Rockin Robin SongFlying The Web For News.
RobinsPost Logo RobinsPost Amazon





Consumer Daily Reports

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Comedian Sarah Silverman, activist Ta-Nehisi Coates say "fair use" doctrine doesn't apply

By Truman Lewis Consumer News: Authors sue Meta alleging it used pirated books to train its AI systems of ConsumerAffairs
January 10, 2025

A group of authors, including Ta-Nehisi Coates and Sarah Silverman, have accused Facebook parent Meta Platforms of using pirated books to train its artificial intelligence systems with approval from CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

Coatesis an author, journalist, and activist. He gained a wide readership during his time as national correspondent at The Atlantic, where he wrote about cultural, social, and political issues, particularly regarding African Americans and white supremacy. Silverman is a comedianwho first rose to prominence for her brief stint as a writer and cast member on Saturday Night Live.

The authors allege that Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg knew about the pirating but approved using the material anyway. Their suit, filed in 2023, claims thatMeta used pirated works from a database called LibGen to train its AI, which includes millions of pirated books, and distributed them through torrents.

The suit accuses Meta ofcopyright infringement, arguing that the company misused their books to train its AI system, Llama.Meta hasargued that their actions fall under the "fair use" doctrine, use of such material falls under "fair use."

The fair use doctrine is a legal principle that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. It is part of U.S. copyright law and provides exceptions to the exclusive rights granted to copyright holders. The fair use doctrine is intended to balance the rights of creators with the public's interest in using creative works for certain purposes like education, commentary, or research.

The authors are now seeking to update their complaint, based on new evidence showing that Meta knowingly used pirated content. They also want to revive certain claims, including allegations that Meta illegally stripped their books' copyright information.

What about fair use?

Whether or not Zuckerberg knew about the copying, the case revolves around whether copying an entire book can possibly be considered fair use.

In determining whether a use qualifies as fair use, courts consider four factors, according to Cornell Law School'sLegal Information Institute:

  1. Purpose and Character of the Use: This looks at whether the use is for commercial or non-commercial purposes and whether it transforms the original work. Uses that are educational, non-profit, or transformative (e.g., using a work in a way that adds new meaning or value) are more likely to be considered fair use.

  2. Nature of the Copyrighted Work: This considers whether the work is factual or creative. Factual works are more likely to be subject to fair use than highly creative works (like novels or movies).

  3. Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used: The less of the work you use, the more likely it is to be considered fair use. However, even a small portion may be too much if it's considered the "heart" of the work.

  4. Effect on the Market or Value of the Work: If the use negatively impacts the market value or potential sales of the original work, it's less likely to be considered fair use. If the use does not affect the market for the original work, its more likely to be deemed fair use.

Examples of fair use include:

  • Quoting or paraphrasing a work in a review, commentary, or academic paper.
  • Using brief excerpts of a copyrighted work in a parody or satire.
  • Reproducing a copyrighted work for educational or non-profit purposes.

Fair use is not always clear-cut and often requires a case-by-case analysis or, as in this case, litigation.

The fair use doctrine is discussed in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 (Title 17 of the U.S. Code). This section outlines the factors that courts should consider when determining whether a particular use of copyrighted material qualifies as fair use.

For further details on the fair use doctrine, you can refer to the U.S. Copyright Office's official page:



Photo Credit: Consumer Affairs News Department Images


Posted: 2025-01-10 19:58:58

Get Full News Story On Consumer Affairs



Listen to this article. Speaker link opens in a new window.
Text To Speech BETA Test Version.



More News From This Category
Consumer News: Safety Warning: HALO Bolt AC-DC charger
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 23:07:07 +0000

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is warning of a serious fire risk involving the HALO Bolt AC-DC charger

By News Desk of ConsumerAffairs
November 14, 2025

Consumers with chargers made before December 2020 should stop using them and dispose of them properly.

  • Fire and burn hazard from aging lithium-ion batteries

  • Affects HALO Bolt ACDC 58830 units made in or before December 2019

  • Stop use immediately and follow local disposal rules


Consumers are being warned to immediately stop using HALO Bolt ACDC 58830 portable chargers manufactured in or before December 2019. Reports include burn injuries and property damage due to the chargers catching fire. The risk is linked to the age of the product and its lithium-ion battery.

The affected chargers were sold at Best Buy and other retailers, both in stores and online, including QVC.com and Amazon.com. The chargers can be identified by the brand HALO on top and the model BOLT ACDC 58830 on the back label. Only units with a manufacturing year code of 16, 17, 18 or 19 are affected.

