Flying The Web For News.
  • Career Exam Study
    Career Exam Study
  • US Politics
    US Politics
  • E-commerce Guide
    E-commerce Guide
  • Dropshipping Guide
    Dropshipping Guide
  • Microsoft Exam
    Microsoft Exam
  • IT Career News
    IT Career News

Article Tools/Herramientas de artículos

+ Larger Font/Fuente más grande | - Smaller Font/Fuente más pequeña




Consumer Daily Reports

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

We take a detailed look at the banking options U.S. consumers have

By Steven Melendez of ConsumerAffairs
December 16, 2024

Choosing the right banking option can be complex, with consumers weighing features like fees, accessibilityand digital tools across traditional banks, credit unions, online banksand fintech firms.

Key Insights:

  • Credit unions tend to have the highest customer satisfaction, offering personalized service and fewer fees.

  • Online banks attract consumers with higher interest rates and no fees but lack in-person services.

  • Fintech firms and brokerages provide innovative features but may face challenges with customer support.

  • Brick-and-mortar banks offer convenience for in-person banking but often charge more fees and have lower customer satisfaction.

Many consumers use multiple accounts across different providers to maximize benefits like higher interest rates, better apps, or broader ATM access. As options grow, assessing your banking needssuch as fee tolerance, access to in-person services, and digital toolsis key to finding the best fit.

Nearly 10,000 institutions to choose from

As of June 30, there were 4,539 banks insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, according to FDIC data, including both traditional brick-and-mortar banks and those operating online. That's on top of 4,533 member-owned credit unions covered by insurance from the National Credit Union Administration.

Consumer News: Choosing the best banking option isn’t always easy

And in recent years, Americans have also been able to turn to financial technology, or fintech, firms for accounts that can function a lot like traditional checking accounts, offering at the very least a debit card and the ability to have a paycheck directly deposited. Traditional brokerage firms have also gotten into the act, offering cash management accounts that share many of the features of a checking accountor, in some cases, providing actual accounts from an affiliated bank.

But not all of these accounts are created equal. Even among institutions of the same basic type, accounts can vary in terms of monthly fees and whether in-person banking is easily accessible, whether there's ready access to paper checks, and which ATMs account holders can access without a fee. And whether an institution offers branch banking or is strictly online, there's the question of what online banking features are available and how easy it is to contact customer service operators by phone.

In general, experts generally say, traditional brick-and-mortar banks are less likely to offer fee-free accounts than other types of institutions, in what's essentially a tradeoff for the convenience of in-person banking. Offerings naturally vary from institution to institution, and banks sometimes waive fees for customers with larger balances or regular direct deposits.

On top of those complexities, while accounts at traditional banks and credit unions are typically insured up to $250,000 by the federal government, the insurance situation for accounts at other types of institutions can be more complex. "The short answer is: it depends," the FDIC has cautioned the public.

Surveying the landscape

We set out to take a look at what types of financial institutions seem to have the most satisfied customers, and what different types of institutions might have to offer for different consumers. Our first stop was our own ConsumerAffairs customer ratings and reviews, where our readers have weighed in on their experiences with different banks and other institutions through our online review form.

We filtered for valid reviews of financial institutions that offer a checking account or similar product, submitted between Sept. 1, 2020 and Nov. 14, 2024 regarding companies that had at least 10 valid reviews in that period, and found 10,325 in total. Not all of those reviews necessarily specifically address any particular account type at the institution, but many cover features and experiences relevant to any type of product or account, like issues with customer service.

Of course, people tend to fill out online reviews when they've had a particularly memorable experience, and for financial institutions, that often tends to be a negative one, since routine deposits, withdrawals, and interest payments are often unremarkable. And, indeed, the vast majority of the reviews we looked at were negative: About 92.5% were one-star reviews, on a typical one to five scale, with five being the highest, while other recent industry surveys indicate most people are generally satisfied with their financial institutions. One survey released by the American Bankers Association in October found 85% of Americans with bank accounts are "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their primary bank.

