Consumer News: Antitrust showdown begins today: FTC vs. Meta

Choose a language:

Consumer Daily Reports

Details: Written by Consumer Affairs News; Category: Consumer Daily Reports; Published: 14 April 2025; Created: 14 April 2025; Last Updated: 14 April 2025

This could be the trial that reshapes social media forever

April 14, 2025

Key takeaways:

Landmark case begins as FTC seeks to break up Meta over Instagram, WhatsApp deals
Tech executives, including Zuckerberg, expected to testify in trial extending into summer
Trumps possible intervention adds political tension to high-stakes court battle

After nearly six years of legal wrangling, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Monday began its antitrust trial against Meta, in a historic case that could lead to the breakup of the $1.4 trillion tech giant behind Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

If the FTC persuades U.S. District Judge James Boasberg that Meta illegally built a monopoly through its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, it could force the company to divest its core platforms a move not seen since the breakup of AT&T four decades ago.

The case launched under Trumps first term, expanded during Bidens presidency, and now proceeding under Trump-appointed FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson has already endured years of setbacks. Judge Boasberg initially dismissed the FTCs original 2021 filing, questioning the agencys evidence of market dominance. A revised version was allowed to proceed in 2022, and the case is now finally going to trial.

Despite the FTCs persistence, Boasberg has continued to express skepticism, saying in court filings the governments argument strains this countrys creaking antitrust precedents. Whether the FTC can prove Metas purchases were anticompetitive in a now more diverse social media landscape with TikTok, YouTube, X, and others remains a key hurdle.

Star witnesses and public scrutiny

A parade of tech leaders are expected to testify during the trial, including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, former COO Sheryl Sandberg, and top executives from WhatsApp and Instagram. Rivals like Snap, Pinterest, and TikTok may also take the stand.

These high-profile testimonies could reveal internal strategies and competitive concerns that influenced Metas biggest acquisitions. The case will also test how companies like Meta define competition in a digital age where platforms often blend features and audiences.

Trumps role could shift the outcome

President Trump, who has recently reconnected with Zuckerberg, could intervene at any point. Though the FTC traditionally operates independently, Trump has asserted unprecedented influence over the agency firing Democratic commissioners and signaling that Ferguson would follow his lead.

Zuckerbergs recent efforts to align Meta with Republican values and elevate GOP voices in leadership roles have fueled speculation that Trump might move to settle or soften the case particularly if Meta appears likely to lose.

Whats at stake:

The trial, which could run into July, will determine not only the future of Metas empire, but also the power of antitrust regulators to rein in Big Tech. With global implications for corporate consolidation, political power, and digital competition, the verdict may reshape the internet as we know it.

Sign up below for The Daily Consumer, our newsletter on the latest consumer news, including recalls, scams, lawsuits and more.

Posted: 2025-04-14 02:32:52

Get Full News Story On Consumer Affairs

Listen to this article. Speaker link opens in a new window.
Text To Speech BETA Test Version.

More News From This Category
Consumer News: Bipartisan senators offer bill they say would make homes more affordable
Mon, 02 Mar 2026 17:07:07 +0000

The measure would stop hedge funds from buying single-family homes

By Mark Huffman

of ConsumerAffairs

March 2, 2026

A bipartisan group of U.S. senators has introduced legislation aimed at preventing private equity firms from purchasing single-family homes.
Lawmakers say the measure is designed to ease housing affordability pressures and curb investor-driven price spikes.
The proposal reflects growing concern in both parties over Wall Streets expanding role in the residential housing market.

Its not often these days that Republicans and Democrats in Congress can agree that a bill needs to be passed. However, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) are cosponsoring a bill to bar private investment firms from buying up single-family homes.

In his State of the Union address last week, President Trump also lent his support to the idea.

Supporters argue that large-scale investor purchases have intensified competition for homes, driving up prices and rents and putting homeownership further out of reach for middle-class families.

Wall Street has exploited the American housing crisis, turning the nations housing stock into a portfolio of rental properties, Hawley said in a statement. Families deserve to be able to buy their own homes and achieve the American dream without competing with big investment companies that irrevocably drive up housing prices. Thats why I am introducing legislation to ban Wall Street from buying single-family homes once and for all.

Small investors not affected

The legislation would apply specifically to private equity firms and other institutional investors that manage pooled funds on behalf of outside investors. Individual landlords and smaller-scale real estate investors would not be subject to the ban. Lawmakers say the goal is to curb large-scale acquisitions that can shift entire neighborhood markets, rather than penalize small property owners.