The hazard

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has received reports of these HALO chargers catching fire. One burn injury and several instances of property damage have been reported. The hazard is connected to lithium-ion battery failures, particularly in products manufactured before December 2019.

What to do

Consumers should immediately stop using the HALO Bolt ACDC 58830 portable chargers made in or before December 2019. Dispose of the product in accordance with state and local ordinances for battery-powered devices. Do not attempt to use, repair or charge the affected units.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Poll finds rising GLP-1 use but persistent cost barriers
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 23:07:07 +0000

The cost is a leading reason people stop taking the meds

By Truman Lewis of ConsumerAffairs
November 14, 2025

One in eight U.S. adults now take GLP-1 drugs, but many struggle to afford them
Cost is a leading reason people stop using the medications
Most Americans doubt Trump administration policies will lower drug prices


About one in eight U.S. adults (12%) say they are currently taking a GLP-1 medication such as Ozempic or Wegovy for weight loss, diabetes, heart disease or another chronic condition, a new KFF Health Tracking Poll shows. Thats a notable increase from 18 months ago, even as many users report difficulty affording the drugs high price tags.

Nearly one in five adults (18%) say they have used a GLP-1 drug at some point. Women are more likely than men to report current use (15% vs. 9%), and uptake is highest among adults ages 50 to 64 (22%). Use drops sharply among those 65 and older (9%), reflecting Medicares continued prohibition on covering GLP-1 drugs when prescribed for weight loss alone.

Use is highest among those managing chronic conditions

GLP-1 medications are especially common among adults who report serious health conditions. More than half of adults diagnosed with diabetes (57%) say they have used the drugs, including 45% who are currently taking them. Use is also widespread among those with heart disease (40% ever; 29% currently) and among people diagnosed as obese or overweight in the past five years (34% ever; 23% currently).

Yet insurance coverage remains uneven. While most users say their insurer paid at least part of the cost, more than a quarter of insured users (27%) say they paid the full cost themselves.

Cost remains a major obstacle

The pollconducted before the Trump administrations latest policy announcements on GLP-1 coveragefinds that more than half of current or former GLP-1 users (56%) say the medications were difficult to afford. Even among those with insurance, 55% report affordability challenges.

Cost is among the most common reasons people stop taking the drugs. Fourteen percent of users say they discontinued treatment because they could not afford it, while 13% cite side effects and just 5% say they stopped because their condition improved.

Other barriers also persist. Roughly one in six GLP-1 users (17%) say they obtained the drugs online, and nearly one in ten (9%) say they got them from a medical spaan indication of the growing gray market around the blockbuster medications.

Among adults who have never taken a GLP-1 drug, interest in weight-loss use remains strong. About one in five (22%) say they would consider taking one, including 7% who say they are very interested. Interest is especially high43%among adults diagnosed as obese or overweight but not currently using such drugs.

Many skeptical that Trump policies will lower drug prices

Public expectations are low for the Trump administrations efforts to lower drug costs, including new Medicaid rebate deals, discounted IVF medications, and a proposed TrumpRx purchasing portal. Nearly two-thirds of adults (62%) say these measures are not too likely or not at all likely to reduce costs for people like them.

Partisan divides are stark: 73% of Republicans and 83% of self-identified MAGA supporters believe the administration will lower drug prices, compared to 33% of independents and just 9% of Democrats.

Medicare enrollees are more optimistic. About half (49%) of adults 65 and older with Medicare say they expect Trumps policies to lower their prescription costsoutpacing adults with employer coverage (34%) or Medicaid (32%).

Many still struggle to pay for prescriptions

Across the broader public, one in four adults (26%) say they or someone in their household had trouble paying for prescription medications in the past year. The burden is heavier among uninsured adults (41%), Hispanic adults (33%), Black adults (32%) and those with household incomes below $40,000 (33%).

The KFF survey was conducted Oct. 27Nov. 2, 2025, among a nationally representative sample of 1,350 U.S. adults, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.


Read More ...


