25-467


Read More ...


Consumer News: New study finds that smoking, vaping can increase the risk of type 2 diabetes

Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:07:07 +0000

Those who use both traditional cigarettes and e-cigarettes are at the highest risk

By Kristen Dalli of ConsumerAffairs
September 18, 2025
  • Using e-cigarettes, cigarettes, or both is associated with higher risk for prediabetes and diabetes, with dual use being the riskiest.

  • Risk is especially elevated in people who are overweight or obese, of Black, Hispanic or Asian background, or of lower income.

  • Regular exercise seems to help reduce risk, even among smokers.


Youve likely heard that smoking is bad for your lungs. However, new research suggests it might also be quietly upping your chances of developing metabolic issues like prediabetes and diabetes.

As e-cigarette use grows, especially among younger people, scientists wanted to know: is vaping really a safer alternative or is it hiding other long-term risks?

In an era when e-cigarettes are marketed as a safer alternative to smoking, this suggests they may carry a hidden peril and may be quietly contributing to long-term health problems like prediabetes and diabetes, researcher Sulakshan Neupane said in a news release.

As the use of e-cigarettes rises rapidly, its vital we understand their broader health impacts. This is not just about the lungs anymore but the entire body and metabolic health.

The study

The researchers used data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) a large-scale U.S. survey. They analyzed over 1.2 million responses to compare people who smoke traditional cigarettes, those who vape (i.e. use e-cigarettes), people who do both, and those who do neither. Key outcomes they looked for were diagnoses of prediabetes and diabetes.

They also considered demographic and health-related factors: body mass index (BMI), race/ethnicity, income, and whether respondents had existing health conditions. That allowed them to see not just if risk was higher in general, but how it varied depending on other characteristics.

The results

Heres what the study uncovered:

  • Prediabetes risk:

    • Vaping alone was associated with about a 7% higher risk of prediabetes compared to non-users.

    • Smoking traditional cigarettes raised that to about 15%.

    • Using both cigarettes and e-cigarettes conferred a 28% higher riskthe largest increase seen.

  • Diabetes risk (diagnosed disease, not just risk factors):

    • Smokers had higher odds of having diabetes than non-smokers.

    • Those who both smoked and vaped similarly showed elevated risk (roughly 7-9% more likely) of being diagnosed with diabetes.

  • Other factors that make a difference:

    • Overweight or obesity amplified the risk: people with higher BMI who smoked or vaped fared worse.

    • Race/ethnicity mattered: Black, Hispanic, and Asian individuals using tobacco or vaping had higher rates of prediabetes or diabetes than white respondents in similar situations.

    • Income played a role: lower income categories were tied to greater risk for both conditions.

    • On a positive note, regular exercise appeared to reduce risk for smokersshowing that lifestyle can still make a difference.

These findings have important implications for public health efforts to curb smoking and improve diabetes outcomes, Neupane said in the news release."


Read More ...


Consumer News: FTC, states sue Ticketmaster and Live Nation over ticketing abuses

Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:07:07 +0000

Deceptive pricing, fake purchase limits, hidden fees alleged

By Truman Lewis of ConsumerAffairs
September 18, 2025

  • FTC and seven states allege Ticketmaster conspired with brokers to inflate ticket prices.

  • Lawsuit claims deceptive pricing, fake purchase limits, and billions in hidden fees.

  • Trump administration calls the action a monumental step toward protecting fans.


The Federal Trade Commission and seven states filed a sweeping lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment and its Ticketmaster subsidiary, accusing the companies of coordinating with ticket brokers to illegally drive up the cost of live event tickets.

According to the complaint, Ticketmaster allowed brokers to harvest millions of dollars worth of tickets from the primary market, then profited when those tickets were resold on its own platform at inflated prices. The practice, regulators say, forced consumers to pay substantially more than face value for concerts, sports, and other events.

FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson said the lawsuit follows President Donald Trumps March executive order directing federal agencies to protect consumers from ticketing abuses. American live entertainment is the best in the world and should be accessible to all of us, Ferguson said. It should not cost an arm and a leg to take the family to a baseball game or attend your favorite musicians show.

Alleged deceptive practices

The FTC complaint outlines a series of alleged violations, including:

  • Bait-and-switch pricing: Ticketmaster advertised artificially low ticket prices that excluded mandatory feessometimes totaling 44% of the base pricethat were added only at checkout. Regulators say the company collected $16.4 billion in such fees from 2019 through 2024.

  • Fake purchase limits: Although Ticketmaster claimed to impose strict limits on how many tickets consumers could buy, brokers allegedly bypassed those rules using thousands of fake accounts and proxy servers. Internal reviews showed just five brokers controlling more than 246,000 tickets across nearly 2,600 events.