Consumer News: Choosing the best banking option isn’t always easy

But clear distinctions still emerged in the ConsumerAffairs data between different types of financial institutionswhich we divided into credit unions, brick-and-mortar banks, online banks, brokerages, and fintech firmsand those seem to mirror other findings about customer satisfaction with financial services.

Credit unions come out on top

Looking by category, average star rating was highest at credit unions, of which there are two in our review sample: Navy Federal Credit Union and Pentagon Federal Credit Union, also known as PenFed.

Both are among the largest credit unions in the country, and as their names suggest, both have historically catered to people connected with the military and defense operations. PenFed is now open to any U.S. citizen or permanent resident, though Navy Federal remains limited to categories of people including active duty service members and reservists, veterans, civilian Department of Defense employees, and their families.

The two credit unions both received an average star rating of roughly 1.243 during our sample period, and overall 3.47% of credit union reviews were five-star reviews, the highest of any category.

Brokerages

Next in terms of overall star rating were traditional brokerages, of which our sample included two offering checking accounts or something similar: Charles Schwab and Fidelity Investments. Schwab offers checking accounts through the affiliated, FDIC-insured Charles Schwab Bank, while Fidelity offers a cash management account with checking-like features, including a debit card and mobile check deposit.

Both also typically offer reimbursements for ATM fees you may incur if you need to get cash. They collectively saw an average star rating of about 1.204, and about 2.5% of reviewers awarded five stars. Schwab came in the higher rated of the two, with a 1.25 average star rating and 3.57% of its reviews awarding a full five stars.

Online banks

After brokerages came online banks, with an average star rating of about 1.2, and about 3.39% of ratings awarded five stars. There are 10 in our sample, all of them FDIC-insured banks without a traditional network of branches.

The highest average star rating during our sample period for an online bank, about 1.41, belongs to SoFi. It offers a full assortment of financial products, including checking and savings accounts, credit cards, a variety of loans, and investment services.

About 8.97% of its reviews were five-star reviews, with fans praising the ease of setting up and accessing accounts and the lack of fees. A close second in online banking, with an average star rating of 1.375 during the period, and 8.33% five-star reviews, was Varo Bank.

Fintech

Fintech companies saw an average star rating of 1.188 in our sample, and about 3.23% of ratings were five stars. Again, we only looked at companies offering something akin to a checking account and at least 10 valid reviews in our sample period.

The category is a broad one, including businesses offering a wide variety of deposit accounts, investment features, options for depositing cash, loan offerings, and additional features like credit monitoring and money transfer.

Our highest rated institution in this category is Chime, which had an average star rating of about 1.664 and 13.7% five-star reviews.

Brick and mortar

Banks with brick-and-mortar branches came in with an average star rating of about 1.154, the lowest of our categories, and only about 2.18% of ratings were five stars.

Highest rated among them was Armed Forces Bank, which caters especially to military members and their families, though civilians can also open accounts. It had an average star rating of 1.75, with about 16.7% of reviews awarding five stars. USAA Bank, which also caters to military families and generally requires some sort of tie to the armed forces to join, was also relatively well received by our reviewers, with an average star rating of roughly 1.538 and about 7.69% of reviews awarding five stars.

Breaking out the four largest retail banks by assetsWells Fargo, Chase, Citi, and Bank of Americawe saw an average star rating of just 1.138, lower than our average brick-and-mortar bank rating of 1.154. Only about 2% of reviews gave four star reviews. The highest rated of the big four banks was Chase, with an average rating of 1.166 and 2.5% of reviews giving five stars.

So in general, it seems safe to say that our reviewers generally don't see a traditional bank branch network as key to their financial satisfaction, with brokerages, online banks, and fintech companies all being rated higher on average than traditional banks.

That mirrors what some other polls have found: In May 2024, the J.D. Power 2024 U.S. Direct Banking Satisfaction Survey also found online-only banks outperformed traditional banks, though the company noted that satisfaction had declined somewhat from the previous year.

Among checking providers included in the category, J.D. Power's poll ranked Charles Schwab Bank the highest for the sixth year in a row, followed by Capital One, then Ally Bank.