Under the proposal, covered firms that currently own single-family rental homes would be required to sell those properties within a set timeframe, potentially three to five years. Penalties for noncompliance could include financial fines and restrictions on future real estate activity.

The legislation would reverse a trend that began during the housing market crash of 2009-10, when millions of subprime foreclosures flooded the market with homes, dragging down prices. Seeing bargains, large investors bought up thousands of homes for rental property, effectively taking them off the market and creating shortages, which in turn drove up prices.

The issue of affordability

Housing affordability has become an increasingly urgent issue nationwide. Home prices surged during the pandemic-era buying boom, fueled by low interest rates and limited housing supply. Although mortgage rates have since risen, prices in many markets remain elevated, and inventory continues to lag demand.

Supporters of the bill argue that when private equity firms purchase homes in bulk often making all-cash offers they can outcompete individual buyers and contribute to upward pressure on prices. Some research suggests institutional investors account for a significant share of purchases in certain markets, though nationally they still represent a minority of total homeownership.

The push-back

Industry groups have pushed back on similar proposals in the past, arguing that institutional investors provide rental housing options and professional property management at scale. They also contend that the primary driver of high housing costs is insufficient new construction, not investor ownership.

Real estate and private equity trade associations are expected to oppose the measure, saying it could reduce rental supply and discourage investment in housing development. They may also raise concerns about potential legal challenges, particularly regarding property rights and retroactive divestment requirements.

The bills prospects in Congress remain uncertain. While bipartisan sponsorship increases its visibility, housing policy proposals that directly restrict private investment often face strong lobbying opposition and procedural hurdles. Still, the introduction of the legislation underscores a rare area of cross-party agreement: that housing affordability has become a political and economic flashpoint demanding federal attention.

Consumer News: New IRS webpage makes it easier to report fraud
Mon, 02 Mar 2026 17:07:07 +0000

Theres now a report fraud tab on the IRS home page

By Mark Huffman

of ConsumerAffairs

March 2, 2026

The IRS has launched a new Report Fraud web page to make it easier for taxpayers to confidentially report suspected tax fraud, and evasion.
The page consolidates multiple reporting options into a single location at IRS.gov/SubmitATip and through a new button on the IRS homepage.
The agency says internal improvements will help it better process referrals and crack down on illegal tax activity.

The Internal Revenue Service has unveiled a new online tool designed to simplify how

taxpayers report suspected tax fraud and related , part of a broader effort to strengthen enforcement and improve how tips are handled inside the agency.

The new web page, accessible through a Report Fraud button on the IRS.gov homepage or directly at IRS.gov/SubmitATip, centralizes previously scattered reporting options into one streamlined location. Taxpayers can use the page to confidentially report suspected tax fraud, evasion, or other tax-related illegal activities.

IRS Chief Executive Officer Frank J. Bisignano said the changes are intended to make the reporting process more user-friendly while addressing longstanding internal inefficiencies.

Improvements to the IRS fraud reporting system make reporting suspected wrongdoing easier and simpler and will address historic challenges that had prevented the IRS from making maximum use of the referrals it receives, Bisignano said.

By reporting suspected tax fraud or , taxpayers play an important role in uncovering fraud and supporting the integrity of the nations tax system.

Report fraud ASAP

The IRS is encouraging taxpayers to report suspected wrongdoing as soon as possible, saying timely tips can help the agency more effectively address fraud and noncompliance.

While the new web page represents the first phase of the effort, officials described it as part of a longer-term modernization plan. Future updates are expected to reduce the number of forms required to submit tips, automate certain processes and incorporate modern case management software to better track and evaluate referrals.

Historically, the IRS has faced challenges in fully leveraging the information it receives from the public. According to the agency, creating fewer work streams, simplifying submission procedures and improving internal processing will make it easier to act on credible leads.

The IRS said the changes are aimed at strengthening enforcement capabilities while making it more straightforward for taxpayers to participate in protecting the integrity of the federal tax system.

Consumer News: The states where groceries hurt the most — and what you can do about it
Mon, 02 Mar 2026 14:07:07 +0000

The real grocery crisis isnt price its paycheck

By Kyle James of ConsumerAffairs

February 27, 2026

States like Mississippi and West Virginia rank highest because groceries take a bigger bite of lower incomes.
Consider cutting convenience foods, swap to store brands, and reduce waste. Even a small drop in how much of your paycheck goes to groceries can save hundreds a year.
Check unit prices every time. Bigger isnt always cheaper. Compare cost per ounce, pivot when items spike, and swap in frozen or alternate proteins to stay flexible.

