Agents are not as enthused about making less money on a sale

• New nationwide research shows sellers who cut buyer-agent commissions risk slower or failed sales.

• Properties offering lower commissions were 51% less likely to sell and took a third longer on the market.

• A recent $418 million NAR settlement gives buyers new leverage to negotiate agent compensation.

A new study offers the first nationwide evidence that real estate agents steer buyers away from homes with lower commissions. Analyzing 265,000 listings across 30 U.S. markets between June 2021 and February 2022, researchers found homes with the lowest buyer-agent commissions were 51% less likely to sell and lingered 33% longer on the market compared with homes offering higher payouts.

The research from the University of Texas at Austins McCombs School of Businesshelps explain why U.S. real estate commissions average 5% to 6% of a homes sale pricewell above countries like the U.K., where fees are closer to 1.5% to 2%. Sellers are highly incentivized to go ahead and offer very high compensation to buyer agents, said finance professor John Hatfield, who co-authored the study. The data also showed homes with lower commissions drew fewer online views, signaling reduced buyer interest from the start.

Lower commissions, slower sales

Both anecdotes and localized studies have previously pointed to the existence of steering. But Hatfields study presents the first systematic, nationwide evidence.

Researchers analyzed 265,000 listings in 30 markets across the country. Dated from June 2021 to February 2022, the listings included commissions offered to buyers agents.

For each market, the researchers calculated the going commission rate. They then broke properties into four groups, depending on how they compared with the going rates. In Austin, for example, the going rate was 3% for buyers agents, while the lowest group was below 2%.

They found that the lower the commission, the harder it was to sell the house:

• Houses with the lowest commissions were 51% less likely to sell at all than those with commissions at the going rate.
• Nationwide, houses in the lowest group got 8% fewer page views on the real estate brokerage website Redfin than those in the highest group, with those in between getting 4% fewer views. Fewer views indicate less interest among buyers.
• The lowest group took 33% longer to sell than the highest group, while in-between houses took 15% to 17% longer.

Thats strong evidence of steering, theUniversity of Texas'John Hatfieldsays. A seller offering a lower commission rate to buyer agents should be prepared to see fewer potential buyers.

Buyers may gain leverage under settlement

The findings come as the National Association of Realtors in 2024 agreed to a $418 million settlement in an antitrust case that reshaped how buyer agents can be compensated. Under the new framework, buyers can negotiate directly with their agents about pay, potentially pushing costs down. Hatfield says buyers should consider written contracts specifying how much their agent earnsand even arrange rebates if sellers offer above-market commissions. Think of it like negotiating when youre buying a car, he said.

Google's Gemini was the most inconsistent, compared to ChatGPT and Claude

By Truman Lewis of ConsumerAffairs

• RAND researchers tested ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini with 30 suicide-related questions.

• Chatbots handled very-high- and very-low-risk questions more consistently than intermediate ones.

• Experts say refinements are needed to ensure safe, effective mental health guidance.

Three widely used artificial intelligence chatbots give uneven responses when asked about suicide, according to a new RAND Corporation study. While the tools generally managed questions at the highest and lowest levels of suicide risk, they faltered when faced with inquiries that fell into a middle range of risk.

The study, published in Psychiatric Services, evaluated ChatGPT by OpenAI, Claude by Anthropic, and Gemini by Google. Researchers posed 30 suicide-related questions to each chatbot 100 times and compared the responses with assessments made by expert clinicians.

Performance varied across platforms

Researchers found that ChatGPT and Claude typically responded appropriately to very-low-risk questionssuch as identifying the state with the highest suicide rateand avoided giving direct answers to very-high-risk questions, like those about methods of suicide. Geminis responses were more inconsistent, sometimes declining even low-risk questions.

Intermediate-level questions, such as recommendations for someone experiencing suicidal thoughts, were where all three systems struggled. At times they generated helpful responses, while in other instances they refused to answer.

Here was Claude's response to a ConsumerAffairs query:

Researchers call for refinement

This work demonstrates that chatbots are aligned with expert assessments for very-low-risk and very-high-risk questions, but there remains significant variability in responses to questions at intermediary levels and from one chatbot platform to another, said Ryan McBain, the studys lead author and a senior policy researcher at RAND.

McBain said the inconsistencies highlight the need for further refinementsuch as reinforcement learning guided by cliniciansto ensure large language models provide safe and effective mental health information.