"We do see that in particular the online institutions that are banks do have satisfaction that is quite a bit higher than traditional banks," said Paul McAdam, senior director for banking and payments at J.D. Power, in an interview.

Consumers prefer online banking

Consumers appear to be attracted to online banks by higher interest rates and lower fees, McAdam said, and in some cases by the ease of online banking or particular innovative features in banking apps. Logically enough, affluent customers are likely to be attracted to the ability to earn interest on funds they've saved, and budget-conscious consumers appreciate the lack of fees, McAdam said.

Fintech firms offering bank services, or "neobanks," ranked between online-only banks and traditional banks, he confirmed. Their customers generally report fewer problems overall than traditional banks, but they also tend to find that when they do have problems, it can be harder to reach someone who can actually help, sometimes requiring going through multiple channels including chat sessions and phone calls, McAdam said.

"It's harder to reach phone reps; it's harder to find the 800 number for service," he said. "It's just not as easy to get help with problems."

Traditional banks not abandoned

Studies also suggest that consumers haven't abandoned traditional banks. For one reason, some people still prefer banking in person. A study released in June by Chime and the Financial Technology Association found that while 63% of those surveyed said they found banking apps more convenient than the brick-and-mortar bank, 28% felt just the opposite.

A Consumer Reports poll last year found similar results, with 55% of bank app users saying they felt more comfortable on the app than in a physical bank and 23% saying they felt more comfortable in a bank branch than using an app.

If anything, those numbers may underestimate the appeal of brick-and-mortar banking. Earlier this year, Galileo Financial Technologiesan independently operated company owned by SoFi that builds technology for financial companiesreleased a survey with Datos Insights that found that 38% of those surveyed consider one of those four biggest U.S. banks by assets to be their primary financial services provider.

Another 39% pointed to other types of traditional banks and 14% said they primarily used a credit union, while only 6% said an "online/digital-only bank" was their primary financial institution. Survey results indicated it wasn't just a matter of longtime customers sticking with the institutions they know.

"Surprisingly, 66% of Gen Z primarily bank at a Big 4 or super regional bank, while older millennials and Gen Xers are the biggest users of online banks," according to the study. "The market remains split."

Still, the Galileo/Datos report pointed to a study released last year by Cornerstone Advisors that found almost half of the checking accounts opened in the first half of 2023 were opened with digital banks and fintech firms. It's not a contradictionconsumers are opening multiple accounts for different purposes and to access different services offered by different banks, and deliberately opening backup accounts in case they ever have trouble accessing some of their funds.

Multiple providers becoming the norm

The GalileoConsumerBanking Report reveals that fintechs and neobanks are meeting an unmet demand for new, flexible services that let consumers 'bank' wherever they are, whether online or mobile," said David Albertazzi, director ofDatos Insights'retail banking & payments practice, in an email.

"This shift hasnt led consumers to abandon their primary banks; instead, theyre augmenting their financial toolkit by integrating new services from multiple providers, he said.

That's become increasingly easy with online banks and fintech companies offering free accountsof participants in the Galileo/Datos survey who did close accounts, 27% cited feesand many institutions offering easy-to-use free funds transfers. Savvy consumers can keep a minimum balance or receive their direct deposits at one bank, getting any fees waived, then transfer money to free accounts at online banks or fintech firms offering better interest, better apps, or a broader free ATM network.

"We know that on average a consumer has between two and three deposit accounts," said Jennifer White, senior director for banking and payments at J.D. Power. "So as a result they have experiences with multiple institutions at the same time."

And a March 2024 Consumer Reports study of mobile banking apps also indicated that when it comes to digital banking, it's not simply the case that online-only banks and fintech companies have features that traditional banks don't.

The study found the traditional banks examined typically had more "financial well-being tools and features," such as automatic saving options, budgeting tools, and options to split direct deposits between checking and savings accounts than the online banks and fintech firms examined.

Traditional banks were also more likely to offer websites and apps in Spanish, according to the study. On the other hand, the study confirmed, purely digital institutions were more likely to come without fees and pay more interest on savings accounts.

Consumers may also be wary of putting all of their nest egg in one basket, particularly if their total balances exceed federal deposit insurance limits or they're uncertain about when fintech accounts are covered by the FDIC.