Consumer News: UK ruling says that Windows and Office licenses can be resold
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 23:07:06 +0000

Microsoft says it will appeal the ruling, which strikes at the heart of its business model

By James R. Hood of ConsumerAffairs
November 14, 2025

UK tribunal says Microsoft licenses can be legally resold
Ruling rejects Microsofts copyright claim; company plans to appeal
Decision clears path for resellers 270M damages case to proceed


Microsoft says it will challenge a decision by the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) that strikes at the heart of its long-standing restrictions on reselling software licenses. The tribunal ruled that perpetual licenses for products such as Windows and Microsoft Office can legally be resoldrejecting Microsofts argument that such activity infringes its copyright.

The case dates back to 2021, when UK reseller ValueLicensing sued Microsoft over contractual terms that barred customers from reselling previously issued licenses. The reseller argued that these restrictions violated the principles of the European Software Directive and had cost the company millions in lost revenue.

Microsoft initially fought the claim on contractual grounds, but later advanced a copyright infringement theory. Because Office programs include interface elements such as icons and graphics, the company argued they should be treated as original artistic works, making license resale a copyright violation.

Judges dismissed that argument, saying the presence of such graphics does not convert software licenses into copyrighted creative works that restrict resale. Customers holding perpetual licenses are free to resell them, the tribunal saidechoing a decade-old precedent set in the UKs UsedSoft case.

The ruling could make it easier and cheaper for UK consumers and businesses to obtain Windows 11 or Office through the secondary market if it holds up on appeal.

ValueLicensing says decision validates its business

ValueLicensing has always believed it was running a legitimate business underpinned by the principles of the European Software Directive and the UsedSoft judgment at the ECJ, the companys managing director said following the ruling. This judgment confirms these principles, which legitimately allowed ValueLicensing to save its customers money on used Microsoft software.

The company said it now plans to refocus on the core of its lawsuit, which seeks damages for what it alleges were unlawful restrictions that hampered its business.

Case moves to damages phase and more litigation awaits

With the copyright argument dismissed, Microsoft will need a new defense as the lawsuit proceeds. If it ultimately loses, the company could face millions in damages to ValueLicensing.

But the financial risk doesnt end there. Microsoft is also tied up in a separate, similar class-action suit alleging abuse of market dominance and anti-competitive licensing practicesexposure that could reach into the billions.

For a company long accustomed to accusations of restrictive contracts and inflated pricing, the latest rulings add to a familiar pattern of legal headaches. Yet with Microsofts valuation supercharged by the AI boom, the litigation may amount to little more than a costly distraction for the tech giant.


Read More ...


Consumer News: UK ruling that says Windows and Office licenses can be resold
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 20:07:07 +0000

Microsoft says it will appeal the ruling, which strikes at the heart of its business model

By James R. Hood of ConsumerAffairs
November 14, 2025

UK tribunal says Microsoft licenses can be legally resold
Ruling rejects Microsofts copyright claim; company plans to appeal
Decision clears path for resellers 270M damages case to proceed


Microsoft says it will challenge a decision by the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) that strikes at the heart of its long-standing restrictions on reselling software licenses. The tribunal ruled that perpetual licenses for products such as Windows and Microsoft Office can legally be resoldrejecting Microsofts argument that such activity infringes its copyright.

The case dates back to 2021, when UK reseller ValueLicensing sued Microsoft over contractual terms that barred customers from reselling previously issued licenses. The reseller argued that these restrictions violated the principles of the European Software Directive and had cost the company millions in lost revenue.

Microsoft initially fought the claim on contractual grounds, but later advanced a copyright infringement theory. Because Office programs include interface elements such as icons and graphics, the company argued they should be treated as original artistic works, making license resale a copyright violation.

Judges dismissed that argument, saying the presence of such graphics does not convert software licenses into copyrighted creative works that restrict resale. Customers holding perpetual licenses are free to resell them, the tribunal saidechoing a decade-old precedent set in the UKs UsedSoft case.

The ruling could make it easier and cheaper for UK consumers and businesses to obtain Windows 11 or Office through the secondary market if it holds up on appeal.

ValueLicensing says decision validates its business

ValueLicensing has always believed it was running a legitimate business underpinned by the principles of the European Software Directive and the UsedSoft judgment at the ECJ, the companys managing director said following the ruling. This judgment confirms these principles, which legitimately allowed ValueLicensing to save its customers money on used Microsoft software.

The company said it now plans to refocus on the core of its lawsuit, which seeks damages for what it alleges were unlawful restrictions that hampered its business.

Case moves to damages phase and more litigation awaits

With the copyright argument dismissed, Microsoft will need a new defense as the lawsuit proceeds. If it ultimately loses, the company could face millions in damages to ValueLicensing.

