While many think light drinking isnt a risk, recent research says otherwise
-
Even light drinking (under seven drinks a week) showed no protective effect in the largest combined study to date.
-
Genetic analyses suggest the more alcohol youre predisposed to consume, the higher your dementia risk.
-
The drop in drinking before diagnosis hints that earlier studies showing benefits may have been misled by reverse causation.
If youve ever heard that a glass of wine a day is good for your brain, recent research suggests its time to pause and reconsider.
A new large-scale study combining observational data and genetic methods argues that any amount of alcohol might increase the risk of dementia. What looked like a protective effect of light or moderate drinking in past studies could, in fact, be a misleading artifact.
The findings challenge a long-held assumption: that low levels of alcohol are harmless or even beneficial for cognitive health.
Our study findings support a detrimental effect of all types of alcohol consumption on dementia risk, with no evidence supporting the previously suggested protective effect of moderate drinking, the researchers wrote.
The study
To tackle this question, researchers used two main strategies:
-
Observational data. They drew from two major biobank projects the U.S. Million Veteran Program and the U.K. Biobank to examine real-world drinking habits and incidence of dementia. Participants between 56 and 72 years old were followed over time until they developed dementia, died, or reached the end of follow-up (2019 for MVP, 2022 for UKB). Alcohol intake was self-reported (frequency, volume) and supplemented with the AUDIT-C screening tool for risky drinking behaviors (like binge drinking). In total, 559,559 people entered the observational analyses, and 14,540 developed dementia during the follow-up.
-
Mendelian randomization (genetic analysis). This method treats genetic variants associated with alcohol consumption as proxies (or instruments) for long-term drinking behavior. In this study, they considered three different genetic measures: predisposition toward average weekly drinks, risky drinking, and alcohol dependence. The goal: to minimize confounding (other factors influencing both drinking and dementia) and test whether a causal link might exist. For the genetic analyses, they drew on genome-wide association study (GWAS) data covering millions of people.
By combining both approaches, the researchers hoped to triangulate evidence: observations can show patterns, and genetics can help clarify whether those patterns suggest causation.
The results
In the observational analyses, the relationship between alcohol and dementia looked U-shaped. This means that both low and high levels of something are linked to worse outcomes, while moderate levels are linked to the best outcomes.
For this study, that looked like: both abstainers and heavy drinkers (40+ drinks/week) had about a 41% higher risk of dementia, compared with light drinkers (less than seven drinks per week). That figure climbed to 51% higher for those with alcohol dependence. That pattern might look like light drinking is protective but observational data alone can be misleading.
The genetic (Mendelian randomisation) analyses told a different story: there was no protective effect at low levels. Instead, dementia risk rose steadily with greater genetically predicted alcohol intake across all categories. For example, each additional one to three drinks per week (by genetic risk) was linked to a 15% higher dementia risk. Doubling the genetic propensity for alcohol dependence was tied to a 16% increased risk. In short, more drinking (genetically indicated) = more risk, in a roughly linear fashion.
One particularly telling insight: many individuals who were later diagnosed with dementia had gradually reduced their alcohol consumption in the years before diagnosis. That suggests that early (preclinical) brain changes might lead people to cut back a phenomenon called reverse causation. If so, earlier observational studies that found benefits from light drinking may have been capturing that effect, rather than a true benefit of alcohol.
The authors do note limitations: the strongest associations came from those of European ancestry (because of sample sizes), and Mendelian randomization depends on certain assumptions that cant be fully tested. Nonetheless, they conclude that their findings oppose the idea of a safe or beneficial low dose of alcohol for brain health and argue that reducing alcohol intake could be a meaningful strategy for dementia prevention.
Our findings highlight the importance of considering reverse causation and residual confounding in studies of alcohol and dementia, and they suggest that reducing alcohol consumption may be an important strategy for dementia prevention, the team wrote.
Posted: 2025-10-10 16:14:34