In one recent high-profile case, fintech companies reportedly worked with a third-party firm called Synapse Financial Technologies to place customer funds in FDIC-insured bank accounts, but after Synapse filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April, some customers have found their funds in limbo.

The FDIC has since proposed a rule that would mandate stronger record keeping for such arrangements. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau also warned in June 2023 that funds stored in payment apps like PayPal, Venmo, and Cash Appall of which offer debit cards and other features that let them be used similar to traditional checking accountsmay not be covered by federal deposit insurance, giving consumers something else to consider as they weigh options for managing their funds.

Which is best for you?

There's no one-size-fits-all answer to this question. If it seems like there are a lot of banking options, there are! And most people would say that's a good thing, since a wide range of choices means that each individualcan find a solution that works for their particular situation.

If you're a newcomer to banking, maybe a walk-in bricks-and-mortar branch is best as a "starter" bank, since there are tellers there who can walk you through the process and help with any glitches.

Once you're familiar with how banking works, an online bank offers the convenience of not having to physically go to the bank and, in most cases, will charge fewer fees and pay you higher interest.

Combining the best of walk-in and online, of course, is a credit union. As we found in our study, they tend to have the highest customer satisfaction scores while offering the convenience and cost savings of in-person and online banking.

Fintech -- apps provided by non-bank companies -- is also convenient but probably isn't a substitute for a "regular" bank account. For one thing, fintech accounts may notprovideFDIC insurance and may not offer muchassistance if you run into trouble.

To find the best bank for you, read this article a few times, then check online reviews for the banks that look interesting to you, paying special attention to credit unions. Good hunting!



Photo Credit: Consumer Affairs News Department Images


Posted: 2024-12-16 01:50:49

Get Full News Story On Consumer Affairs



Listen to this article. Speaker link opens in a new window.
Text To Speech BETA Test Version.



More News From This Category

Consumer News: California lawmakers pass PFAS ban, bill heads to governor

Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:07:08 +0000

Dental floss, cookware, cleaning products may be banned

By Truman Lewis of ConsumerAffairs
September 16, 2025

  • California could ban the sale of products with toxic forever chemicals starting in 2028

  • Everyday items like dental floss, cleaning products and cookware would be affected

  • Advocates say the move could set a national standard and reduce exposure to harmful chemicals


California is on the verge of becoming the next state to ban the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often called forever chemicals because they persist in the environment and the human body. Senate Bill 682, authored by Sen. Ben Allen (D-Santa Monica), has cleared the Legislature and now awaits Gov. Gavin Newsoms signature.

If signed into law, the bill would ban the sale and distribution of many consumer goods containing intentionally added PFAS beginning in 2028. Those products include cleaning supplies, dental floss, plastic food packaging and ski wax. A second phase, taking effect in 2030, would prohibit the sale of cookware with intentionally added PFAS.

Health concerns drive legislation

PFAS are widely used in nonstick coatings and water-resistant treatments, but decades of research link them to serious health risks. Studies have found associations with cancer, immune system suppression, developmental harm to fetuses, and reduced vaccine effectiveness.
No one should be exposed to toxic PFAS just from cooking dinner or cleaning their home, said Susan Little, California legislative director for the Environmental Working Group, which cosponsored the bill.

The state has already restricted PFAS in textiles, cosmetics, menstrual products, paper-based food packaging, firefighting foam and certain childrens products. SB 682 would expand those protections, making California one of the strictest states in curbing exposure to PFAS. Other states, including Colorado, Connecticut and Minnesota, have also enacted PFAS bans in specific product categories.

National impact expected

Because California is the worlds fourth-largest economy, its consumer protection laws often shape national markets. Experts say manufacturers may remove PFAS from all their products rather than produce separate lines for California, potentially creating a de facto nationwide standard.

Gov. Newsom has until October 12 to act on SB 682. Supporters hope he will sign it into law, continuing his record of advancing public health measures. If approved, California would take another major step toward reducing exposure to PFAS in everyday consumer products.