  • Collusion with brokers: Ticketmaster allegedly turned a blind eye to abuses because inflated resale prices boosted its profits. The company even provided brokers with tools like its TradeDesk software to help manage mass ticket resales.

The FTC also cited internal company documents showing Ticketmaster declined to implement stronger anti-fraud measuressuch as third-party ID verificationbecause such steps would reduce revenue.

Market Dominance

Ticketmaster controls as much as 80% of ticketing at major U.S. concert venues and has steadily expanded into the resale market. Between 2019 and 2024, consumers spent more than $82.6 billion buying tickets through the company.

Publicly, Ticketmaster has claimed to oppose broker practices that undermine ordinary fans. But in private, regulators say, executives admitted the company benefited from brokers ability to manipulate ticket availability and pricing.

The lawsuit accuses Ticketmaster and Live Nation of violating the FTC Act and the Better Online Ticket Sales Act. Regulators are seeking civil penalties and additional monetary relief. If successful, the case could reshape how tickets are sold for concerts, sporting events, and other live entertainment in the U.S.


Read More ...


Consumer News: ChatGPT may alert authorities when it detects suicidal thoughts in minors

Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:07:07 +0000

Lawsuit and governmental pressure are driving the changes

By James R. Hood of ConsumerAffairs
September 18, 2025

OpenAI has been working on updated policies to protect young ChatGPT users when suicide is being discussed. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said it "may be reasonable" for the company to notify authorities when minors express thoughts about suicide and parents can't be reached. The changes follow growing pressure from Congress and federal agencies and a lawsuit by the parents of an adolescent who killed himself.

OpenAI said in a memo forwarded to ConsumerAffairs that it isrolling out parental controls intended to link minors accounts to their parents, allow parents to receive distress alerts, manage usage times, and disable certain features. Those tools are expected by end of September and is alsodeveloping anageprediction system: If a user is identified (or estimated) to be under 18, the system will give them an ageappropriate version of ChatGPT. This version will restrict graphic sexual content, avoid flirting, and limit discussion of suicide or selfharm.

OpenAI acknowledges that its current safety guardrails do not always hold up inlonger or more emotionally intense conversations; safety mechanisms may degrade over time or with extended usermodel backandforth.

If you need help ...


U.S.: Call or text the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988, or chat at988lifeline.org

UK & Ireland: Samaritans, 116 123 (freephone), jo@samaritans.org / jo@samaritans.ie

Australia: Lifeline, 13 11 14

Elsewhere: Visitbefrienders.orgfor international hotlines

Pressure for action mounts

The company's move come as governments step up pressure. The Senate is holding a hearing with parents of teens who died or were harmed after interacting with chatbots and the Federal Trade Commission hasbegun an inquiry into AI chatbots (including OpenAI) about harms to children and how safety is tested and overseen. At the state level, agroup of Attorneys General has formally warned OpenAI, saying existing safeguards have failed in some cases, and demanding stronger protections.

Raine lawsuit

Driving the intensifying pressure is the case of Adam Raine, 16. A lawsuit filed by his parents alleges thatChatGPT cultivated a relationship with the teenager, provided instructions for selfharm, discouraged him from seeking external help, and failed to stop potentially harmful content in long conversations. The lawsuit seeks not only damages but regulatory changes: e.g. improved ageverification, blocking selfharm content, psychological warnings, etc.


Read More ...


Related Bing News Results

Consumer Spending Update: Economic Confidence Down Again in September

Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:24:00 GMT
Economic confidence decreased to 109.4 in this month’s Rasmussen Reports Economic Index, more than two points lower than August.

The best used cars to buy now according to Consumer Reports

Sat, 23 Aug 2025 07:11:00 GMT
Between inflation and tariffs, buying a new car is further out of reach than ever before for the average working-class consumer. As of the most recent census, the median individual income in the ...

Consumer Reports: Stricter testing to be required for child car seats

Fri, 08 Aug 2025 15:55:00 GMT
Tougher safety rules are on the way for car seats, focusing on dangerous side-impact crashes. Car seat manufacturers have made claims about side-impact protection, but there’s been no industry ...

5 affordable new cars that Consumer Reports recommends

Wed, 06 Aug 2025 06:24:00 GMT
While inflation rates have fallen substantially from their June 2022 peak of 9.1%, consumer prices are still rising, and the wave of tariffs introduced by the Trump administration in 2025 — ...





Blow Us A Whistle




Related Product Search/Búsqueda de productos relacionados