Grocery prices are up over 20% since 2019, according to USDA data. However, heres the twist that most people miss:

The states where groceries cost the most arent necessarily the states with the highest food prices.

In actuality, they are the states where incomes are the lowest.

A new analysis from WalletHub found that residents in states like Mississippi, West Virginia, and Arkansas spend the highest percentage of their income on groceries, even though many of those states actually have relatively low food prices.

For example:

Mississippi households spend about 2.6% of their median monthly income on groceries the highest in the nation.
West Virginia follows closely at 2.54%.
Arkansas takes third and clocks in at 2.44%.

Meanwhile, residents in Massachusetts and New Jersey spend just around 1.5%, even though their grocery prices are often higher.

That begs the obvious question: Whats the difference?

Income. It all boils down to a states median income.

When incomes are lower, even those cheap groceries tend to feel expensive for families.

Heres an actionable playbook for you to try if groceries are eating a big chunk of your paycheck every month.

1. Stop budgeting groceries last budget them first

Most people build a budget around their fixed expenses like rent, insurance, and utilities. Then they see whats leftover and try to estimate what they can realistically spend on food.

Try flipping that script on its head.

Set a weekly food number first, then reverse-engineer your shopping list to fit it. That will inevitably end up forcing better buying decisions in the grocery aisle.

Pro tip: Start by creating a staples first rule. This would include protein, produce, rice, pasta, and beans. Then add your luxury items only if theres room left in your budget.

2. Focus on percentage of income not just price tags

If your income is tight, the goal isnt just to find the cheapest store. Its to actually reduce how much of your paycheck goes to food overall.

That means:

Fewer impulse convenience foods
More bulk basics
Swapping name brands for store brands
Reducing food waste

Even small wins like trimming your grocery share from 2.6% to 2.2% of income can free up hundreds per year.

3. Track unit price closely

Inflation has made comparison shopping mandatory.

Always check:

Cost per ounce
Cost per pound
Cost per serving

Buying in bulk from Costco and Sams Club doesnt automatically mean better deals. Sometimes the smaller size wins, which means you need to be checking unit price, otherwise youre just guessing.

4. Watch income creep before grocery creep

In higher-income states, grocery costs take up a smaller percentage of earnings, even if the prices are higher.

Theres a lesson hidden there.

As your income rises, resist the urge to upgrade every food purchase to a more expensive brands. Keep buying like you did before the raise and bank the difference.

5. Adjust by season, not by habit

If eggs spike in your state (West Virginia, for example, ranks higher in egg prices), pivot to alternative proteins temporarily.

When produce is high, lean into cheaper frozen veggies.

Grocery prices are dynamic and constantly changing. Your shopping strategy should be too.

Consumer News: Valley Springs bottled water recalled over contamination concerns
Mon, 02 Mar 2026 14:07:06 +0000

More than 650,000 units are affected

By Mark Huffman

of ConsumerAffairs

March 2, 2026

Nearly 651,000 gallons of bottled water recalled in Illinois and Wisconsin over sanitary concerns.
FDA classifies the action as a Class II recall, citing products bottled under insanitary conditions.
Recall remains ongoing; no press release has been issued by the company.

Valley Springs Artesian Gold, LLC is recalling nearly 651,000 units of bottled water distributed in Illinois and Wisconsin after federal regulators determined the products were bottled under insanitary conditions. Some bottles may have also been distributed to other states.

The recall, identified by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as Event ID 98410, was initiated voluntarily by the Portage, Wisconsin-based company on Feb. 6, 2026. The FDA classified the action as a Class II recall on Feb. 26, indicating that use of the product could cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences, though the risk of serious harm is considered remote.

The recall covers three one-gallon (128 fl. oz.) plastic jug products with plastic caps:

Valley Springs 100% Natural Bottled Water (UPC 0 31193-00701 9), totaling 379,868 units.
Valley Springs 100% Natural Bottled Water with Fluoride Added (UPC 0 31193-01301 0), totaling 7,840 units.
Valley Springs Steamed Distilled Water (UPC 0 31193-00601 2), totaling 263,440 units.

What to know

In total, 651,148 units are affected. The FDA report lists water was bottled under insanitary conditions as the reason for the recall. The agency did not specify the exact nature of the sanitary deficiencies in its enforcement report.