What consumers can do now
PFAS are still widespread in many common household items. Until stronger laws take effect, here are ways to limit your exposure:

  • Check cookware labels: Opt for stainless steel, cast iron or ceramic pans instead of nonstick coated cookware.

  • Read product ingredients: Avoid cleaning supplies, cosmetics and dental floss that list fluoro or PTFE in the ingredients.

  • Filter drinking water: Some home water filters are certified to reduce PFAS contamination.

  • Cut down on packaged foods: PFAS can leach from grease-resistant food packaging into food.

  • Stay updated: Follow the EPAs PFAS resources and the FTCs consumer alerts for news on recalls and regulations.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Chegg to refund millions after FTC says it trapped consumers in subscriptions

Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:07:08 +0000

Cancellation form was too hard to find and consumers were ignored when they tried to quit, FTC charges

By James R. Hood of ConsumerAffairs
September 16, 2025

  • FTC says Chegg buried its cancellation process and ignored requests to stop billing

  • Nearly 200,000 consumers were charged after canceling, according to the complaint

  • Settlement provides $7.5 million in refunds and requires easier cancellations


Chegg, a "study solutions" companywill be required to pay $7.5 million to refund customers who were charged for subscriptions even after they tried to cancel. The Federal Trade Commission alleges the education technology company used confusing and unlawful practices that made it nearly impossible for students and parents to stop recurring charges.

According to the FTC, Chegg continued billing nearly 200,000 consumers after cancellation requests since October 2020. The cancellation process was buried on its websites, required multiple clicks to find, and was so cumbersome that many people gave up. Despite consumer complaints and its own awareness that the process was flawed Chegg did not improve access to the cancellation link.

FTC: canceling must be simple

It harms the American people when companies fail to provide simple mechanisms to cancel recurring charges, said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTCs Bureau of Consumer Protection. He said the agency is stepping up enforcement of the Restore Online Shoppers Confidence Act, which requires clear disclosures, informed consent, and straightforward cancellation options.

This is not Cheggs first run-in with the FTC. In 2022, the company agreed to improve data security and purge unnecessary personal information after its weak safeguards exposed sensitive information about millions of consumers and employees.

Refunds and reforms ahead

Under the new proposed order, Chegg must not only provide refunds but also maintain simple, visible cancellation mechanisms across all its subscription services. The settlement was filed in federal court in California following a unanimous 3-0 vote by the Commission.


How to claim a refund

  • The $7.5 million settlement will be distributed to consumers who were improperly charged.

  • Refunds will be handled by the FTC once the court approves the settlement.

  • Consumers do not need to take action yet the FTC will contact eligible individuals directly by email or mail with instructions.

  • Updates will be posted on the FTCs official refund page: ftc.gov/refunds.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Consumers' credit scores have dipped in 2025

Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:07:07 +0000

The decline reflects higher credit card utilization and a rise in missed payments

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs
September 16, 2025
  • FICOs inaugural Credit Insights report shows U.S. credit scores dipping as inflation and student loan payments weigh on consumers.

  • Gen Z faces the steepest declines, with student loan debt driving higher financial volatility.

  • Auto loans now rank above mortgages in repayment priority, underscoring a major shift in consumer payment behavior.


FICO, the analytics software firm behind the widely used FICO Score, has released its first-ever Credit Insights report, offering a detailed look at how consumer credit behavior is evolving amid inflation, resumed student loan payments, and shifting financial priorities.

With 90% of top U.S. lenders relying on FICO Scores, the findings provide a window into how millions of Americans are managing debt in a changing economy.

The national average FICO Score now stands at 715, a two-point dip from 2024. While modest, the decline reflects higher credit card utilization and a rise in missed payments, some tied to the resumption of student loan delinquency reporting.

Consumers are adapting whether by prioritizing essential payments like auto loans, navigating the return of student loan obligations, or actively monitoring their credit health, said Julie May, vice president and general manager of B2B Scores at FICO.

Younger borrowers hit hardest

The report highlights that Gen Z, ages 18 to 29, experienced the sharpest score decline, down three points year-over-year. Younger consumers also had more frequent large swings with scores fluctuating by 50 points or more reflecting greater financial instability. Student loan debt remains a central factor: 34% of Gen Z hold student loans, compared to just 17% of the overall population.

