Earlier recalls tried to solve the problem but may not have succeeded

• Despite earlier recalls, the problem may still be occurring, with nearly 20 incidents reported.
• The transmission may shift out of park without the driver pressing the brake pedal, the agency said.
• About 1.2 million Ram trucks could be affected if another recall is ordered.

U.S. auto safety regulators have launched a new investigation into whether earlier recalls involving more than one million Ram pickup trucks sufficiently addressed a dangerous defect that can cause the vehicles to roll away unexpectedly.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said it has received at least 20 reports suggesting that the original recall repairs failed to fix the issue, leading to further incidents including six cases where seven people were injured and 12 incidents that resulted in a crash or fire.

At the center of the investigation is a flaw that may allow the trucks transmission to shift out of park without the driver pressing the brake pedal or even having the key in the ignition. Such a malfunction could let the truck move on its own, posing a significant risk to drivers and bystanders.

Scope of the investigation

The recall query announced by NHTSA covers roughly 1.2 million Ram pickups built between the 2013 and 2018 model years. The vehicles were subject to earlier safety recalls in 2017 and 2018 addressing this same issue.

In December 2017, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (now part of Stellantis NV) recalled approximately 1.48 million Ram trucks under NHTSA recall number 17V821000, citing concerns that the brake transmission shift interlock (BTSI) could fail in high-temperature conditions.

According to the official recall notice, If the BTSI becomes inoperative, the shifter can be moved out of Park without depressing the brake pedal or having the key in the ignition. Being able to shift the transmission without the key in the ignition increases the risk of unintended vehicle movement, which may result in a crash and/or injury.

In February 2018, the company expanded the recall with NHTSA number 18V070000, adding certain 2017 Ram 1500 and 2500 trucks that were not included in the initial action.

Despite these recalls and dealer-performed repairs that involved replacing faulty BTSI components, NHTSAs ongoing reports indicate the defect might persist in some trucks.

NHTSA is opening this Recall Query investigation to understand the scope, frequency, and potential root causes of the additional rollaway incidents, the agency said in a notice posted this week.

Automaker Response

In a brief statement, Stellantis confirmed it is cooperating with NHTSA as the investigation proceeds but did not offer further details about any new corrective actions.

The outcome of the probe could determine whether Stellantis will be required to conduct yet another round of repairsor possibly expand the recall even further.

Ram trucks are among the most popular vehicles in the United States, meaning a widespread defect could have significant safety and financial implications for both the company and its customers. For now, drivers of affected models are urged to ensure their vehicles are on level ground and the parking brake is engaged whenever the truck is left unattended.

Class action seeks damages and destruction of the recordings

It's been nearly two decades since the 'shoe bomber' incident

By Truman Lewis of ConsumerAffairs

• Nearly two decades after the shoe bomber, passengers may soon keep footwear on at security checkpoints

• TSA quietly tests changes amid ongoing complaints about travel hassles

• Move could ease long lines and boost traveler satisfaction at U.S. airports

Travelers weary of peeling off their shoes at airport security may finally get some relief. The Transportation Security Administration is preparing to roll out new procedures that would allow passengers to keep their shoes on while passing through standard screening checkpoints, according to people familiar with the plans.

The shift, first reported by Gate Access, a travel newsletter, hasnt been formally announced, but signals a significant change for an agency that has kept the footwear rule in place for nearly 20 years. The TSA confirmed in a statement that it is always exploring new and innovative ways to enhance the passenger experience and our strong security posture, but added that any official updates would come through established channels.

A rule rooted in terror threats

The practice of removing shoes at airport security took hold after Richard Reid, infamously dubbed the shoe bomber, tried to ignite explosives hidden in his footwear during a 2001 flight from Paris to Miami. The attempt, though unsuccessful, sparked fears of similar plots in the tense aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks.

Initially, shoe-screening policies varied from airport to airport. It wasnt until 2006 that the TSA formally mandated shoe removal for all passengers, citing intelligence about a continuing threat. The rule became one of the most unpopular travel measures, blamed for slowing down lines and subjecting millions of passengers to the indignity of walking barefoot or in socks through security checkpoints.

Complaints and exemptions

Frustration over the shoe rule has fueled interest in TSA PreCheck, the trusted-traveler program that lets members keep their shoes on during screening. Children 12 and under and passengers 75 and older have also been exempt from the requirement.

In April, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy took to social media to crowdsource ideas on improving family travel. He later posted that its very clear that TSA is the #1 travel complaint.

If the planned change takes effect, it could dramatically improve the security experience for millions of travelersending one of the most visible legacies of post-9/11 aviation security.

No one seems to know, least of all the IRS

By Truman Lewis of ConsumerAffairs

• New law exempts up to $25,000 in tips from federal taxes, delivering on Trumps campaign pledge

• Unclear rules leave workers and employers guessing which tipsand jobsqualify

• IRS braces for administrative chaos amid staffing shortages and technological demands

A hallmark promise from Donald Trumps presidential campaign is now law, granting tipped workers a significant tax break. But even before the ink has dried, the new measure is sowing confusion across the service industry and posing major logistical challenges for the Internal Revenue Service.

Under the legislation, workers in jobs that customarily and regularly receive tips can exclude up to $25,000 in annual tip income from federal taxes.

The intent is to boost take-home pay for millions of restaurant servers, bartenders, hotel staff, and others who rely on customer gratuities. Yet critical details remain unresolved particularly around which tips count under the law and which workers are truly eligible.

Electronic tips in limbo

One of the thorniest questions is whether tips made via digital apps like Venmo, PayPal, and Cash App fall under the exemption. The statute refers specifically to cash tips, leaving ambiguity over electronic payments, which have become the norm in many businesses.

Historically, the IRS has treated electronic tips as taxable income, making the laws narrow language a potential flashpoint in future tax filings.

Businesses eye classification changes

Employers, meanwhile, are grappling with how the new tax rules might reshape hiring and compensation practices. Some labor experts warn that businesses could attempt to classify more positions as tipped to capitalize on the tax savings, potentially blurring legal lines under labor laws that strictly define which roles are tip-eligible.

Federal wage laws permit employers to pay tipped workers as little as $2.13 an hour if they receive at least $30 a month in tips and ultimately earn the full federal minimum wage once gratuities are counted.

Businesses can also establish tip pools, but those pools face limits on which workers can participate without requiring employers to pay higher base wages.

IRS faces hurdles

For the IRS, the new law comes at a time of significant internal strain. Agency officials are warning that implementing the tax break will demand major updates to systems and processes, even as the IRS contends with an aging workforce and a potential exodus of experienced employees. Roughly 22% of the IRSs customer service staff and 27% of its technology workforce are expected to leave by years end.

If theres any significant tax law changeand Im not talking just about extenders but certain types of income not being taxablethat is going to introduce a tremendous amount of challenge that people need to be thinking about in terms of systems that we need to update, said Doug ODonnell, former acting IRS Commissioner, in a Bloomberg News report.

Until clear IRS guidance arrives, the burden of properly tracking and reporting tips will fall on workers and businesses alike an arrangement that risks costly mistakes, audits, and lost tax savings.

While Trumps no-tax-on-tips pledge sailed through Congress on a wave of political enthusiasm, the real-world path to delivering relief to workers is proving far more complex and could leave many service industry employees in limbo as the next tax season approaches.