But the financial risk doesnt end there. Microsoft is also tied up in a separate, similar class-action suit alleging abuse of market dominance and anti-competitive licensing practicesexposure that could reach into the billions.

For a company long accustomed to accusations of restrictive contracts and inflated pricing, the latest rulings add to a familiar pattern of legal headaches. Yet with Microsofts valuation supercharged by the AI boom, the litigation may amount to little more than a costly distraction for the tech giant.


Read More ...


Consumer News: Why fake cameras and unlocked doors aren’t protecting your home
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 20:07:07 +0000

New ADT insights reveal how common shortcuts leave families more vulnerable than we think

By Kristen Dalli of ConsumerAffairs
November 14, 2025

  • Many common home-security habits like relying on fake cameras or leaving doors unlocked offer comfort, not real protection.

  • New ADT data shows 72% of people who use these shortcuts admit theyre only occasionally effective at preventing theft or break-ins.

  • Experts say upgrading to real, connected security devices with professional monitoring is the best way to keep your home truly safe.

When it comes to protecting our homes, many of us lean on habits that feel smart but dont actually keep us safer.

Maybe youve stuck a fake camera above the garage, rely on a Protected by sign from a hardware store, or assume nothing bad will happen if you leave the front door unlocked just this once.

Outdated methods of home protection

According to new ADT data, these shortcuts may be doing more harm than good.

The numbers are eye-opening: 38% of Americans use decoy security items, and another 38% admit they regularly or occasionally leave their front door unlocked. Even more striking, 72% of people who depend on these habits say theyre only sometimes effective at preventing break-ins or theft.

ConsumerAffairs interviewed Jimmy Lin, Vice President of Product Management at ADT to learn more about these behaviors and how consumers can actually stay safe.

Criminals know whats fake

According to Lin, these methods are increasingly less effective as criminals learn the common decoys and safe-ish security habits.

They can often spot a fake camera or notice when a sign doesnt match the equipment on the house which can identify your house as an even bigger target, he said. And with the false sense of security they provide, homeowners can neglect important measures like locking doors and windows, leaving them at risk.

Lin explained that homeowners are ultimately the ones at risk when they opt for these types of safety measures.

The biggest risk with using safe-ish practices is thinking you're protected when you're not, Lin said. It can lead people to let their guard down, delay real action, or ignore signs of vulnerability. Our research found that 72% of people who rely on these kinds of habits admit theyre only occasionally effective, proving its not worth the risk.

Prioritize safety

Homeowners are encouraged to adopt real, trusted security measures to ensure safety in their homes.

To be truly safe, replace decoys with real, connected devices from a trusted security brand, Lin said. Complete with indoor and outdoor security cameras, door and window sensors, security alarms, and motion sensors, a full security system especially one with 24/7 professional monitoring is the best way to keep you and your home safe at all times.

Security systems also allow you to have alerts whether its for motion detection, package delivery, or an open door, so you know whats happening in real time."


Read More ...


Related Bing News Results
Consumer Spending Update: Economic Confidence Declines Again in November
Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:11:00 GMT
Economic confidence decreased to 98.6 in this month’s Rasmussen Reports Economic Index, more than seven points lower than October.

Dangerous Chainsaw Problem Prompts Huge Recall: What To Know
Sat, 01 Nov 2025 10:00:00 GMT
Nearly 100,000 battery-powered chainsaws are being recalled after reports of brake failure that caused at least one injury, federal officials said.Milwaukee Tool issued the recall for about 90,860 of ...

Consumer Reports |Experts warn against daily use of protein supplements
Mon, 20 Oct 2025 22:57:00 GMT
Protein powders and shakes are more popular than ever, often touted as workout fuel or even meal replacements. But a new Consumer Reports investigation reveals a hidden risk: some of these supplements ...

Consumer Reports: Supporting older drivers
Mon, 20 Oct 2025 15:48:00 GMT
Shopping for a new car can be stressful, and if you are an older driver, there are extra things to consider, from comfort and visibility to safety features to how much you will pay for insurance.

Your Daily Protein Shake Might Be Exposing You to Lead, Consumer Reports Finds
Tue, 14 Oct 2025 03:10:00 GMT
Plant-based powders, particularly those made with pea protein, were found to have the highest lead levels — and only a handful of brands were deemed safe for regular use in the nonprofit’s analysis. A ...


Blow Us A Whistle


Related Product Search/Búsqueda de productos relacionados

Amazon Logo