The company notified consignees and/or the public using multiple communication methods, including combinations of email, fax, letter, press release, telephone, or in-person visits, according to the FDA filing. However, the enforcement report notes that no formal press release was issued specifically for the recall.

As of the FDAs latest update, the recall remains ongoing and has not been terminated.

Consumers who purchased one-gallon Valley Springs bottled water products in Illinois or Wisconsin are advised to check the UPC codes and discontinue use of affected items. Retailers and distributors have been instructed to remove the products from sale.

Consumer News: What the attack on Iran could mean for gas prices
Mon, 02 Mar 2026 14:07:06 +0000

Oil prices have jumped, but so far, there has been little effect at the pump

By Mark Huffman

of ConsumerAffairs

March 2, 2026

Its been a fast-moving 48 hours in global energy markets following major developments involving Iran and renewed tensions in the Middle East.
With so many headlines hitting at once, its important to separate what is actually happening from what is simply being speculated.
Early market reactions are driven more by risk pricing than confirmed supply disruptions but uncertainty itself is now a key driver of energy costs.

The U.S. and allied military strikes on Iran over the weekend have roiled global energy markets, immediately pushing crude oil prices higher as traders price in geopolitical risk and the specter of further escalation. While the Strait of Hormuz a maritime chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of the worlds oil supply passes remains open, fears around its potential closure or disruption have intensified price volatility.

In the wake of the attacks, benchmark crude prices surged sharply when trading resumed, with Brent and U.S. oil futures climbing sharply amid concern over regional stability.

Analysts note that markets are currently pricing in elevated geopolitical risk rather than confirmed cuts in production or exports. According to recent industry analysis, while leadership turmoil in Tehran adds uncertainty, it does not at this stage equate to lost supply. Strategic risk premiums are being built into oil pricing, pushing wholesale fuel costs up before any physical disruptions occur.

Interestingly, the national average gasoline price has edged lower in some areas due to routine price cycling, GasBuddy said in an analysis over the weekend. That relief is likely temporary.

Short-term gas prices may rise

Despite some localized short-term price relief driven by routine gas station price cycling, experts say this softness is likely temporary. As oil markets reopen fully and wholesale costs adjust to the heightened risk environment, pressure on pump prices is expected to return.

Recent projections suggest the national average U.S. gasoline price could creep back above $3.00 per gallon, with room for an additional 1015 cent increase over the coming week or two depending on broader oil market behavior.

This aligns with forecasts from GasBuddys analytics team, who caution that without physical supply disruptions, increases will likely be incremental rather than explosive barring escalation beyond current tensions.

Why the Strait of Hormuz matters

The Strait of Hormuz remains a focal point for global energy flow, and its status greatly influences market psychology. Although shipping continues for now, the threat of Iranian attempts to disrupt tanker traffic or even warnings that have already caused some vessels to anchor outside the strait have introduced additional costs and risk premiums into the market.

Analysts say the key factor for prices isnt the current flow of oil but what might happen if the conflict escalates and significantly impacts oil distribution routes. Historically, markets have tended to spike on fear and uncertainty long before any physical constraints occur.

Related Bing News Results
Trader Joe's Daily Facial Sunscreen SPF 40
Wed, 25 Feb 2026 05:13:00 GMT
We've tested and reviewed products since 1936. Read CR's review of the Trader Joe's Daily Facial Sunscreen SPF 40 sunscreen to find out if it's worth it.

5 top e-bikes you can buy right now, ranked by Consumer Reports
Sat, 21 Feb 2026 05:15:00 GMT
Consumer Reports has spent months testing motors, batteries, handling, and comfort to identify the best electric bikes for everyday riders. Its scoring turns a crowded market into a clear hierarchy, ...

Consumer Reports retests protein powders, finds safer options
Wed, 18 Feb 2026 20:22:00 GMT
Researchers have tested more popular brands, including five reader-requested chocolate protein powders from Clean Simple Eats, Equate, Premier Protein, Ritual and Truvani.

CR Investigates: Toxic beauty ingredients
Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:52:00 GMT
Most of us don’t think twice about shampoo, deodorant, or lotion. Now, Consumer Reports reveals that some of those products may contain ingredients linked to cancer risk, hormone disruption, and other ...

Consumer Reports Investigates: What you need to know about toxic beauty ingredients
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:57:00 GMT
Most of us don’t think twice about shampoo, deodorant, lotion or makeup. We lather, rub, and apply daily without a second thought. But the cosmetics industry uses thousands of chemicals in the ...

🔎 Search This Topic on Popular Platforms