We asked ChatGPT how AI engines should respond to queries about suicide. Here's its partial response:

Potential risks for vulnerable users

The findings add to concerns that AI-powered chatbots, now used by millions worldwide, may dispense harmful advice to people experiencing mental health crises. Prior cases have shown instances where chatbot interactions may have encouraged suicidal behavior.

The study was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health. Co-authors include researchers from RAND, the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, and the Brown University School of Public Health.

In the sample responses above, both Claude and ChatGPT got around to warning users to seek professional help but not until the final lines of their responses.

The breach occurred July 28, 2025

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs

• TransUnion says more than 4.4 million peoples personal data was exposed after hackers accessed a third-party app used for U.S. consumer support.

• The breach occurred on July 28 and was detected on July 30; exposed data includes names, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers, according to state filings.

• Reporting links the theft to a broader wave of attacks targeting companies Salesforce environments, though TransUnion hasnt named the vendor.

Credit reporting giant TransUnion has begun notifying more than 4.4 million people that their personal information was compromised last month. The company said the cyber incident was tied to a third-party application used for its U.S. consumer support operations.

In state filings and statements, TransUnion said the intrusion occurred on July 28, 2025, and was discovered two days later. The company emphasized that no credit reports or core credit information were accessed.

A subsequent filing clarified that the exposed data includes names, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers elements that enable identity theft even without credit files. The company is offering affected individuals 24 months of free credit monitoring and fraud assistance.

While TransUnion did not identify the third-party platform, security researchers and reporters say the breach appears connected to a broader campaign in which threat actors exfiltrated data from organizations Salesforce instances. BleepingComputer, citing multiple sources including the ShinyHunters extortion group, reported that TransUnions stolen dataset was taken from its Salesforce account; SecurityWeek noted the possible Salesforce link and that similar attacks have hit other major brands this year. TransUnion has not confirmed those details.

Regulators were notified via the Office of the Maine Attorney General, a common venue for disclosure because it publishes breach notices publicly. TransUnion told Maine authorities that 4,461,511 individuals were impacted.

TechCrunch first reported the Maine and Texas filings and noted that the data elements include Social Security numbers.

The incident underscores the risk concentration in customer-support and CRM systems that store sensitive identifiers alongside service tickets and contact information. Recent advisories have warned of voice-phishing and session-hijacking campaigns aimed at cloud-hosted business apps, which can bypass traditional perimeter defenses once access is obtained.

What to do

Authorities say consumers should:

• Place a free freeze with TransUnion, Equifax, and Experian to block new credit lines; you can lift it temporarily when needed.

• Add a fraud alert if you dont want a full freeze; it requires lenders to take extra steps to verify your identity.

• Enroll in the offered monitoring and set account alerts for new applications, address changes, and hard inquiries.

• Watch your mail and email for phishing attempts referencing the breach, and use unique passwords plus a password manager.

Nearly 100 people have gotten sick

By Mark Huffman of ConsumerAffairs

• 95 people in 14 states sickened in a Salmonella outbreak linked to eggs

• Country Eggs, LLC recalls eggs distributed nationwide

• CDC warns some infections may resist common antibiotics

Federal health officials are investigating a multistate outbreak of Salmonella Enteritidis infections linked to eggs distributed by Country Eggs, LLC, prompting a nationwide recall of the products.

As of August 27, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports 95 confirmed cases of Salmonella infections across 14 states. At least 18 people have been hospitalized, though no deaths have been reported.

Illnesses were recorded between January 7 and July 26, 2025, with patients ranging in age from 1 to 91 years old. The median age of those sickened is 29, and 55% are female.

Health officials caution that the true number of infections is likely higher, since many people recover without medical care and are never tested for Salmonella. Because of reporting delays, more recent cases may still surface in the coming weeks.

Epidemiology points to eggs

Investigators interviewed 36 sick individuals, and 92% reported eating eggs in the week before falling ill. That rate is significantly higher than the 78% egg-consumption rate found in a national food survey, strongly suggesting eggs as the outbreak source.

State health agencies also identified sub-clusters of illness at four restaurants, all of which had served eggs during the period in question.

Using the CDCs PulseNet database, scientists determined through whole genome sequencing that bacterial samples from patients were closely related, meaning they likely originated from the same food source.

Of particular concern, bacteria from 94 patients showed resistance to nalidixic acid and reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, two commonly recommended antibiotics for Salmonella infections. While most patients recover without medication, resistant strains may complicate treatment for severe cases.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted traceback analysis, identifying Country Eggs, LLC as a common supplier for locations linked to the outbreak. On August 27, the company issued a voluntary recall of its eggs.