Nearly half of Gen Z respondents to a FICO/Harris Poll survey said they relied on credit cards or Buy Now, Pay Later loans in the past year after experiencing job or income loss.

The distribution of credit scores continues to fragment. Consumers in the middle score range (600749) have declined, dropping from 38.1% of the population in 2021 to 33.8% in 2025. More borrowers are clustering at either the high or low ends, a reflection of the uneven K-shaped recovery.

This data reflects a K-shaped economy, where consumers are experiencing different financial outcomes but also adapting in meaningful ways, said Tommy Lee, senior director of Predictive Scores and Analytics at FICO.

Car payments now top priority

The traditional payment hierarchy has shifted. Consumers are now 19% more likely to pay their auto loans than mortgages, placing vehicles at the top of repayment priorities. Mortgages still rank higher than personal loans and credit cards, while student loans now sit at the bottomeven for higher-scoring borrowers.

This reprioritization highlights how borrowers are strategically protecting essential assets like transportation, often critical for maintaining employment.

The report also tracked delinquency rates since 2021:

  • Auto loans: up 24%, with affordability a challenge across all score groups.

  • Credit cards: up 48%, as utilization climbed to 35.5%.

  • Mortgages: up 58%, though still below pre-pandemic levels.

  • Personal loans: declining, aided by tighter underwriting standards.

Despite financial pressures, Americans are increasingly proactive about tracking their credit health. The survey found:

  • 71% check their credit scores multiple times per year.

  • Nearly half of Gen Z (46%) and Millennials (45%) monitor their scores monthly.

  • 24% of Americans opened a new credit card in the past year, and 13% opened a personal loan as a financial cushion.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Drivers spending near record-low share of income on gasoline

Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:07:07 +0000

2025 marks the smallest fuel burden on household budgets in two decades.

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs
September 16, 2025
  • In 2025, drivers are expected to spend less than 2% of disposable income on gas the smallest share in two decades.

  • The average price of regular gasoline is $3.12 per gallon, down compared to last week, last month, and last year, with most states seeing decreases except parts of the West Coast facing infrastructure-related increases.

  • Prices range from as low as $2.68 in Mississippi to as high as $4.64 in California and Washington, though the median U.S. price is $2.95 per gallon, with many common prices under $3.



While restaurant bills can put a dent in your wallet, paying for the gasoline to get you to the restaurant wont. A report by the Energy Information Administration found that drivers are expected to spend the smallest share of their disposable income on gasoline this year than at any time in the past two decades.

The agencys report said less than 2% of people's personal disposable income will be spent on gasoline in 2025, down from an average of 2.4% over the previous decade. Excluding 2020, when the pandemic made gas incredibly cheap, thats the lowest percentage since 2025.

According to GasBuddy data, the national average price of gasoline is down 3.6 cents in just the last week and stands at $3.12 per gallon.

Thats 1.8 cents lower than a month ago and is 2.8 cents per gallon lower than a year ago. The national average price of diesel has decreased 2.6 cents in the last week and stands at $3.658 per gallon.

The West Coast is still expensive

While gas prices fell in more states than they rose last week, the West Coast continues to face challenges, with Oregon and Washington seeing some of the largest increases due to regional infrastructure issues, Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, said in the companys blog.

The good news is that the transition to cheaper winter gasoline begins across most of the nation, and with improvements underway in the West Coast market, I expect that average gas prices will continue to decline in the weeks ahead in most states assuming hurricane season remains quiet.

Drivers have benefited in two ways. First, gas prices have remained stable for months, making it easier to budget for fuel. Second, adjusted for inflation, gas prices are about the same as they were five decades ago.

In 1970, the national average retail price of regular gasoline in the United States was about $0.36 per gallon. To put that in perspective, adjusted for inflation, thats roughly $2.80$3.00 per gallon in todays dollars.

Below $3 a gallon

According to GasBuddy, the most common U.S. gas price encountered by motorists is $2.99 per gallon, unchanged from last week, followed by $2.89, $2.79, $3.09, and $2.69, rounding out the top five most common prices.

The median U.S. gas price is $2.95 per gallon, down 4 cents from last week and about 17 cents lower than the national average.

The top 10% of stations in the country average $4.45 per gallon, while the bottom 10% average $2.58 per gallon.

The states with the lowest average prices: Mississippi ($2.68), Oklahoma ($2.73), and Arkansas ($2.75).

The states with the highest average prices: California ($4.64), Washington ($4.64), and Hawaii ($4.45).


Read More ...


Consumer News: Toxic fumes in airline cabins raise concerns

Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:07:07 +0000

Airlines insist the fume events are rare

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs
September 16, 2025
  • Toxic fumes from engine oil and hydraulic fluids have been reported inside commercial aircraft cabins.

  • Flight attendants and passengers have described symptoms ranging from headaches to breathing difficulties.

  • Safety advocates are calling for more stringent monitoring and filtration systems.


For most travelers, stepping onto a plane means trusting in a finely tuned system of engineering and safety. But a little-known issue is troubling aviation experts: toxic fumes, sometimes known as fume events, can seep into commercial aircraft cabins, exposing passengers and crew to harmful chemicals, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal.

Commercial jet engines use synthetic oils and hydraulic fluids that can contain toxic additives. Under certain conditions, such as faulty seals, overheating, or mechanical wear, small amounts of these substances can leak into the air supply. Because most modern airplanes use a system called bleed air, drawing cabin air directly from the engines, fumes can enter the cabin circulation system undetected.

Symptoms among passengers and crew

Flight attendants unions have long warned about the health effects of fume events. Symptoms reported include dizziness, nausea, headaches, breathing problems, and, in some cases, long-term neurological issues. Passengers often chalk these experiences up to motion sickness or jet lag, meaning the true extent of the problem may be underreported.

Airlines maintain that fume events are rare, but they do occur worldwide. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) have both acknowledged the issue.

However, there are currently no mandatory systems on most aircraft to detect or filter toxic fumes. Some newer planes, like the Boeing 787, avoid bleed-air systems altogether, but the majority of the global fleet still relies on older designs.

What consumers should know

  • If you notice a strong chemical, oily, or dirty socks smell in the cabin, report it to the crew.

  • Document any symptoms you experience during or after the flight.

  • Flight attendants organizations recommend seeking medical attention if symptoms are severe or persistent.

Consumer safety groups are urging airlines to be more transparent about fume events and to install onboard sensors that can detect contaminated air in real time. Advocates argue that until detection and prevention become standard, passengers and crew remain vulnerable to invisible hazards at 30,000 feet.


Read More ...


Related Bing News Results

Consumer Spending Update: Economic Confidence Down Again in September

Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:24:00 GMT
Economic confidence decreased to 109.4 in this month’s Rasmussen Reports Economic Index, more than two points lower than August.

Consumer Reports: Does Lunchly make a healthy lunch kit?

Mon, 25 Aug 2025 07:58:00 GMT
Move over Lunchables–A competitor called Lunchly advertises a healthier spin on your kid’s favorite lunch kit—with bold claims, influencer hype, and flashy packaging. But how healthy are Lunchly ...

Consumer Reports: Digital wallet safety

Thu, 14 Aug 2025 12:26:00 GMT
From groceries to gas, more people are tapping their phones instead of swiping cards to pay. But what happens if that phone goes missing or falls into the wrong hands? Consumer Reports tells you how ...

Consumer Reports: Stricter testing to be required for child car seats

Fri, 08 Aug 2025 15:55:00 GMT
Tougher safety rules are on the way for car seats, focusing on dangerous side-impact crashes. Car seat manufacturers have made claims about side-impact protection, but there’s been no industry ...

5 affordable new cars that Consumer Reports recommends

Wed, 06 Aug 2025 06:24:00 GMT
While inflation rates have fallen substantially from their June 2022 peak of 9.1%, consumer prices are still rising, and the wave of tariffs introduced by the Trump administration in 2025 — ...


Blow Us A Whistle




Related Product Search/Búsqueda de productos relacionados